Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

The Middle Position + (An interactive game that teaches you about the concept of virtue ethics, and about the middle position!)
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) + (An international convention that aims to p … An international convention that aims to protect the rights and freedom of people across Europe. In the convention, several articles protect basic human rights. Not only it protects basic rights such as the right to life, the right to a fair trial, but it also prevents harmful action by declaring the right to freedom from torture, freedom from slavery, among others.rture, freedom from slavery, among others.)
Bioethics: an introduction + (An introductory series by Marianne Talbot exploring bioethical theories and their philosophical foundations. These podcasts will explain key moral theories, common moral arguments, and some background logic'"`UNIQ--ref-0000003E-QINU`"'.)
The Hazardous Consent Forms + (Anthropologist discovers that nurses who a … Anthropologist discovers that nurses who are supposed to be obtaining signed consent for a study from the female heroin users who are the subject of the study are obtaining verbal consent instead, as the subjects are reluctant to sign an admission of legal wrong-doing. The anthropologst debates whether to hide the lack of signed consent from the Institutional Review Board in order to protect his subjects (as he sees it) and continue the resarch. (as he sees it) and continue the resarch.)
Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage + (Archaeological heritage is any vestige of … Archaeological heritage is any vestige of human activity, in any form of remains, that is associated with a great cultural load. This charter is aimed at the global management and protection of archaeological heritage, by targeting all the stakeholders involved in such discipline, from governments, researchers, to enterprises, and the general public.s, to enterprises, and the general public.)
Site Unseen + (Archaeologists with permission to enter pr … Archaeologists with permission to enter private land notice and record a site of historical and prehistorical importance. The landowner, who had given permission for them to enter his land, later informs them that he hates the federal government and doesn't want this site recorded. They submit the site information to the Bureau of Land Maangement so that the information will not be lost. so that the information will not be lost.)
Successful and timely uptake of artificial intelligence in science in the EU + (Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies … Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies are one of the most disruptive general purpose applications at the service of research and innovation. It acts as a catalyst for scientific breakthroughs and is rapidly becoming a key instrument in the scientific process in all areas of research. In this Scientific Opinion (SO) the Group of Chief Scientific Advisors examines how the European Commission can accelerate the responsible take-up of artificial intelligence in science in the European Union. It focuses on a responsible uptake of AI in science – including providing access to highquality AI, respecting European values, and strengthening the position of Europe in science to boost innovation and prosperity in the EU. This SO is published in the context of the Scientific Advice Mechanism which provides independent scientific evidence and policy recommendations to the European institutions by request of the College of Commissioners.y request of the College of Commissioners.)
AI Generated Content + (Artificial Intelligence is a broad term, w … Artificial Intelligence is a broad term, with applications that are not all relevant to issues concerning research and research integrity. AI Generated Content refers in this instance to texts, academic or otherwise, that are either produced by or in collaboration with AI tools like Chat GPT that use Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate text. These tools can be used in research, and raise interesting questions relating to authorship.eresting questions relating to authorship.)
The French National Research Agency's Policy for Ethics and Research Integrity + (As France's largest public research fundin … As France's largest public research funding organization, the ANR plays an important role in setting the tone of research and scientific integrity. This document sets out the main ethical principles underlying research integrity, and the responsibilities of various stakeholders to ensure integrity in research.keholders to ensure integrity in research.)
Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) + (As a PhD student in academia, there are di … As a PhD student in academia, there are difficulties you may encounter in the area of integrity, such as power relations and issues around social safety, authorship, intellectual property, and ensuring academic quality. How can you properly determine the order of authorship? In what way can social safety be improved? How do others deal with integrity issues?The MOOC "Responsible Conduct of Research" will take you through these topics and provide ideas on how to become a responsible researcher, who feels empowered by knowledge of integrity. 6 modules will guide you in 7 hours through important topics, including examples, a lecture, expert views and experiences and the opportunity to investigate your own research practice. [[File:Mooc video.png.png|center|frame]]A certificate will be provided to participants who completed every part. This course was developed in the [https://community.embassy.science/c/integrity/26 H2020 INTEGRITY project] by Mariëtte van den Hoven, Miriam van Loon, Hesther van Gulick and Eline Borsboom, and funded by EU H2020.nd Eline Borsboom, and funded by EU H2020.)
Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) + (As a part of the Open Science movement, th … As a part of the Open Science movement, this cross-publisher initiative aims to promote open and unrestricted availability of scholarly publications’ abstracts. This particularly refers to journal articles and book chapters. Wider availability of abstracts could result in increasing discoverability and attracting readers to the full text.'"`UNIQ--ref-000006A5-QINU`"'he full text.'"`UNIQ--ref-000006A5-QINU`"')
Research ethics committee conditions: Ethical challenges of researching with poor communities in Malawi + (As an international academic team we have … As an international academic team we have been engaged with researching African household and young people’s livelihood trajectories in a Malawian village since 2007. Intermittently over more than a decade we have conducted surveys, interviews and participatory research with many of the young and adult residents of that small rural community, thereby building up a detailed knowledge of the community and developing extensive personal relations with individuals and families.l relations with individuals and families.)
Monitoring funding processes + (As funders are an important stakeholder in … As funders are an important stakeholder in many research projects, they often monitor the research process. The funder can decide to monitor the project closely, to have standard protocols in place (e.g. for research misconduct or changing research methods), and to evaluate a project. Prior to the commencement of a project, there should be agreement between the research funding organization (RFO) and the research performing organization (RPO) on how the project will be monitored.RPO) on how the project will be monitored.)
Image manipulation as a general practice + (As managing editor, I view all manuscripts … As managing editor, I view all manuscripts before they are assigned to an editor. Within a 4 week period, I have detected five manuscripts where photographs of either gels or plant materials were used twice or three times in the same manuscript. These manuscripts were immediately rejected.However, we are not convinced that these are cases of deliberate misleading of the scientific community. It rather seems to us that many laboratories consider photographs as illustrations that can be manipulated, and not as original data. Thus gels are often cleaned of impurities, bands are cut out and photographs of plant material only serve to show what the authors want to demonstrate, and the material does not necessarily originate from the experiment in question.When the editor-in-chief rejected such a manuscript, a typical response was: “I am surprised by the question and problem you pointed out in our manuscript. I checked the pictures you mentioned and I agree that they are really identical. But please be reminded that the purpose of these gel pictures was only to show the different types of banding pattern, and the gels of a few specific types were not very clear, so my PhD student repeatedly used the clearer ones. This misleading usage does not have an influence on data statistics or the final conclusion”. data statistics or the final conclusion”.)
Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold + (As the complexity of scientific investigat … As the complexity of scientific investigation has advanced, bio‐medical research has progressively adopted a team‐based approach to research. In the life sciences, brain imaging is one of the most technically advanced and integrative disciplines. In this collaborative environment, scientific disagreements as well as inter‐personal conflicts inevitably arise. Investigators may disagree, for example, on the adequacy of the data for publication, the most appropriate analyses to be performed, or the appropriate conclusions to be drawn from the accumulated experiments. In the context of such disagreements, more fundamental disputes often arise, including the right of individual investigators to publish data acquired cooperatively. When efforts are made to publish disputed data, journal editors necessarily become involved.urnal editors necessarily become involved.)
Developing an ethical and reflexive mindset in emerging childhood researchers. + (As thinking and practice has grown around … As thinking and practice has grown around ethical research involving children, so too has the need to train and equip new researchers with relevant knowledge and the associated mindsets. However, developing a comprehensive training program on ethical research involving children can be a complex task. When I (Daniella Bendo) took up an Assistant Professor position at King’s University College (at Western University) Canada last year, I developed a third-year undergraduate unit entitled, ‘Researching Childhood (in Childhood and Social Institutions).’ The ERIC materials were invaluable in providing an established, rights-based framework for the course, as well as a wealth of material and resources to draw upon in the lectures and tutorials. In terms of assessment, I sought a way to draw the students’ learning together and ask them to demonstrate their theoretical and practical understanding of ethical issues in research involving children, in what was, otherwise, a theoretical unit. Based on the many real-life case studies on the ERIC website, I set students the assignment of developing their own hypothetical case study. Here, one of our students, Paige Sheridan, shares the approach she took with this assignment. The depth of her ethical understanding is evident in the reflexive detail of her case study and, while hypothetical, the five-step process she describes would likely be a useful tool to consider in research practice.ful tool to consider in research practice.)
