Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

Sabotage and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct + (This article and the discussed case highli … This article and the discussed case highlight the importance of a concise and comprehensive definition of research misconduct in order to assure a proper handling of respective accusations. The case described may be seen exemplary of the implications a definition of research misconduct may have.efinition of research misconduct may have.)
U.S. Finds Misconduct by Ex-Researchers at Chicago and UCSF + (This article may be used as a source of case studies in the context of research integrity training.)
Ten short cases on publication ethics + (This article presents short cases about publication ethics that can be used in training sessions and to teach research ethics and integrity to researchers.)
SCImago Journal Rankings + (This bibliometric indicator is criteria wh … This bibliometric indicator is criteria when it comes to ranking of scientific journals based on quality. There are many journals which are indexed only on Scopus and can be validated by using SJR, as Impact factor (IF) considers only ISI Web of Science data '"`UNIQ--ref-00000094-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--ref-00000095-QINU`"'. Both Web of Science and Scopus database use basically same model of clasification which commites on two levels, first one would be a number of areas and second one subject categories '"`UNIQ--ref-00000096-QINU`"'. Improvements regarding SJR towards IF are that SJR counts citations in a given year to documents in 3-year publication window, every citation is not of equal value meaning that citations cited by more prestigious journals have more influence, last but not the least would be that Scopus is bigger database than Web of Sciences thus it takes into acocunt more journals '"`UNIQ--ref-00000097-QINU`"'. Meaning that this database ensures not only mesaurament of popularity or impact of certain journal, bit it rather takes into acocunt the prestige of journal and the prestige of the citing journal as well. Another great advantage of this database is that it is free of any charge '"`UNIQ--ref-00000098-QINU`"'.'"`UNIQ--references-00000099-QINU`"'U`"'. '"`UNIQ--references-00000099-QINU`"')
Promoting Integrity as an Integral Dimension of Excellence in Research (Policy brief) + (This brief matters because it addresses th … This brief matters because it addresses the persistent gap between integrity policies (written rules) and how research is actually conducted. By insisting that integrity be integral to how research is organised, governed, evaluated, and rewarded, it helps reduce hypocrisy, confusion, and perverse incentives. Embedding integrity at institutional and systemic levels makes research more trustworthy, robust, and aligned with public expectations. Moreover, clarifying concepts and procedures reduces ambiguity and legal risk, supporting fair, transparent, and consistent integrity governance across institutions and nations.overnance across institutions and nations.)
Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement + (This can create wrong impressions with respect to contributions, intentions, and influences with respect to a contribution. Hence, it can mislead the reader.)
How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper + (This case clearly demonstrates how researc … This case clearly demonstrates how researchers could be drawn into questionable practices involving commercial parties, and provides best practices for dealing with these situations. Professor Aspenberg is not embarrased to admit that he was nearly commiting a questionable practice and speaks out so that others would not repeat his mistake.'"`UNIQ--references-00000091-QINU`"'take. '"`UNIQ--references-00000091-QINU`"')
An author realized a paper had plagiarized his thesis. It took the journal four years to retract it. + (This case demonstrates that even famous journals might publish plagiarised material. It also shows that sometimes it might take years before a flawed article is retracted.)
Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent + (This case demonstrates that it sometimes c … This case demonstrates that it sometimes can be difficult to distinguish scientific misconduct from scientific errors. It shows that the definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways and it shows the importance of education of scientist to prevent ‘unintentional scientific misconduct’ and improve research integrity.isconduct’ and improve research integrity.)
From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark + (This case highlights the importance of inv … This case highlights the importance of involving diverse actors in misconduct investigations. The article explains that it was considered important to represent a broad spectrum of health sciences on the committee because decisions on honesty/dishonesty due to their inherently inexact and judgmental nature must reflect the general culture of the research environment.'"`UNIQ--ref-000000D9-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--references-000000DA-QINU`"'NU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-000000DA-QINU`"')
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication + (This case is another reminder of the many … This case is another reminder of the many different formats plagiarism can take. It also demonstrates that not every single case that appears to be plagiarism is actually a research misconduct practice. The case explores the fine lines among practices such as ‘quoting oneself’, ‘duplicate submission/publication’, ‘plagiarism’, ‘deviation from accepted practices’, ‘reprints’, and when such practices are acceptable or not.when such practices are acceptable or not.)
