Oldest pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Climategate' scientist speaks out (09:32, 2 March 2026)
- Guidelines for scientists on communicating with the media (09:32, 2 March 2026)
- Researchers Call For the Release of Findings of a Misconduct Investigation (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Faculty development: if you build it, they will come (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Retracted gay-marriage study debated at misconduct meet-up (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Guidelines 03/2020 on the processing of data concerning health for the purpose of scientific research in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- The Tadpole Paper Mill (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Central statistical monitoring: detecting fraud in clinical trials (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Ethics in educational research: Introducing a methodological tool for effective ethical analysis (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Peer-mentored research development meeting: a model for successful peer mentoring among junior level researchers (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Teaching the Ethical Principles of Psychology (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- ALLEA Permanent Working Group Science and Ethics (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Intellectual Rights Involving Multiple Institutions (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Development of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Plagiarism (09:44, 2 March 2026)
- Preprint servers (09:44, 2 March 2026)
- Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities (09:44, 2 March 2026)
- Open access publishing: the new norm? (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Eigenfactor (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Editorial conflicts of interest (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Supervision Guidelines (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Moral conflict and moral dilemma (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Informed consent in psychiatry (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Inaccurate representation of results in the media (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Serious gaming in research integrity education (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Dilemmas in daily practice (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Cross-boundary collaborations (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Statistical pre-registration (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Research integrity training for PhD students (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Incidental research findings (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Peer review card game (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Ignoring substantial safety risks of studies (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Conducting research in high risk locations (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Posing irrelevant research questions (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Dialogue versus debate (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Monitoring funding processes (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Collaborative working (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- H-index (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Research integrity training for diverse disciplines (09:46, 2 March 2026)
