Difference between revisions of "Resource:369d2eb6-90ef-4198-8268-a95e51a307d0"

From The Embassy of Good Science
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Title=The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences
 
|Title=The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences
 
|Is About=This paper focuses on the infamous case of Hwang Woo Suk, the South-Korean national hero and once celebrated pioneer of stem cell research. After briefly discussing the evolution of his publication and research scandal in Science, the author attempts to outline the main reactions that emerged within scientific and bioethical discourses on the problem of research misconduct in contemporary biosciences. This is a factual case.
 
|Is About=This paper focuses on the infamous case of Hwang Woo Suk, the South-Korean national hero and once celebrated pioneer of stem cell research. After briefly discussing the evolution of his publication and research scandal in Science, the author attempts to outline the main reactions that emerged within scientific and bioethical discourses on the problem of research misconduct in contemporary biosciences. This is a factual case.
 
+
|Important Because=Regulatory oversight, ethical requirements and institutional safeguards are often viewed by the scientific community as merely decelerating scientific progress and causing delays in the application of treatments. The Hwang’s case represents how unimpeded progress works in contemporary science. Thus, the case might shed light on the often neglected benefits of “the social control of science”.
Kakuk, P. The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences.                    ''Sci Eng Ethics'' 15''', '''545 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9121-x
 
|Important Because=This case presents a group of problems that might endanger scientific integrity and public trust. Regulatory oversight, ethical requirements and institutional safeguards are often viewed by the scientific community as merely decelerating scientific progress and causing delays in the application of treatments. The Hwang’s case represents how unimpeded progress works in contemporary science. Thus, the case might shed light on the often neglected benefits of “the social control of science”.
 
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 12: Line 10:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Related To
 
{{Related To
|Related To Resource=Resource:8354ff67-9da4-4325-8395-d16e30059fb2;Resource:D303f2ff-021f-4b2e-a145-f7b441e35830;Resource:740210e9-b695-428b-90a3-f3af7a94a174;Resource:Dd7bd3da-ee07-4642-8b4e-23e18d16fa4b
+
|Related To Resource=Resource:8354ff67-9da4-4325-8395-d16e30059fb2;Resource:740210e9-b695-428b-90a3-f3af7a94a174;Resource:Dd7bd3da-ee07-4642-8b4e-23e18d16fa4b
 
|Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c;Theme:13ae94da-15d6-426f-8f6e-9134fb57e267
 
|Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c;Theme:13ae94da-15d6-426f-8f6e-9134fb57e267
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
|Involves=Hwang Woo Suk; Péter Kakuk
 
 
|Has Timepoint=2004; 2005; 2009
 
|Has Timepoint=2004; 2005; 2009
 
|Has Location=Korea
 
|Has Location=Korea

Latest revision as of 18:17, 25 October 2020

Cases

The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences

What is this about?

This paper focuses on the infamous case of Hwang Woo Suk, the South-Korean national hero and once celebrated pioneer of stem cell research. After briefly discussing the evolution of his publication and research scandal in Science, the author attempts to outline the main reactions that emerged within scientific and bioethical discourses on the problem of research misconduct in contemporary biosciences. This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

Regulatory oversight, ethical requirements and institutional safeguards are often viewed by the scientific community as merely decelerating scientific progress and causing delays in the application of treatments. The Hwang’s case represents how unimpeded progress works in contemporary science. Thus, the case might shed light on the often neglected benefits of “the social control of science”.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6