A Letter of Resignation + (This case is one of several examples - presented in this blog site - on how sexual misconduct can violate the ECCRI's principles and good practices in work spaces of academia.)
Duty to Report Ethical Violations of Others + (This case raises the question of when does … This case raises the question of when does one act with integrity in research? And where does one’s responsibility lie when it comes to research violations performed by others? It is also a firm reminder of the different power dynamics and positions held in an institution when it comes to reporting misconduct or, as in this case, whistleblowing.nduct or, as in this case, whistleblowing.)
Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism + (This case shows an example of how the research organisations could address research misconduct cases and how journals address these cases.)
Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration + (This case study can help researchers identify practical issues and challenges they might come across in collaborations.)
European Geosciences Union (EGU) Code of Conduct + (This code of conduct aims to promote ethical integrity and an inclusive, constructive and positive approach to science by outlining the expected and required behaviour of members and participants of EGU activities.)
European Nuclear Society (ENS) Ethical Charter + (This code of conduct details the core ethical standards that apply to professionals from industry, the academic world, research centres and authorities in the field of nuclear science.)
European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Code of Conduct + (This code of conduct explicitly defines appropriate conduct for members and affiliates of the ECPR.)
European Astronomical Society (EAS) Ethics Statement and Guidelines for Good Practice + (This code of conduct lays out ethical standards for the behaviour of those affiliated with the EAS, and astronomers in Europe more generally.)
Federation of European Pharmacological Societies (EPHAR) Ethical Code of Conduct + (This code of conduct lays out general principles that those pariticipating in EPHAR activities must abide by.)
European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Code of Ethics + (This code of conduct lays out the ways in which those affiliated with the EAACI should behave in order to support the broader goals of the society.)
European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice + (This code of conduct outlines standards of conduct for members of the EAA to follow in fulfilling their responsibilities, both to the community and to their professional colleagues.)
European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work + (This code of conduct outlines standards of conduct for archaeologists involved in contract work in Europe.)
European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice for Fieldwork Training + (This code of conduct outlines standards of conduct for fieldwork training for archaeologists in Europe.)
European Mathematical Society (EMS) Code of Practice + (This code of conduct outlines the reposnsibilities of mathematicians, as well as all who are concerned with the publication, dissemination, and assessment of mathematical research in Europe.)

Case Studies For Small Group Discussion + (This collection of cases is useful for organizing group discussions.)

UNDERSTANDING AND ACTING FOR A HEALTHY PLASTIC FREE MEDITERRANEAN SEA, e-learning + (This course is important for a range of st … This course is important for a range of stakeholders: environmental researchers and marine scientists who study pollution and ecosystems; professionals and policymakers in maritime sectors like fisheries, shipping, tourism, aquaculture; NGOs or civil-society actors concerned with ocean conservation; educators and citizen-science advocates seeking to raise awareness about plastic pollution; and anyone involved in blue-economy development, circular economy, or sustainable marine resource management especially in Mediterranean countries.nt especially in Mediterranean countries.)
Declaration of Geneva + (This declaration serves as an adaptation o … This declaration serves as an adaptation of the Hippocratic Oath to modern medicine. The declaration is a core document for medical ethics and, in many countries, it is even part of the medical profession code. The Biomedical Alliance in Europe and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology endorse the Declaration of Geneva in their codes of conduct and ethics, respectively.codes of conduct and ethics, respectively.)
Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain) + (This document contains principles relating … This document contains principles relating to both authorship and editorial reviews. Besides explaining the underlying principles such as impartiality, confidentiality and honesty, it also provides practical guidance on how to conduct reviews, communicating acceptance and rejection, paper retractions and withdrawals, etc. It also sets down principles for acknowledging authors and contributors.or acknowledging authors and contributors.)
Italian National Research Center Guidelines for Integrity in Research + (This document describes the research integrity framework for National Research Center institutes.)
Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement + (This document emphasises that responsibili … This document emphasises that responsibility for ethical research lies with everyone who is active in research, but especially with leaders in research performing organisations. Researchers’ morals alone cannot ensure research integrity; good conditions for exercising integrity must also be created at the level of the organisation and the research system. the organisation and the research system.)
