Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- 02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (section Good Practices & Misconduct)aware of the complexities of using moral theories for non-philosophers, his version of the model provides a framework for an orderly discussion of ethical7 KB (856 words) - 13:19, 8 August 2021
- Authorship criteria (section Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct)to the accuracy or completeness of any part of the work are properly investigated and resolved. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations:8 KB (1,039 words) - 18:49, 25 March 2021
- Researcher 2000 United States Accountability Plagiarism Allegation of Misconduct Plagiarism Allegation672 bytes (52 words) - 14:31, 5 March 2021
- requests of (any one from a) non-member organisation, but in general it will do so in cases of severe and founded allegations of research misconduct with a8 KB (1,119 words) - 15:14, 11 December 2019
- Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct (section Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct)2021 Education Open About Education Open About Research misconduct Honesty Allegations of misconduct Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism1 KB (126 words) - 15:07, 22 October 2021
- Dishonesty 2011 Denmark Honesty Respect Plagiarism Publication Ethics Allegation of Misconduct2 KB (165 words) - 15:03, 10 August 2020
- research conduct issue and may be considering whether to make an allegation of misconduct. It is important that staff and students have the opportunity to1 KB (209 words) - 15:24, 22 October 2021
- Polish National Science Centre Code on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Responsibility Transparency Adherence to Regulations Allegation of Misconduct Misconduct Investigations Research Misconduct Investigation2 KB (169 words) - 17:31, 20 October 2020
- The Flemish Council for Scientific Integrity's Guidelines on Plagiarism in Funding Applications (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Council for Research Integrity (VCW) 2017 Belgium Transparency Allegation of Misconduct Failure of Acknowledgment2 KB (163 words) - 12:03, 18 October 2021
- Honesty Respect Conflict of Interest Science Policy Allegation of Misconduct Duty to Disclose Commercial Interest Primary Interest of Academic Practice Secondary2 KB (256 words) - 16:16, 25 August 2020
- Capacity Misrepresentation Allegation of Misconduct Academic Responsibility of University Research in a Personal Capacity Scope of University's Complaints2 KB (237 words) - 13:08, 25 August 2020
- Serious Accusation of Negligence of Ethical Principles in Human Sciences (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)publication, the allegation was serious and the complainant had solid grounds for the validity of the allegation. Accordingly, TENK demanded that the institutions2 KB (228 words) - 15:53, 2 September 2020
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)Respect Disparaging and Derogatory Remarks Inappropriate Behaviour Allegation of Misconduct Academic Reputation Engineering and Technology LS 07.01 - Medical2 KB (224 words) - 18:07, 8 March 2021
- Honesty Respect Reliability Plagiarism Research Misconduct Institutional Responsibilities Allegation of Misconduct Whistleblowing Funders’ responsibilities Good3 KB (316 words) - 16:33, 21 October 2020
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Falsification Authorship Publication Ethics Image Manipulation Allegation of Misconduct Research Protocol Manipulation Reusing Published Material Reusing3 KB (339 words) - 19:07, 25 October 2020
- Honesty Respect Reliability Plagiarism Research Misconduct Institutional Responsibilities Allegation of Misconduct Whistleblowing Funders’ responsibilities Good2 KB (277 words) - 16:31, 21 October 2020
- methodology. According to research misconduct guidelines from the UK Research Integrity Office (UKRIO), when an allegation of misconduct is made to the organization5 KB (727 words) - 15:41, 10 June 2021
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (section Listen to and Recognise the Early Views and Associated Reasons of All Other Members of the Committee)Responsibility Accountability Transparency Academic Responsibility of University Allegations of misconduct Communication Complaints procedure Ethical Dilemma Good12 KB (1,620 words) - 13:20, 8 August 2021
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)Accountability Honesty Reliability Respect Research Misconduct Institutional Responsibilities Allegation of Misconduct Whistleblowing Funders’ responsibilities Good4 KB (441 words) - 16:34, 21 October 2020
- Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges (section Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges)requires that “upon receiving an allegation of research misconduct,” the university must “immediately assess the allegation.” Thus UND appointed a faculty2 KB (184 words) - 16:11, 26 October 2020
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Whistleblowing and the monitoring of research misconduct; Barriers to reporting cases of research misconduct; Power imbalances between students/early-career4 KB (432 words) - 15:23, 19 October 2021
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Research with humans The impact of the GDPR on scientific data Fairness Honesty Respect Responsibility Allegation of Misconduct Balancing harms and benefits4 KB (436 words) - 15:24, 19 October 2021
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Non-reporting of negative findings Outcome reporting bias P-value hacking Fairness Honesty Respect Responsibility Allegation of Misconduct Bias Experimental4 KB (407 words) - 15:20, 19 October 2021
- Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)guidelines to handle cases of alleged research misconduct. The objective of the guidelines was to recognise research misconduct and to establish common norms1 KB (151 words) - 14:39, 20 October 2020
- Legal rights of accused scientists (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)policies and procedures for research misconduct Research misconduct Transparency Allegations of misconduct Research Misconduct Investigation2 KB (174 words) - 15:07, 22 October 2021
- Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct (section Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct)Resources Guidelines In order to maintain high standards of research integrity, allegations of misconduct are taken seriously at the Dublin City University (DCU)759 bytes (58 words) - 11:27, 28 September 2022
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)guidelines Fairness Honesty Responsibility Respect Allegation of Misconduct Citing Complaints procedure Conflict of Interest Editorial review Good Practice Peer4 KB (422 words) - 15:23, 19 October 2021
- Fabrication (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)Fabrication is one of the most severe violations of research integrity. It is considered serious research misconduct. In the European Code of Conduct fabrication3 KB (370 words) - 12:08, 16 October 2020
- About Scenarios Open About Fairness Honesty Respect Responsibility Allegation of Misconduct Anonymization Authorship Bias Beneficence Citing Collaborative6 KB (646 words) - 15:24, 22 October 2021
- difficult decisions about allegations of misconduct, authorship disputes, conflicts of interest, lack of ethical oversight of a submission, and so on. The3 KB (278 words) - 16:46, 25 March 2021
- ‘right’ answer All stakeholders in research Research misconduct UKRIO United Kingdom Allegations of misconduct1 KB (164 words) - 12:36, 30 September 2020
- The Lab: Avoiding Research Misconduct (section European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct)States Honesty Respect Allegations of misconduct Research misconduct Whistleblowing Mentor/trainee relationship Allegations of misconduct Data management Authorship2 KB (235 words) - 11:47, 23 October 2020
- violations of good research practice or allegations of misconduct are handled in different countries. However, it always is in the interest of society and5 KB (539 words) - 15:11, 22 October 2021
- Belgium Reliability Honesty Authorship Conflict of interest Plagiarism Data management Allegations of misconduct811 bytes (82 words) - 10:24, 22 September 2020
- second volume on responsible research, the result of the panel of experts of the National Academy of Sciences. It includes papers and institutional reports921 bytes (85 words) - 13:41, 29 September 2020
- COPE flowcharts (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Publication ethics Peer review Conflict of interest Intellectual property Data management Allegations of misconduct https://publicationethics.org/guidance/Flowcharts691 bytes (67 words) - 09:34, 27 May 2020
- the first volume of textbook on resposnible research and the result of a two-year study by a panel of experts of the National Academy of Sciences. It investigates945 bytes (91 words) - 13:39, 29 September 2020
- Research misconduct Authorship Conflict of interest Data management Reproducability Peer review Intellectual property Allegations of misconduct1,020 bytes (112 words) - 17:23, 19 August 2021
- guidelines. Research misconduct: Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Guidelines of the Finnish Advisory24 KB (2,121 words) - 11:14, 10 April 2024
- management Social responsibilities Safety Work environment Allegations of misconduct Conflict of interest Authorship916 bytes (78 words) - 13:04, 29 September 2020
- research misconduct. They work for the good of their institution and the whole scientific community. The consequences of scientific misconduct are far-reaching4 KB (606 words) - 15:11, 22 October 2021
- ORI Infographics (section Research misconduct)Fabrication Falsification Research misconduct Whistleblowing Questionable research practice Allegations of misconduct Plagiarism Authorship Mentor/trainee1 KB (124 words) - 11:48, 28 October 2020
- UKRIO's Procedure for the investigation of misconduct in research (section UKRIO's Procedure for the investigation of misconduct in research)UK. As part of their responsibilities, they provide guidelines on handling research misconducts, including principles and practical aspects of the investigation1 KB (123 words) - 14:55, 28 February 2022
- Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale (section Good Practices & Misconduct)2-11-2014 2014 USA United States Respect Allegations of misconduct Sexual harassment Factual case Lewin, T. "Handling of sexual harassment case poses larger1 KB (149 words) - 11:02, 17 September 2020
- Major indexing service rejects appeals by two suppressed journals (section Good Practices & Misconduct)an interesting case for several reasons. Firstly, it shows that allegations of misconduct are not restricted to individual researchers and their institutions2 KB (183 words) - 12:30, 6 July 2021
- European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct (section European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct)Violations and Allegations of Misconduct”. The Handbook consists of detailed practical recommendations on how to deal with research misconduct and other unacceptable2 KB (196 words) - 14:35, 20 October 2020
- The Manchester University's Code of Practice for Investigating Concerns about the Conduct of Research (section The Manchester University's Code of Practice for Investigating Concerns about the Conduct of Research)at large. Therefore, allegations of misconduct are to be taken seriously, while simultaneously preserving the confidentiality of the complainants and respondents1 KB (110 words) - 13:41, 28 February 2022
- and practices. The Guidelines for the Investigation of Misconduct in Research do not oblige adoption of a single standardised procedure but provide principles22 KB (1,855 words) - 19:08, 24 October 2021
- example of the many formats that plagiarism can take (see also Loui, 2002). It is also a reminder of how easily and, often unintentional, breech of ethical2 KB (180 words) - 17:15, 26 February 2021
- with cases of research misconduct. The procedures are described by the internal Code of Conduct of each institution . The publication of cases of misconduct20 KB (1,674 words) - 10:50, 25 October 2021