Module C.1 - Introduction to ALTAI Requirements

From The Embassy of Good Science

Module C.1 - Introduction to ALTAI Requirements

Instructions for:ParticipantTrainer
Related Initiative
Goal

Module C introduces the AI Ethics Issues Identification process as the practical evaluation framework of the AIOLIA training programme. It translates the seven ALTAI requirements into an actionable, checklist-based methodology that enables learners to systematically detect, evaluate, and document ethical risks across real-world AI applications.

Building upon the core operational workflow established in Module B, this module anchors abstract ethics principles to concrete evaluation steps. Through guided theory, illustrative vignettes, and applied use case scenarios, it trains learners to move beyond passive awareness and rigorously analyze how complex issues—such as automation bias, proxy discrimination, data privacy erosion, black-box opacity, and loss of human agency—manifest across diverse operational contexts.

Learning Goals

  • Master the 7 Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (ALTAI) requirements and their core ethical dimensions.
  • Apply Section 0 of the AIOLIA Issues Identification Checklist to define system scope, inputs/outputs, and affected stakeholder groups.
  • Systematically evaluate AI systems across Sections 1–7 of the checklist using structured Likert-scale assessments and narrative scenario criteria.
  • Distinguish between technical, organizational, and societal root causes of ethical risks within real-world deployments.
  • Formulate clear, auditable issue statements to document identified risks, creating a reliable foundation for downstream mitigation strategies.
Duration (hours)
1

What is this about?

Module C focuses on the practical identification and evaluation of AI ethics issues within real-world applications. Operationalising the seven Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (ALTAI) requirements through the AIOLIA Issues Identification Checklist, this module guides learners from foundational ethics principles to hands-on risk assessment. Learners explore how ethical challenges, such as automation bias, black-box opacity, proxy discrimination, and privacy erosion, manifest across diverse contexts, equipping them with the methodology needed to systematically detect, analyze, and document ethical risks.

Why is this important?

High-level ethical principles and regulatory frameworks like the EU AI Act are effective only if practitioners can translate them into concrete evaluations during system design and deployment. Identifying ethical issues early prevents costly re-engineering, regulatory non-compliance, and real-world harms such as algorithmic discrimination, privacy breaches, and safety failures. By mastering systematic issue identification using structured checklists, learners gain the critical capacity to transform abstract governance standards into actionable, auditable risk assessments.
1
Introduction to ALTAI Requirements

The seven Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (ALTAI) requirements, established by the European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on AI, define the core technical, organizational, and ethical standards for human-centric AI systems. The framework establishes that trustworthy AI must be lawful, ethical, and robust across its operational lifecycle. The foundational requirements begin with Human Agency and Oversight, which mandates that systems support human autonomy rather than replacing critical decision-making, guarding against challenges like automation bias. Technical Robustness and Safety requires systems to maintain accuracy, resilience against adversarial attacks, and reliable fallback mechanisms. Privacy and Data Governance enforces data protection standards, ensuring full control over personal data, lawful processing, and proper consent mechanisms.

Building upon governance and system integrity, Transparency requires clear explainability of model outputs, traceability of algorithmic decisions, and honest communication about system capabilities and limitations. Diversity, Non-Discrimination, and Fairness targets algorithmic bias and proxy discrimination, requiring representative training datasets and equitable outcomes across protected demographic groups.

At a broader level, Societal and Environmental Well-Being evaluates the systemic impacts of AI deployment, including psychological impacts, democratic discourse, and the ecological footprint of model training and inference. Finally, Accountability establishes mechanisms for auditability, risk assessment, and clear human oversight to ensure legal and moral responsibility when harms or errors occur.

AIOLIA Module C.1 (Introduction to ALTAI Requirements)

Steps

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.9.1