Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- ENERI Classroom
- Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study
- Publishing complications and patient safety
- Successful and timely uptake of artificial intelligence in science in the EU
- European Commission Guidance on Research on Refugees, Asylum Seekers & Migrants
- Research or Services?
- U.S. Gov’t Physicist Sentenced to 18 months in Prison for Fraud
- cOAlition S Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications
- Manchester University's Data Management Planning Guidance
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Oversight and Protection Actors
- Portuguese National Council of Ethics for the Life Sciences Recommendation on Integrity in Scientific Research
- Romanian Codul General de Etică în Cercetarea Științifică - General code of ethics in scientific research 2015
- Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing
- Resolution on the Research and Innovation Strategy of Slovenia
- European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Code of Ethics
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues
- Tongan children’s involvement in research
- Data Sharing and Potential Future Uses
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Guidelines for the Investigation of Misconduct in Research
- Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering
- ENERI Decision Tree
- Confronting Research Misconduct in Citizen Science
- Recommendations on the Preparation, Adaptation and Implementation of Academic Ethics Codes by Research and Higher Education Institutions
- Embedding a comprehensive ethical dimension to organoid-based research and resulting technologies (Policy brief 2)
- A Guidebook for Teaching Selected RCR Topics to Culturally Diverse Trainee Groups
- The European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ECHRBmed)
- Reporting violations
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Switzerland
- Research fraud on MMR vaccines
- Mad Scientist: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Climate science controversies and the demand for access to empirical data
- Plagiarism in a PhD Thesis
- The qualification portfolio (UMC Utrecht): from output to impact
- How can we provide effective training for research ethics committee members? A European assessment
- Accuracy of Credentials and Competence in Public Communications
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal
- Te Ara Tika Guidelines for Māori research ethics: A framework for researchers and ethics committee members New Zealand, 2010
- Where are they now?
- The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Ethical Reflection on Plagiarism in Scientific Research
- Ethics, Human Rights and HIV Vaccine Trials in Low-Income Settings
- Quality History Education in the 21st Century Principles and Guidelines
- Lectures. Research Ethics Training Virtual Course
- Peer review
- Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research (2021), Canadian Institutes of Health Research Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- UK Research and Innovation policy and guidelines on governance of good research conduct (2024), UK Research and Innovation
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes
- COPE seminar, webinar and ppt presentation
- Ley de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación (2011), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Gobierno de España
- Transparency instruments to quantify the method transparency, analytic robustness, and replicability of empirical research
