Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System (section Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System)https://www.nature.com/news/publishing-the-peer-review-scam-1.16400 EditorsPeer reviewers Peer review Fake peer-reviewing 2016 England Honesty Integrity Responsibility2 KB (205 words) - 15:05, 5 August 2021
- Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review (section Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review)that the peer-review process had been compromised. EditorsJournal publishersJournal editorsPeer reviewers 21/3/2016 Reliabiity Honesty Peer Review PE 10 -694 bytes (49 words) - 14:13, 21 June 2021
- world of publishing. Journal editors Education Open About Peer review Reliability Honesty Peer review ethics violation Favoritism Confidentiality PE 05.15 -667 bytes (46 words) - 12:45, 6 April 2021
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did (section Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did)the peer review process remains impartial and uncompromised. Peer reviewersJournal editorsResearchers Yongdeng Lei 20/03/2014 China Self peer review SH946 bytes (75 words) - 13:42, 21 June 2021
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis (section Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis)Amir Shmuel David Leopold 2008 Canada Germany USA Respect Reliability Peer Review Data Issues Data Ownership SH 04.05 - Social and clinical psychology633 bytes (44 words) - 13:39, 5 March 2021
- Open About Peer review Retractions: correcting the scientific literature Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science Peer review card game2 KB (239 words) - 21:24, 27 October 2020
- Serbian Journal Lands in Hot Water After Challenge on 24 hour Peer Review That Cost 1785 euros (section Serbian Journal Lands in Hot Water After Challenge on 24 hour Peer Review That Cost 1785 euros)Resources Cases This is a factual case. Researchers 7-7-2014 Serbia Honesty Peer review Corruption Nepotism Coercion Archives of Biological Sciences Publisher670 bytes (37 words) - 21:02, 26 May 2020
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review (section Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review)policy and set of guidelines on peer-reviewing. Some publishing bodies offer comprehensive sections on peer-reviewing ReserchersJournal editorsJournal1 KB (99 words) - 16:02, 21 June 2021
- open resource EditView sourceHistory Find out Resources Cases After a thorough investigation, the Publisher has concluded that the Editor was misled into832 bytes (82 words) - 16:22, 2 December 2021
- Peer review (section Peer review)sourceHistory Find out Resources Cases A professor tells a student that he is peer-reviewing the article of another research group, with whom you are in direct competition874 bytes (94 words) - 22:14, 27 April 2021
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold (section Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold)involved. Academic institutionsClinical researchersData protection officersPeer-reviewersJournal editors Nikos K. Logothetis Amir Shmuel David Leopold 20081 KB (142 words) - 16:26, 2 December 2021
- quality and transparency of the journal peer review system. For decades, several studies have suggested that the peer review system is slow, ineffective, inconsistent2 KB (259 words) - 15:36, 22 October 2021
- contribution was Oct 22, 2021 Education Open About Education Open About Peer review card game Curiosity Honesty Reliability Accountability Respect Research3 KB (383 words) - 14:23, 22 October 2021
- 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper (section 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper)manuscript under review ended up in the published review written by the peer reviewer and his colleague. The review was retracted, and the peer reviewer apologized1 KB (141 words) - 14:48, 19 August 2021
- by adding a statistical reviewer to the clinical peer review process. It showed evidence that peer review has a positive effect on the final quality of papers733 bytes (66 words) - 15:10, 27 October 2020
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project)procedure Conflict of Interest Editorial review Good Practice Peer Review Peer review ethics violation Peer reviewing Publication Ethics Reusing Published4 KB (422 words) - 15:23, 19 October 2021
- access publishing platform. It provides post-publication peer review. Researchers Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities327 bytes (30 words) - 13:41, 21 October 2020
- as the peer-review process is necessary. Sometimes, having an undisclosed interest could influence editorial decisions or hinder the proper review of manuscripts4 KB (479 words) - 17:32, 13 October 2020
- Open About Peer review COPE Present Accountability Objectivity Fairness Honesty Openness Availability Transparency Professionalism Peer Review Publication4 KB (438 words) - 13:06, 4 December 2020
- technology, and pedagogy. This journal has a three-stage peer review process. researchers Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities440 bytes (41 words) - 13:30, 21 October 2020
- researchers is often equivalent to the production and acceptance of peer-reviewed manuscripts. In fact, the number of publications a researcher has is8 KB (1,039 words) - 18:49, 25 March 2021
- unrealistic promises regarding the speed of the peer review process (hinting that the journal's peer review process is minimal or non-existent)—or boasts9 KB (1,354 words) - 17:40, 26 March 2021
- and ways in which those disciplines are valuable to the society. Peer reviewers Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities540 bytes (50 words) - 13:10, 21 October 2020