BT Cotton Hoax in a University in India + (Based on a news from Times of India (TOI), … Based on a news from Times of India (TOI), a study regarding the development of a new indigenous gene was completely fake. The gene that was stated is a new variety of Bt Cotton or Bt gene (BNla106 truncated cry1 AC). Hence, the project team responsible for the study claimed that they had already developed a new variety of Bt cotton seeds. However, experts found that the construct of Bt cotton has a Monsanto gene (Mon-531), which exemplifies that the cotton seeds was never altered or still it is the common seed. Moreover, the variety of BT cotton was already brought in the public in the year 2008 and the paper work of the UAS was published in the Current Science regardless of dubious claims that was later found out and thus, the published work was later on withdrawn (dated December 25, 2007). In 2012, the Monsanto gene was introduced by the media through a UAS staffer that it was indeed present and was never altered at all. Furthermore, it was found out through a 129-page report that a scope was contaminated due to the seeds being mass multiplied.ed due to the seeds being mass multiplied.)
KFPE Guide - 11 Principles & 7 Questions + (Based on an extensive consultation process … Based on an extensive consultation process, this guide published by the Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships with Developing Countries (KFPE) offers guidelines for researchers, policymakers and organisations who want to create and maintain collaborative research partnerships across boundaries and cultures. The 11 principles are meant to underscore what is important in the process of developing these partnerships, while the 7 questions are meant to help participants better understand the partnerships they are involved in.and the partnerships they are involved in.)
Plagiarism, Voluntary Settlement Agreements and Public Health Service Grants + (Based on an investigation conducted by Rus … Based on an investigation conducted by Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, the Office for Research Integrity found that an Associate Professor in Immunology/Microbiology engaged in scientific misconduct involving two instances of plagiarism in publications related to two Public Health Service (PHS) grants.to two Public Health Service (PHS) grants.)
UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights + (Based on the Universal Declaration of Huma … Based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is a treaty that encourages its parties to respect and promote civil and political rights of individuals, such as freedom of speech, assembly and religion and the right to life, self-determination. The treaty has 53 articles divided into 6 parts.eaty has 53 articles divided into 6 parts.)
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress + (Because of structural imperatives that ove … Because of structural imperatives that overemphasize the good of efficiency (number of publications, h-index), researchers may feel it is not possible to do justice to principles and values related to research integrity (e.g. taking time in order to improve the quality of one publication, rather than publishing as much as possible). In such a situation, a researcher experiences cognitive dissonance and moral distress. The psychological notion of cognitive dissonance refers to the mental discomfort experienced by someone who holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values. The ethical concept of moral distress denotes the experience of a person who knows what is the right thing to do, but is (or feels) unable to act accordingly.t is (or feels) unable to act accordingly.)
Consent for publication (Author) + (Before submitting an article to a journal, … Before submitting an article to a journal, all authors must approve the manuscript and give their consent for submission and publication.'"`UNIQ--ref-0000065E-QINU`"' Disregarding this principle can lead to some legal issues and in some cases to retraction of the article.'"`UNIQ--references-0000065F-QINU`"'icle. '"`UNIQ--references-0000065F-QINU`"')
Alliance of German Science Organisations' Principles for the Handling of Research Data + (Besides the German National Research Found … Besides the German National Research Foundation (DFG), other prominent research organizations such as the Alliance of German Science Organisations have also created codes and guidelines that deal with specific topics. This document addresses the importance of good data management practices and the principles therein.ment practices and the principles therein.)