The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct + (This document gives a concise overview of … This document gives a concise overview of what constitutes scientific misconduct with regard to grant applications, the prerequisites for misconduct proceedings, and the proceedings themselves. It elaborates on the duties of the research institution in case misconduct proceedings need to be initiated, and specifies when the SNCF will step in. and specifies when the SNCF will step in.)
UKRIO's Good practice in internet-mediated research + (This document highlights some of the key e … This document highlights some of the key ethical and regulatory issues in internet research, such as personal data protection, maintaining confidentiality and what constitutes informed consent. While it does not aim to be prescriptive, it intend to encourage further debate and exploration of these challenging areas.nd exploration of these challenging areas.)
The German Council of Science and Humanities ' Recommendations on Academic Integrity + (This document identifies makes recommendations concerning the following areas: enabling academic integrity, publication process, dealing with disputes, evaluations and assessment and responsibilities of various stakeholders.)
A Data Governance Framework for Ethnography + (This document is a guide for regulatory co … This document is a guide for regulatory compliance in ethnography. Ethnography is a pillar of social-scientific research, and it is important to provide stakeholders with guidelines on how ethnographic research complies with current regulations. As a result, this document can help stakeholders to create their own data regulation plans and instruct them on the ethical compliance of ethnographic research.hical compliance of ethnographic research.)
Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Position Paper on Research Integrity Officer Role & Reporting + (This document is important for RIOs and research institutions, as it describes the extent and limits of the RIO's responsibilities.)
Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS) + (This document lays down prerequisites that … This document lays down prerequisites that need to be upheld by all researchers and research institutions that are supported by the CSIC. It is divided into 4 domains: principles of research, the researcher as a science professional, publications and communication and institutional framework. The legal bases for these good conduct practices are included in the Annex.nduct practices are included in the Annex.)
The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research Consultation paper – Research Ethics in Norway + (This document proposes changes in seven ar … This document proposes changes in seven areas of the Research Ethics Act:- Statutory stipulation of the research ethics responsibility of research institutions -Changes to the system for processing research ethics cases - Institutions' reasoned opinions in research ethics cases - Changes in the Commission's composition and mandate - A clarification of the Research Ethics Act's definition of scientific misconduct - Deferred public access during the processing of ethical issues at an institution - The institutions' prerogative to preserve the anonymity of the reporter to preserve the anonymity of the reporter)
The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Guide to Integrity and Responsibility in Research Practices + (This document, in addition to making refer … This document, in addition to making references to laws and principles, includes sections on most practical issues encountered in research such as research planning and management, data generation and protection, work relations, supervision of students, contracts, intellectual property and preventing misconduct. As such, it is a valuable handbook to all those practicing research in France.o all those practicing research in France.)
Scandalous behaviour at Medical University of Innsbruck + (This editorial highlights that the lack of an official national body responsible for addressing issues of scientific misconduct contributes to an inefficient and disorganised workflow in dealing with cases of misconduct.)
Five cases considered and concluded by the UK's General Medical Council + (This editorial provides information about possible consequences of research misconduct in various medical disciplines in the UK.)
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise + (This factual anonymised case shows that pl … This factual anonymised case shows that plagiarism can come in more than one formats. The case adds to the real-world examples of plagiarism scenarios that research integrity officers may encounter.Examples are useful for recognizing, highlight, and avoiding plagiary.gnizing, highlight, and avoiding plagiary.)
Copy and paste: A slow university investigation into serious accusations of misconduct benefits no one + (This factual case demonstrates that there … This factual case demonstrates that there may be a significant time lapse between the noticing and reporting of a case of plagiarism (or indeed, other research ethics violation) to the appropriate resolution of such cases.The article discusses solutions on shortening the investigation time for allegations in Universities as well as ways to encourage universities sticking to their own misconduct enquiry timelines and policies.misconduct enquiry timelines and policies.)
Dutch psychology fraudster avoids trial + (This factual case shows the magnitude of the penalties that can be issued on some confirmed cases of research ethics violations .)
