Difference between revisions of "Resource:Aef6b98d-9cc5-4db0-bffd-4a3daa99a3f3"
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Education |Title=Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project |Is About=Members of The Embassy of...") |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
It focuses on issues regarding: | It focuses on issues regarding: | ||
| − | * Dual submissions | + | *Dual submissions |
| − | * Authorship lists | + | *Authorship lists |
| − | * Plagiarism | + | *Plagiarism |
| − | * Complaints procedures | + | *Complaints procedures |
| − | * Editorial decisions | + | *Editorial decisions |
| − | * Retraction | + | *Retraction |
It is interspersed with questions and resource suggestions that help guide researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators in their deliberations concerning the research integrity issues raised by the narrative. | It is interspersed with questions and resource suggestions that help guide researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators in their deliberations concerning the research integrity issues raised by the narrative. | ||
| − | |Important Because=The scenarios are designed to help researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators to become better acquainted with ''[https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of-conduct_en.pdf The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity]'' ('ECCRI') as a regulatory document that articulates the standards of good research practice. | + | |Important Because=The scenarios are designed to help researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators to become better acquainted with ''[https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of-conduct_en.pdf The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity]'' ('ECCRI' or 'ECoC') as a regulatory document that articulates the standards of good research practice. |
They also allow users to reflect on and apply their own national and institutional research ethics and research integrity codes as well as other key regulatory documents and guidelines. | They also allow users to reflect on and apply their own national and institutional research ethics and research integrity codes as well as other key regulatory documents and guidelines. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The goal is for the user to gain knowledge of the standards associated with good research practices and to make sense of these standards in different research contexts. | The goal is for the user to gain knowledge of the standards associated with good research practices and to make sense of these standards in different research contexts. | ||
| − | According to the ECCRI, there are eight categories of research contexts that are covered by the standards of good research practice: | + | According to the ECCRI/ECoC, there are eight categories of research contexts that are covered by the standards of good research practice: |
Revision as of 13:04, 1 August 2020
ResourcesPublication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
What is this about?
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of eight scenarios for educational purposes and to stimulate strategic thinking about issues in research ethics and research integrity.
This scenario presents a hypothetical narrative on the theme of Publication and Dissemination.
It focuses on issues regarding:
- Dual submissions
- Authorship lists
- Plagiarism
- Complaints procedures
- Editorial decisions
- Retraction
Why is this important?
The scenarios are designed to help researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators to become better acquainted with The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity ('ECCRI' or 'ECoC') as a regulatory document that articulates the standards of good research practice.
They also allow users to reflect on and apply their own national and institutional research ethics and research integrity codes as well as other key regulatory documents and guidelines.
The goal is for the user to gain knowledge of the standards associated with good research practices and to make sense of these standards in different research contexts.
According to the ECCRI/ECoC, there are eight categories of research contexts that are covered by the standards of good research practice:
1) Research Environment
2) Training, Supervision and Mentoring
3) Research Procedures
4) Safeguards
5) Data Practices and Management
6) Collaborative Working
8) Reviewing, Evaluating and Editing