Interim Practice Work + (Between the first and the second face-to-f … Between the first and the second face-to-face group sessions trainees facilitate the 5 exercises experienced during the first part of the face-to-face sessions ([https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:64cb2917-6ee4-44ca-ad3b-b998bc6786ea Self-Declaration Approach]; [https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:Ac206152-effd-475b-b8cd-7e5861cb65aa Debate and Dialogue]; [https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:747f4d61-3c97-4c4b-acd9-4d69c95f134b Virtues and Norms]; [https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:522ba3d0-9f26-41d5-9ecf-b4c88214887c The middle position]; and [https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:A0dd2e82-52e7-4030-a396-54525630e75c Dilemma game]). In order to learn about their experience and prepare for the last face to face group session trainers need to collect and analyse the '''[https://www.dropbox.com/s/1fmppqv189jxlqj/Self%20reflection%20form.pdf?dl=0 self reflection forms]'''. This will support trainers in understanding which issues should be addressed and which exercises need more practice during the last session of the training.e during the last session of the training.)
BEYOND + (Beyond Bad Apples: Towards a Behavioural and Evidence-Based Approach to Promote Research Ethics and Research Integrity in Europe)

Fraud and dishonesty in "scientific" publication + (Briefly discussing several cases of scientific misconduct.)

Erdemler ve Normlar + (Bu alıştırma, erdemlerle ilgili kavramlar … Bu alıştırma, erdemlerle ilgili kavramlar ve bu kavramların uygulamayla olan ilişkisi üzerine fikir yürütmek yoluyla insanları Araştırma Doğruluğu (AD) vakaları ve ikilemleri üzerine düşünmeye teşvik etmeyi amaçlamaktadır[2]. Alıştırmada, erdemler üzerine araştırma doğruluğu bağlamında fikir yürütülmekte ve erdemler eylem normları haline dönüştürülmektedir. Bu alıştırma erdemlerin AD için önemini ve nasıl uygulamaya dökülebileceğini anlamaya yardımcı olmaktadır.ulamaya dökülebileceğini anlamaya yardımcı olmaktadır.)
Münazara ve Diyalog + (Bu alıştırma, eğitmenlerin diğer kişilerde … Bu alıştırma, eğitmenlerin diğer kişilerde diyalog becerilerinin gelişimini teşvik etmelerine ve diyalog yoluyla fikir yürütmenin teşvik edilebilmesi için neler yapılması gerektiğini açıklamalarına yardımcı olmaktadır. Bu alıştırma, diyaloğun ve diyalog becerilerinin genel olarak yorumlama ve fikir yürütme süreçlerinin ayrılmaz bir parçası olduğu ancak Araştırma Etiği ve Doğruluğu (AED) için özellikle önem arz ettiği kabulüne dayanarak geliştirilmiştir.Bu alıştırmayı kullanarak:- Deneyimsel öğrenme yoluyla başkalarında fikir yürütme/yorumlama süreçlerini teşvik edebilecek;- Diyaloğu fikir yürütme süreçlerinde bir araç olarak kullanacak ve diyaloğun bu şekilde kullanılmasını nasıl destekleyeceğinizi/teşvik edeceğinizi öğreneceksiniz.Bu alıştırma aynı zamanda daha derinlikli fikir yürütme/yorumlama araçlarına ya da alıştırmalarına geçmeden önce bir başlangıç çalışması olarak da kullanılabilir.langıç çalışması olarak da kullanılabilir.)
Münazara ve Diyalog + (Bu alıştırma, eğitmenlerin diğer kişilerde … Bu alıştırma, eğitmenlerin diğer kişilerde diyalog becerilerinin gelişimini teşvik etmelerine ve diyalog yoluyla fikir yürütmenin teşvik edilebilmesi için neler yapılması gerektiğini açıklamalarına yardımcı olmaktadır. Bu alıştırma, diyaloğun ve diyalog becerilerinin genel olarak yorumlama ve fikir yürütme süreçlerinin ayrılmaz bir parçası olduğu ancak Araştırma Etiği ve Doğruluğu (AED) için özellikle önem arz ettiği kabulüne dayanarak geliştirilmiştir.Bu alıştırmayı kullanarak:- Deneyimsel öğrenme yoluyla başkalarında fikir yürütme/yorumlama süreçlerini teşvik edebilecek;- Diyaloğu fikir yürütme süreçlerinde bir araç olarak kullanacak ve diyaloğun bu şekilde kullanılmasını nasıl destekleyeceğinizi/teşvik edeceğinizi öğreneceksiniz.Bu alıştırma aynı zamanda daha derinlikli fikir yürütme/yorumlama araçlarına ya da alıştırmalarına geçmeden önce bir başlangıç çalışması olarak da kullanılabilir.langıç çalışması olarak da kullanılabilir.)
