Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System (section Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System)https://www.nature.com/news/publishing-the-peer-review-scam-1.16400 EditorsPeer reviewers Peer review Fake peer-reviewing 2016 England Honesty Integrity Responsibility2 KB (205 words) - 15:05, 5 August 2021
- Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review (section Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review)that the peer-review process had been compromised. EditorsJournal publishersJournal editorsPeer reviewers 21/3/2016 Reliabiity Honesty Peer Review PE 10 -694 bytes (49 words) - 14:13, 21 June 2021
- world of publishing. Journal editors Education Open About Peer review Reliability Honesty Peer review ethics violation Favoritism Confidentiality PE 05.15 -667 bytes (46 words) - 12:45, 6 April 2021
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did (section Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did)the peer review process remains impartial and uncompromised. Peer reviewersJournal editorsResearchers Yongdeng Lei 20/03/2014 China Self peer review SH946 bytes (75 words) - 13:42, 21 June 2021
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis (section Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis)Amir Shmuel David Leopold 2008 Canada Germany USA Respect Reliability Peer Review Data Issues Data Ownership SH 04.05 - Social and clinical psychology633 bytes (44 words) - 13:39, 5 March 2021
- Open About Peer review Retractions: correcting the scientific literature Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science Peer review card game2 KB (239 words) - 21:24, 27 October 2020
- Serbian Journal Lands in Hot Water After Challenge on 24 hour Peer Review That Cost 1785 euros (section Serbian Journal Lands in Hot Water After Challenge on 24 hour Peer Review That Cost 1785 euros)Resources Cases This is a factual case. Researchers 7-7-2014 Serbia Honesty Peer review Corruption Nepotism Coercion Archives of Biological Sciences Publisher670 bytes (37 words) - 21:02, 26 May 2020
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review (section Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review)policy and set of guidelines on peer-reviewing. Some publishing bodies offer comprehensive sections on peer-reviewing ReserchersJournal editorsJournal1 KB (99 words) - 16:02, 21 June 2021
- open resource EditView sourceHistory Find out Resources Cases After a thorough investigation, the Publisher has concluded that the Editor was misled into832 bytes (82 words) - 16:22, 2 December 2021
- Peer review (section Peer review)sourceHistory Find out Resources Cases A professor tells a student that he is peer-reviewing the article of another research group, with whom you are in direct competition874 bytes (94 words) - 22:14, 27 April 2021
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold (section Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold)involved. Academic institutionsClinical researchersData protection officersPeer-reviewersJournal editors Nikos K. Logothetis Amir Shmuel David Leopold 20081 KB (142 words) - 16:26, 2 December 2021
- quality and transparency of the journal peer review system. For decades, several studies have suggested that the peer review system is slow, ineffective, inconsistent2 KB (259 words) - 15:36, 22 October 2021
- contribution was Oct 22, 2021 Education Open About Education Open About Peer review card game Curiosity Honesty Reliability Accountability Respect Research3 KB (383 words) - 14:23, 22 October 2021
- 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper (section 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper)manuscript under review ended up in the published review written by the peer reviewer and his colleague. The review was retracted, and the peer reviewer apologized1 KB (141 words) - 14:48, 19 August 2021
- by adding a statistical reviewer to the clinical peer review process. It showed evidence that peer review has a positive effect on the final quality of papers733 bytes (66 words) - 15:10, 27 October 2020
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project)procedure Conflict of Interest Editorial review Good Practice Peer Review Peer review ethics violation Peer reviewing Publication Ethics Reusing Published4 KB (422 words) - 15:23, 19 October 2021
- access publishing platform. It provides post-publication peer review. Researchers Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities327 bytes (30 words) - 13:41, 21 October 2020
- as the peer-review process is necessary. Sometimes, having an undisclosed interest could influence editorial decisions or hinder the proper review of manuscripts4 KB (479 words) - 17:32, 13 October 2020
- Open About Peer review COPE Present Accountability Objectivity Fairness Honesty Openness Availability Transparency Professionalism Peer Review Publication4 KB (438 words) - 13:06, 4 December 2020
- technology, and pedagogy. This journal has a three-stage peer review process. researchers Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities440 bytes (41 words) - 13:30, 21 October 2020