Disclosing Research Findings + (This fictional case is a firm reminder of … This fictional case is a firm reminder of the plurality of types of conflicts of interest one can come across in their research life. The case is presented alongside questions that provide a starting point for reflection on the dilemmas faced by researchers in relation to their contractual responsibilities as well as moral obligations when working in a team. moral obligations when working in a team.)
Inspiring and Anchoring Trust in Science, Research and Innovation (Policy Brief), 2022 + (This first set of policy briefs is importa … This first set of policy briefs is important because it operationalizes the concept of trust in science by turning abstract ideals like transparency, accountability, and responsiveness into concrete, evidence-informed policy guidance. Through co-creation and stakeholder engagement, the briefs help ensure that science policy is more attuned to societal values and concerns, not just expert agendas. Such alignment is crucial to counter growing skepticism and distrust toward scientific institutions. Furthermore, the recommendations provided can guide decision-makers, funders, and institutions in embedding trust-enhancing practices into research governance. In doing so, the briefs help lay the groundwork for more legitimate, resilient, and socially robust science policy in the future.ially robust science policy in the future.)
Policy Brief 1: Glossary for Academic Integrity + (This glossary is important because a lack … This glossary is important because a lack of consensus on what constitutes academic integrity and misconduct undermines efforts to prevent and address violations. Without shared definitions, institutions may interpret behaviors inconsistently, leading to unfairness, confusion, and weak enforcement. The glossary helps harmonize understanding across borders and disciplines, supporting fair and transparent integrity practices. By offering a common terminological basis, it aids educators, students, policy makers, and integrity offices in communication, training, and policy implementation. Over time, it can foster more consistent handling of misconduct and strengthen a culture of integrity in higher education and research.ntegrity in higher education and research.)
PREPARED Recommendations for expediting ethics review during times of crisis + (This guidance is crucial because it enable … This guidance is crucial because it enables faster ethics reviews during health crises without sacrificing ethical standards. By streamlining processes and promoting collaboration, it ensures urgent research can proceed quickly while protecting participants and maintaining scientific integrity. This balance is vital for generating trustworthy, timely evidence needed to respond effectively to emergencies and uphold public confidence.Click [https://prepared-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Recommendations-for-expediting-ethics-review-during-times-of-crisis.pdf here] to open the guideline. [[File:Https---prepared-project.eu-wp-content-uploads-2024-03-Recommendations-for-expediting-ethics-review-during-times-of-crisis.pdf.png|left|https://prepared-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Recommendations-for-expediting-ethics-review-during-times-of-crisis.pdf|alt=https://prepared-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Recommendations-for-expediting-ethics-review-during-times-of-crisis.pdf]][[File:Https---prepared-project.eu-wp-content-uploads-2024-03-Recommendations-for-expediting-ethics-review-during-times-of-crisis.pdf.png|left|https://prepared-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Recommendations-for-expediting-ethics-review-during-times-of-crisis.pdf|alt=https://prepared-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Recommendations-for-expediting-ethics-review-during-times-of-crisis.pdf]])
Guidance for Fair and Fast Desk Assessment of Submitted Manuscripts During Times of Crisis + (This guidance is important because it ensu … This guidance is important because it ensures that urgent research during crises, such as pandemics, is reviewed both quickly and ethically. In emergencies, time-sensitive studies must be assessed and published fast but without compromising scientific integrity or participant protection. The document helps ethics committees and editors make fair, transparent decisions under pressure by offering clear procedures and tools. It reduces the risk of rushed or biased judgments, supports collaboration among institutions, and promotes public trust in crisis-related research. Ultimately, it balances speed with ethical rigor, ensuring that life-saving knowledge can be shared responsibly when it's needed most. shared responsibly when it's needed most.)
The French National Research Agency's Policy for Ethics and Research Integrity + (This guideline describes the roles of three stakeholders: funders, those who evaluate proposals and those who carry out research- in ensuring adherence to RI standards.)
Polish Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies' Good Scientific Research Practice Recommendations + (This guideline emphasized the role of rese … This guideline emphasized the role of research institutions in fostering research integrity, since they are in a position to detect misconduct at an early stage. For institutions and administrators, it describes the extent of responsibilities towards researchers, especially early career researchers.hers, especially early career researchers.)