Münazara ve Diyalog + (Bu alıştırma, eğitmenlerin diğer kişilerde … Bu alıştırma, eğitmenlerin diğer kişilerde diyalog becerilerinin gelişimini teşvik etmelerine ve diyalog yoluyla fikir yürütmenin teşvik edilebilmesi için neler yapılması gerektiğini açıklamalarına yardımcı olmaktadır. Bu alıştırma, diyaloğun ve diyalog becerilerinin genel olarak yorumlama ve fikir yürütme süreçlerinin ayrılmaz bir parçası olduğu ancak Araştırma Etiği ve Doğruluğu (AED) için özellikle önem arz ettiği kabulüne dayanarak geliştirilmiştir.Bu alıştırmayı kullanarak:- Deneyimsel öğrenme yoluyla başkalarında fikir yürütme/yorumlama süreçlerini teşvik edebilecek;- Diyaloğu fikir yürütme süreçlerinde bir araç olarak kullanacak ve diyaloğun bu şekilde kullanılmasını nasıl destekleyeceğinizi/teşvik edeceğinizi öğreneceksiniz.Bu alıştırma aynı zamanda daha derinlikli fikir yürütme/yorumlama araçlarına ya da alıştırmalarına geçmeden önce bir başlangıç çalışması olarak da kullanılabilir.langıç çalışması olarak da kullanılabilir.)
Orta Yol + (Bu alıştırma, somut durumlarda araştırma d … Bu alıştırma, somut durumlarda araştırma doğruluğu kavramının ne ifade ettiğinin her zaman net olmadığı; özellikle de araştırma doğruluğunun risk altında olduğu somut durumlarda erdemli davranışların nasıl göründüğünün tam olarak belli olmadığı varsayımına dayanmaktadır. Erdemler genellikle iki ekstrem uç arasındaki orta nokta olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Örneğin, cesaret; korkaklık ve pervasızlık uçları arasında bulunan bir erdemdir. Bu alıştırmanın amacı, araştırma doğruluğu (AD) ile ilişkili erdemlerin günlük araştırma uygulamalarınızdaki pratik manalarının nüanslarına eleştirel bir bakış açısı sunmaktır.arına eleştirel bir bakış açısı sunmaktır.)
Öz beyan yaklaşımı, araştırmada iyiliğin farklı şekilleri üzerine fikir yürütme + (Bu alıştırma, “iyilik nedir ve nasıl kateg … Bu alıştırma, “iyilik nedir ve nasıl kategorize edilebilir?” sorusundan yola çıkarak sınıf ortamında araştırma doğruluğu üzerine fikir yürütmeyi teşvik etmek için tasarlanmıştır. İyilik türleri üzerine tartışmaya ve araştırmada iyilik kavramı üzerine fikir yürütmeye odaklanır. Bu alıştırma, daha kapsamlı ve esnek bir yaklaşım olan Öz Beyan Yaklaşımına (ÖBY) dayanarak geliştirilmiştir. Bu yaklaşımda, katılımcıların öz beyan formunda verdikleri yanıtlar, araştırma doğruluğu (AD) alanındaki spesifik bir konu üzerine geliştirilecek fikir yürütme süreçlerini yapılandırmak için kullanılır. Tartışma içerisine katılımcıların sezgilerini de dahil etmek bu yaklaşımın en ayırt edici özelliğidir. Bu format, farklı AD konularına ve farklı hedef kitlelere uygulanabilirliği ve uyarlanabilirliği açısından oldukça esnektir.rlanabilirliği açısından oldukça esnektir.)
