Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Using cases with contrary facts to illustrate and facilitate ethical analysis
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations
- Fresh Misconduct Charges Hit Dutch Social Psychology
- Informal Surveys for Policy and Planning that "Trigger" Research Projects
- The Case of the Egyptian Travel Agent
- The University of Oslo's 10 commandements for ethical practice in research
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice
- Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology (NESH, Norway)
- Nanyang Technological University's Research Data Policy (Singapore)
- Case study: AI systems as personal companions assisting senior citizens
- Age-Old Conflicts
- European Nuclear Society (ENS) Ethical Charter
- Mistaken Claim of Authorship
- HEA Principles of Good Practice in Research within Irish Higher Education Institutions 2020
- Negotiating confidentiality, privacy and consent in focus groups with children and young people.
- Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), Open Society Institute (now Open Society Foundations -OSF)
- Social Sciences and Humanities Matter. Guidelines on How To Successfully Design and Implement, Mission-Oriented Research Programmes
- Backstage Maneuvers
- Collaborative science
- Institution alleges that paper includes fabricated data
- Excellent science communication for society at large through informal activities- policy brief
- Developing an ethical and reflexive mindset in emerging childhood researchers.
- THE CONCORDAT TO SUPPORT RESEARCH INTEGRITY (UK, 2025)
- Nine pitfalls of research misconduct
- Academic integrity checklist
- Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector
- Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences' Guideline on Authorship in Scientific Publications
- The Danish Act on the Innovation Fund
- The Ethics Codes Collection
- Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism
- Authors couldn’t find a patient to give consent for case report. Then the patient found the report.
- Using student generated codes of conduct in the classroom to reinforce business ethics education
- Think. Check. Submit.
- Image manipulation research
- Conflict of interest disclosure in early education of medical students
- Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals
- Finnish TENK Guide to Agreeing on Authorship: Recommendation for Research Publications
- COPE flowcharts
- Guidelines to the Rules on Open Access to Scientific Publications & Open Access to Research Data in Horizon 2020 (2017), European Comission
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland
- Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent
- Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance
- Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation
- The Danish Act on the Research Advisory System
- Becoming an Ethical Researcher
- Swedish plastics study fabricated, panel finds
- Outcomes assessment of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research