- energy healing methodology used. EditorsPeer reviewersResearchers Education Open About Post-publication peer review Replicability COPE Reliability Reproducability846 bytes (68 words) - 16:10, 18 June 2021
- post-publication peer-review and concerted efforts of responsible scientists. Journal editorsResearchers Post-publication peer review Selective citation998 bytes (84 words) - 12:47, 6 April 2021
- researcher is rejected for funding without deception. ResearchersFundersPeer reviewers Peer review Reliability Honesty Communication Research methods841 bytes (84 words) - 21:26, 22 October 2020
- data management, mentor and trainee roles, as well as authorship and peer review. The book ends with possible reasons and obstacles to responsible conduct1 KB (124 words) - 10:19, 13 May 2020
- Procrastinating Researcher Delegates Grant Reviews to Trainee (section Procrastinating Researcher Delegates Grant Reviews to Trainee)researchersFunders Cases Open About Fake peer-reviewing Peer review Reliability Accountability Funders' responsibilities Peer Review Mentor-trainee relationship875 bytes (61 words) - 13:56, 6 April 2021
- Practices and Responsible Authorship; Mentor/Trainee Responsibilities; Peer Review; Collaborative Science. Doctoral studentsEarly career researchersPhD StudentsResearch2 KB (133 words) - 20:36, 20 September 2020
- COPE seminar, webinar and ppt presentation (section 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper)Inappropriate authorship Peer review card game Standards of authorship COPE Editorial Board Member for Research Integrity & Peer Review United Kingdom Publication1 KB (119 words) - 11:13, 28 October 2020
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available (section Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available)process of peer review involves a thorough evaluation of the research methodology and findings by experts or colleagues in the field (“peers”). The main9 KB (1,314 words) - 17:30, 27 October 2021
- four World Conferences on Research Integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(1), p.17. Bouter, L.M., Tijdink, J., Axelsen, N., Martinson, B.C. and2 KB (310 words) - 15:28, 13 July 2021
- susceptible to fraud than other disciplines. They also evaluate whether the peer review process and replications work well in practice to detect fraud. This is1 KB (131 words) - 19:11, 25 October 2020
- four World Conferences on Research Integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2016 Dec 1;1(1):17. An appropriate, transparent, and meticulous study3 KB (392 words) - 23:00, 27 October 2020
- basic principles and standards for all peer-reviewers. They can be applied across disciplines. Peer reviewers Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities457 bytes (35 words) - 22:48, 24 October 2020
- relationship Data management Collaborative research Conflict of interest Peer review Moral reasoning Social responsibilities530 bytes (42 words) - 16:44, 13 March 2020
- research ENRIO Europe Authorship Plagiarism Mentor/trainee relationship Peer review Data management Conflict of interest Questionable research practice Research474 bytes (36 words) - 15:04, 26 May 2020
- concerns responsible authorship and peer review and raises questions on ethical challenges that both authors and peer reviewers often face. The quick guide622 bytes (61 words) - 13:41, 25 September 2020
- publishing monographs process: optional proposal, submission, internal review, peer review, copy editing, production and publication. One of the HIRMEOS objectives6 KB (746 words) - 10:05, 19 October 2021
- management Conflict of interest Financial responsibilities Whistleblowing Peer review Copyright738 bytes (71 words) - 13:17, 28 September 2020
- stakeholders in research COPE United Kingdom Authorship Publication ethics Peer review Conflict of interest Intellectual property Data management Allegations691 bytes (67 words) - 09:34, 27 May 2020
- researcher must face a review board when he has not finished his assignment. FundersSupervisorsReviewers Cases Open About Fake peer-reviewing Reliability Accountability567 bytes (34 words) - 14:19, 6 April 2021
- online archives or repositories that contain research papers before their peer review and publication. Their main aim is to accelerate dissemination process10 KB (1,346 words) - 11:20, 26 May 2021
- trainee relationship; publication practices and responsible authorship; peer review; collaborative science; research on humans; research on laboratory animals;2 KB (215 words) - 11:11, 28 October 2020
- four World Conferences on Research Integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(1), p.17. Integrity in analysis and reporting of results is important4 KB (556 words) - 10:06, 28 October 2020
- sourceHistory Find out Resources Cases This is a factual case. Researchers Peer review Respect Accountability REC approval Informed consent Institutional Responsibilities524 bytes (26 words) - 18:57, 25 October 2020
- center 2015 United States Data management Research with Humans Authorship Peer review Grant applications Mentor/trainee relationship Research with Animals Biomedical761 bytes (68 words) - 14:48, 1 October 2020
- Hazardous substances Research with Humans Mentor/trainee relationship Peer review Data management Whistleblowing Biomedical sciences PE - Physical Sciences880 bytes (79 words) - 14:34, 1 October 2020
- Ethical decision making Authorship Research misconduct Whistleblowing Peer review Research with animals Intellectual property811 bytes (71 words) - 11:30, 9 November 2020
- United States honesty Reliability Mentor/trainee relationship Plagiarism Peer review Collaborative research Research with Humans Data management Social responsibilities916 bytes (78 words) - 13:04, 29 September 2020