Orta Yol + (Bu alıştırmada, klinik etik kapsamında duy … Bu alıştırmada, klinik etik kapsamında duygulara ilişkin Aristotelesçi bir ahlaki sorgulama yönteminden esinlenilmiştir. Aristoteles’e göre, erdemler iki ekstrem uç arasındaki orta nokta olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu nedenle, somut durumlarda araştırma doğruluğu kavramının ne ifade ettiği her zaman net olmayabilmektedir. Orta Yol alıştırmasının odak noktası katılımcıların araştırma doğruluğu (AD) ile ilişkili erdemlerin günlük araştırma uygulamalarındaki pratik manalarının nüanslarına eleştirel bir biçimde bakmalarını sağlamaktır. Alıştırma içerisinde katılımcılar cesaret, hesap verebilirlik, dürüstlük gibi Araştırma Doğruluğu ile ilişkili erdemler ve erdemli davranış sergilemenin ne anlama geldiği üzerine fikir yürütecektir.anlama geldiği üzerine fikir yürütecektir.)
Sertifika + (Bu eğitimi alan kişilerin, sertifikalı eği … Bu eğitimi alan kişilerin, sertifikalı eğitmen olabilmek için online ve yüz yüze dersleri tamamlamaları ve 10 araştırmacıya bu eğitimi vermeleri gerekmektedir. 10 araştırmacının eğitimi, program esnasında ya da program bittikten sonra gerçekleştirilebilir.gram bittikten sonra gerçekleştirilebilir.)
Araştırma doğruluğu konusuna giriş + (Bu interaktif modülü alarak aşağıdaki konu … Bu interaktif modülü alarak aşağıdaki konular hakkında bilgi sahibi olacaksınız:*[https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of-conduct_en.pdf Araştırmalarda Dürüstlük Konusunda Avrupa Davranış Kodu (ECoC)]: Kodun içeriğini öğrenirken aynı zamanda kodda tanımlanan iyi uygulamalar ve ihlaller üzerine de fikir yürütecek ve yorumlamalarda bulunacaksınız.*'''Sorumlu araştırma davranışı, kusurlu araştırma davranışı ve tartışmaya açık araştırma uygulamaları:''' sorumlu uygulamalar, kusurlu davranışlar ve gri alanlar arasındaki farklılıkları öğrenecek ve bunların ECoC içerisinde nasıl ele alındığına dair yorumlamalarda bulunacaksınız.*'''Araştırma davranışını etkileyen çeşitli faktörler: '''Araştırmacı olarak kendi sorumluluklarınız üzerine ve 1) bireysel araştırmacılar, 2) araştırma kültürü ve 3) araştırma sistemi düzeyinde iyi araştırma davranışlarının ihlal edilmesine yol açan muhtemel sebeplere dair fikir yürütecek ve yorumlamalarda bulunacaksınız.ürütecek ve yorumlamalarda bulunacaksınız.)
Eğitimi organize etme + (Bu kılavuz, araştırma doğruluğu konusunda eğitmenlerin eğitimine yönelik karma bir eğitim programını yürütmek için gerekli pratik talimatları içermektedir.)
Erdem etiği ve araştırma doğruluğu + (Bu modülde aşağıdaki konuları öğrenecek ve … Bu modülde aşağıdaki konuları öğrenecek ve bu konular üzerine yorumlamalarda bulunacaksınız:*'''[https://embassy.science/wiki/Theme:520b3bc7-a6ab-4617-95f2-89c9dee31c53 Erdem etiğinin] temel karakteristikleri:''' Erdem etiğine giriş niteliğinde bir video izledikten sonra erdem etiğinin konuyla ilgili karakteristiklerini özetlemeyi hedefleyen bir dizi soru yanıtlayacaksınız.*'''[https://embassy.science/wiki/Theme:17d406f9-0b0f-4325-aa2d-2fe186d5ff34 Ahlaki çatışma ve ahlaki ikilem]:''' Kavramlara ilişkin bir giriş yapıldıktan sonra sizden Rotterdam Dilemma Oyunundan alınmış birisi bir ahlaki çatışma, diğeri ise bir ahlaki ikilem içeren iki vakayı analiz etmeniz ve verilen kavramları bu vakalar üzerinde uygulamanız istenecektir.*'''Daha erdemli bir araştırmacı olma yönündeki isteğiniz:''' Modülün sonunda araştırmacı olarak genel hedefleriniz üzerine yapacağınız yorumlamaların ardından sizden, olmak (ya da dönüşmek) istediğiniz araştırmacıyı tanımlayacak en önemli üç erdemi belirlemeniz istenecektir.*'''Ahlaki örneklerin ahlaki gelişim ve erdemleri hayata geçirme üzerindeki etkisi:''' Erdemlerin nasıl öğrenildiği ve öğretildiği ve iyi bir rol model/mentor olmanın neleri gerektirdiği üzerine yapacağınız yorumlamaların ardından sizden, örnek aldığınız bir kişinin sizi daha erdemli davranmaya yönelttiği bir durumu anlatmanız istenecektir. erdemli davranmaya yönelttiği bir durumu anlatmanız istenecektir.)
