Why is this important? (Important Because)
From The Embassy of Good Science
A description to provide more focus to the theme/resource (max. 200 words)
- ⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Text
C
Charter of ethics and guiding principles of scientific research in Lebanon (2016), Mouin Hamzé, Nayef Saade, Fawaz Fawaz +
Charter of ethics and guiding principles of scientific research in Lebanon distils national expectations for research integrity in Lebanon and clarifies what researchers and institutions in Lebanon need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark;for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by Mouin Hamzé, Nayef Saade, Fawaz Fawaz in 2016, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
These documents provide a basis for engagement with ecofeminist issues as they arise in project implementation and in thinking about the green transition more broadly. +
The case demonstrates supervisory responsibilities in relation to the health and safety of young researchers who are working in a laboratory. +
Code of Conduct for Responsible Research' is important because it ensures credibility and trust in research by providing both preventive and corrective guidance. It prevents misconduct by educating researchers on standards, and offers frameworks for addressing violations fairly. In today’s interconnected research environment, having shared ethical codes strengthens international collaboration and consistency. For governments, institutions, and the public, this document demonstrates commitment to transparency, fairness, and societal responsibility. It is not just a guideline but a foundation for safeguarding the reliability of research outcomes. +
In an interview, the director of the National Natural Science Foundation of China states that the standards set in the document are relevant for the creation of a culture of fairness and honesty. He claims that this is crucial to preserve the public trust in research findings and set guidelines to create concrete policy for managing an increasing quantity of funds. +
The library provides accessible, credible information to support informed decision-making for professionals and patients. In the Internet age, people have much greater access to health information, but little way of knowing whether that information is accurate and unbiased. The initiative provides a tool to make evidence based decisions in order to improve health and healthcare from multiple perspectives. +
Code of Conduct for Research Integrity distils national expectations for research integrity in Ireland and clarifies what researchers and institutions in Ireland (but also researchers funded by Royal Irish Academy) need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark;for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by The Royal Irish Academy in 2020, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
This code is important because XR technologies can strongly affect people’s behavior, privacy, safety, and social inclusion. A shared code of conduct helps developers make better decisions throughout the technology lifecycle and encourages responsible innovation. It also supports trust among users, policymakers, researchers, and industry by promoting ethical standards, accountability, and protection of human rights. In this way, it helps ensure that XR technologies are developed not only to be innovative, but also fair, safe, and beneficial for society. +
Code of Ethics Young Scientists distils international expectations for research integrity in International and clarifies what researchers and institutions in International need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark;for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by nan in 2018, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
Code of Ethics for Researchers of the Czech Academy of Sciences' is important because it ensures credibility and trust in research by providing both preventive and corrective guidance. It prevents misconduct by educating researchers on standards, and offers frameworks for addressing violations fairly. In today’s interconnected research environment, having shared ethical codes strengthens international collaboration and consistency. For governments, institutions, and the public, this document demonstrates commitment to transparency, fairness, and societal responsibility. It is not just a guideline but a foundation for safeguarding the reliability of research outcomes. +
Code of Ethics for Scientific Research in Belgium (2009), Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux Arts de Belgique, the Académie Royale de Médecine de Belgique, the Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten and the Koninklijke Academie voor Geneeskunde van België +
Code of Ethics for Scientific Research in Belgium distils national expectations for research integrity in Belgium and clarifies what researchers and institutions in Belgium-funded research need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark;for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux Arts de Belgique, the Académie Royale de Médecine de Belgique, the Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten and the Koninklijke Academie voor Geneeskunde van België in 2009, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
Code of Ethics for Scientific Research in Belgium' is important because it ensures credibility and trust in research by providing both preventive and corrective guidance. It prevents misconduct by educating researchers on standards, and offers frameworks for addressing violations fairly. In today’s interconnected research environment, having shared ethical codes strengthens international collaboration and consistency. For governments, institutions, and the public, this document demonstrates commitment to transparency, fairness, and societal responsibility. It is not just a guideline but a foundation for safeguarding the reliability of research outcomes. +
Code of Ethics of Estonian Scientists distils national expectations for research integrity in Estonia and clarifies what researchers and institutions in nan need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark;for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by ? it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
Code of Ethics of Estonian Scientists' is important because it ensures credibility and trust in research by providing both preventive and corrective guidance. It prevents misconduct by educating researchers on standards, and offers frameworks for addressing violations fairly. In today’s interconnected research environment, having shared ethical codes strengthens international collaboration and consistency. For governments, institutions, and the public, this document demonstrates commitment to transparency, fairness, and societal responsibility. It is not just a guideline but a foundation for safeguarding the reliability of research outcomes. +
Code of Good Scientific Practice distils regional (state of sao paulo) expectations for research integrity in Brazil and clarifies what researchers and institutions in Brazil need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark;for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by FAPESP São Paulo Research Foundation in 2014, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
Code of Good Scientific Practice CSIC distils national expectations for research integrity in Spain and clarifies what researchers and institutions in Spain need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark;for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by nan in 2021, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
This document lays down prerequisites that need to be upheld by all researchers and research institutions that are supported by the CSIC. It is divided into 4 domains: principles of research, the researcher as a science professional, publications and communication and institutional framework. The legal bases for these good conduct practices are included in the Annex. +
Code of Professional Standards and Ethics in Science, Technology, and the Humanities distils national expectations for research integrity in New Zealand and clarifies what researchers and institutions in Aotearoa - New Zealand need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark;for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by nan in 2019, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
The Code is important because organoid research is advancing rapidly, but laws, regulations, and ethical frameworks have lagged behind. Without clear guidelines, researchers might inadvertently cross moral, legal, or societal boundaries, raising public concern and potentially undermining trust. The Code helps ensure that organoid development proceeds with accountability, transparency, and respect for human dignity. It supports ethics committees, institutions, and researchers in making better decisions about consent, usage, safety, and public engagement. Moreover, by defining responsible conduct, it contributes to harmonising practices across countries and institutions, which is vital in collaborative scientific research. Ultimately, it helps protect participants, donors, researchers, and society, while enabling innovation in a safer and more ethically informed manner. +
Codul General de Etică în Cercetarea Științifică - General code of ethics in scientific research (2015) +
Codul General de Etică în Cercetarea Științifică - General code of ethics in scientific research distils national expectations for research integrity in Romania and clarifies what researchers and institutions in nan need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark;for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by nan in 2015, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation. +
