Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Open Access Policy at Czech Academy of Sciences
- National Principles for Open Access Policy Statement (2013), National Steering Committee on Open Access Policy
- UKRIO's Guidance for researchers on retractions in academic journals
- Path2Integrity Online Learning Environment
- National Policy on Academic Ethics (2019), Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage
- Fraud in Fluid Resuscitation Research
- The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers
- Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media
- Open Access - information for researchers (2024) — Swiss National Science Foundation
- Eigenfactorizer
- Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People
- Conflicts with Community Leaders
- Ousted: Rule-Breaking Lundbeck CEO and Novartis Scientist Get the Boot
- Declaration of Geneva
- Irish Council for Bioethics' Recommendations for Promoting Research Integrity
- UNESCO Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers 2018
- PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven)
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel
- Designing Online Resources in Preparation for Authentic Laboratory Experiences
- A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials
- Research ethics committee conditions: Ethical challenges of researching with poor communities in Malawi
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide
- Bias in hiring
- New Zealand Code of Professional Standards and Ethics in Science, Technology, and the Humanities (2019)
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture
- Code of Ethics for Scientific Research in Belgium (Belgium, 2009)
- Responsible conduct in research
- Data Handling and Record Keeping
- Mobile Application
- The Paroxetine 352 Bipolar Trial: A Study in Medical Ghostwriting
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice for Fieldwork Training
- The value of respect in human research ethics: a conceptual analysis and a practical guide
- Collaboration dispute
- Irish Universities Quality Board's Good Practice for Institutional Research in Irish Higher Education
- Training overview
- THE MALAYSIAN CODE OF RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN RESEARCH 2020
- CROATIAN OPEN ACCESS DECLARATION (2012), Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts
- PRBB Code of Good Scientific Practice
- Hidden for a century, 'fake' is actually a Van Gogh
- Writing usable qualitative health research findings
- Paxil Study Under Fire
- Psychologist made up sex bias results
- Overview: underserved areas of education in the responsible conduct of research: authorship
- Brussels Declaration on Open Access (2012), Federal Science Policy, Wallonia-Brussels Federation, and Flemish Ministry for Economy, Science, and Innovation
- Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: Issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC
- Guidelines for Responsible Data Management in Scientific Research