Mevcut araştırma koşulları altında erdem etiğinin uygulanması + (Bu modülde aşağıdaki konuları öğrenecek ve … Bu modülde aşağıdaki konuları öğrenecek ve bu konular üzerine yorumlamalarda bulunacaksınız:*'''Araştırma ile ilgili bir bağlamda yaşadığınız bir bilişsel çelişki deneyimi: '''Bilişsel çelişkinin dinamiklerini ve araştırma süreci ile olan ilişkisini fark etmeniz konusunda size yol gösterilecektir.*'''Kendini haklı çıkarma stratejilerinin gerekliliği ve riskleri: '''Kullanma ihtimalinizin bulunduğu kendini haklı çıkarma stratejileri ve bu stratejilerin yol açabileceği olası istenmeyen sonuçlar – bilişsel önyargıların ortaya çıkması gibi – üzerine fikir yürütmeniz ve yorumlamalarda bulunmanız istenecektir.*'''Araştırma doğruluğu konusunda kendi disiplininizle en ilgili olduğunu düşündüğünüz ihlaller ve muhtemel kendini haklı çıkarma stratejileri: '''Kendi disiplininizle en ilgili olduğunu düşündüğünüz araştırma doğruluğu ihlalini belirledikten sonra sizden, farklı kendini haklı çıkarma stratejileri yazmanız istenecektir.ıkarma stratejileri yazmanız istenecektir.)
Ethical issues of involving children with disabilities in research + (By definition, children with disabilities … By definition, children with disabilities are individuals under 18 years of age who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments that, in combination with various barriers, may affect their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others. All this raises some ethical issues, connected to research, such as exclusion of children with disabilities, maladapted information giving, consent or assent and methodologies for data collection '"`UNIQ--ref-0000058C-QINU`"'. collection '"`UNIQ--ref-0000058C-QINU`"'.)
VIRT2UE Certification + (By registering for the VIRT2&lt … By registering for the VIRT2UE train-the-trainer program participants have the opportunity to become certified research integrity trainers. The certificate confirms that they are didactically skilled research integrity trainers. Participants receive the certificate when they have completed the online and the face-to-face courses and trained ten further researchers. Ideally, trainees should participate in all training sessions, practice the five exercises in the interim period between the meetings, and train 10 further researchers in at least three of the five exercises. However, these requirements can be adapted if necessary (for example in small research communities where it is difficult to find 10 interested researchers to train) and it is at the discretion of the trainer if a trainee has completed enough of the course to merit the certificate. If they feel confident about their skills, trainees can already train 10 further researchers during the interim period between the face-to-face meetings, rather than only practicing the exercises.e meetings, rather than only practicing the exercises.)
Introduction to Research Integrity + (By taking eLearning modules you will learn … By taking eLearning modules you will learn about: *'''[https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of-conduct_en.pdf The European Code of Conduct for research Integrity (ECoC)]:''' You will be introduced to the content of the code while reflecting on the good practices and breaches described in the text. *'''Responsible conduct of research, research misconduct, and questionable research practice:''' You will learn about the differences between responsible practices, misconduct and gray areas and reflect on how these are addressed in the ECoC.*'''The variety of factors that influence research behavior:''' You will be guided in a reflection about a researcher's responsibilities and the possible reasons for violations of good research conduct at the level of: 1) individual researchers, 2) the research culture, and 3) the research system., 2) the research culture, and 3) the research system.)
Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling + (By taking these eLearning modules you will learn about and reflect on: Responsible supervision, mentoring and role-modeling.)
