Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• Questionable Research Practices in Study Design  + (Early career researchers)
• Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review  + (Reserchers)
• The University of Oslo's 10 commandements for ethical practice in research  + (Reserchers)
• The Dublin City University's Code of Good Research Practice  + (Academic staff)
• Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Report on Fostering a Climate of Excellence for Irish Research  + (Reserchers)
• The decision on ice  + (health care professionals)
• Biobanking: Technology Basics  + (Academic institutions)
• Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals  + (Research funding organisations)
• Hostile peer review  + (Scientists)
• Perverse incentives  + (Students)
• Self-plagiarism  + (Students)
• 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper  + (Researchers)
• Post-publication peer review  + (Journal editors)
• Image Integrity  + (Researchers)
• The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity  + (Senior researchers)
• Peer review card game  + (phd students)
• Peer review  + (Scientists)
• Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity  + (Researchers)
• Research misconduct  + (Students)
• Selective citation  + (Students)
• Procrastinating Reviewer  + (Funders)
• Attempting to Assure Accuracy  + (Journal publishers)
• Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement  + (Academic staff)
• Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking”  + (Authors)
• Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain)  + (Researchers)
• VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Policymakers  + (Government)

• Doing research with communities affected by climate change: Climate-conscious methodologies matrix (for students and citizen scientists)  + (Science communicators)
• VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Communicators  + (Science communicators)

• POIESIS Recommendations 7, 8, 9: Science Communication and Chains of Mediation  + (Researchers and Research Institutions)
• POIESIS Policy Recommendations for Promoting Trust in Science through Integrity, Integration, and Communication  + (Academic institutions)
• Trust in science , the perspective of European policy makers- Policy Brief  + (Government science and innovation policy makers)
• Predatory publishing  + (PhD Students)
• Altmetrics  + (PhD students)
• Legal rights of accused scientists  + (Scientists)
• Declaration of Helsinki  + (PhD Students)
• Universal Declaration of Human Rights  + (PhD Students)
• Peer review  + (Scientists)
• Research metrics  + (phd students)
• On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research  + (Researchers)
• Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors  + (Students)
• Hostile peer review  + (Scientists)
• P-value hacking  + (Students)
• Perverse incentives  + (Students)
• Self-plagiarism  + (Students)
• Whistleblower protection/rights  + (PhD Students)
• Polarized research  + (PhD Students)
• Supervision  + (phd students)
• Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)  + (Students)
• Authorship criteria  + (PhD students)
• German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice  + (researchers)
• Research misconduct  + (Students)
• Balancing harms and benefits  + (All stakeholders in research)