Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section
- FRQ Open Access Dissemination Policy (2022), Fonds de recherche du Québec (FRQ)
- Slow Code
- Taiwan Junior Code of Conduct for Research Integrity 2023
- Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet
- Enhancing EU law on climate engineering, neurotechnologies, and digital extended reality (policy brief)
- Responsible science: vol. 2
- Community consultation and public disclosure: preliminary results from a new model
- Code of Ethics of the Croatian Science Foundation (April 2018)
- Credit for work
- Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS)
- Reproducibility training
- OeAWI Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice (2018)
- Protecting Research Subjects
- The PREPARED Code: Global Code of Conduct for Research during Pandemics
- Integrating Ethics Into a Research Experience for Undergraduates
- Open science outlook 1: status and trends around the world
- Open Access Policy at Czech Academy of Sciences
- National Principles for Open Access Policy Statement (2013), National Steering Committee on Open Access Policy
- UKRIO's Guidance for researchers on retractions in academic journals
- Path2Integrity Online Learning Environment
- National Policy on Academic Ethics (2019), Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage
- Fraud in Fluid Resuscitation Research
- The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers
- Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media
- Open Access - information for researchers (2024) — Swiss National Science Foundation
- Eigenfactorizer
- Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People
- Conflicts with Community Leaders
- Ousted: Rule-Breaking Lundbeck CEO and Novartis Scientist Get the Boot
- Declaration of Geneva
- Irish Council for Bioethics' Recommendations for Promoting Research Integrity
- UNESCO Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers 2018
- PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven)
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel
- Designing Online Resources in Preparation for Authentic Laboratory Experiences
- A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials
- Research ethics committee conditions: Ethical challenges of researching with poor communities in Malawi
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide
- Bias in hiring
- New Zealand Code of Professional Standards and Ethics in Science, Technology, and the Humanities (2019)
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture
- Code of Ethics for Scientific Research in Belgium (Belgium, 2009)
- Responsible conduct in research