Virtue Ethics under Current Research Conditions + (By taking these eLearning modules you will … By taking these eLearning modules you will learn about and reflect on: *'''Your experience of cognitive dissonance in a research related context:''' You will be guided in recognizing the relevance and dynamics of cognitive dissonance within the research process.*'''The necessity and risks of applying self-justification strategies:''' You will be guided and invited to reflect on the self-justification strategies you might use, and the possible unintended consequences they might lead to, like the development of cognitive biases.*'''The most relevant breaches of research integrity in your discipline and possible self-justification strategies:''' After identifying the most relevant violations of research integrity in your discipline you will be invited to write different types of self-justification strategies.ifferent types of self-justification strategies.)
Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling + (By taking these eLearning modules you will … By taking these eLearning modules you will learn about and reflect on: Responsible supervision, mentoring and role-modeling.*'''General responsibilities:''' You will be introduced to the general responsibilities that can apply to anyone enrolled in research, regardless of the role.*'''Roles:''' You will be introduced to the different roles in a research environment and their corresponding responsibilities.*'''Virtue Ethics approach:''' Virtue ethics will be applied to supervision, mentoring and role-modeling with some interactive exercises*'''Role-modeling:''' You will be introduced to the concept of role-modeling, the responsibilities of a role model and how it can influence research practice and culture.n influence research practice and culture.)
Introduction of Virtue Ethics to Research Integrity + (By taking these interactive modules you wi … By taking these interactive modules you will learn about and reflect on: *'''Key characteristics of [https://embassy.science/wiki/Theme:520b3bc7-a6ab-4617-95f2-89c9dee31c53 virtue ethics]''': After watching an introductory video on virtue ethics, you can self-assess your knowledge of the most relevant characteristics of virtue ethics.*'''[[Theme:17d406f9-0b0f-4325-aa2d-2fe186d5ff34|Moral conflict and a moral dilemma:]]''' After an introduction to the concepts you will be asked to apply these concepts whilst analyzing two cases from the Rotterdam Dilemma Game, one of which portrays a moral conflict, the other a moral dilemma.*'''Your own aspirations to become a more virtuous researcher:''' After reflecting on your overarching goals as researchers, you will be asked to identify the three most important virtues that describe the kind of researcher you want to be (or become).*'''The influence of moral exemplar(s) on moral development and the cultivation of virtues:''' After reflecting on how virtues are learnt, and taught, and what a good role model/mentor entails, you will be asked to reflect on a particular situation, in which someone you looked up to inspired you to act more virtuously.up to inspired you to act more virtuously.)
CHANGER EU Project + (CHAllenges and innovative chaNGes in resea … CHAllenges and innovative chaNGes in research Ethics Reviews (CHANGER) is a three-year Coordination and Support Action (CSA) project, funded by the European Union’s Horizon WIDERA programme aiming to promote changes in research ethics reviews by strengthening the capacities of researchers to incorporate ethical judgements in the project design and implementation, and by supporting capacity building of Research Ethics Committees (RECs) to address new challenges posed by new technologies and new research practices.w technologies and new research practices.)
COMET Initiative + (COMET Initiative stands for "Core Outcome … COMET Initiative stands for "Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials". The initiative focuses on the development and application of 'core outcome sets' (COS), agreed standardised sets of outcomes. The COMET Initiative was launched in 2010 by MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology.MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology.)
Journal Impact Factor based on the date of electronic publication + (Calculation of journal’s Impact Factor (IF … Calculation of journal’s Impact Factor (IF) is based on the date of print publication even though articles are available online and can be cited. This creates problems in citation record leading to artificial increase of IFs. From now on Clarivate Analytics, which issues IFs through Journal Citation Reports (JCR), will calculate IFs based on the date of electronic publication.sed on the date of electronic publication.)
Accuracy of Credentials and Competence in Public Communications + (Carrie Mediln is a researcher who took a t … Carrie Mediln is a researcher who took a teaching position without completing her doctorate. She is routinely addressed by students as "Doctor" and is often introduced as "Doctor" Medlin during academic events and public speaking opportunities. She never clarifies that she did not receive a PhD degree. The case study asks whether Medlin has a responsibility to clarify her credentials.responsibility to clarify her credentials.)
An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample + (Case describing poorly planned research study.)
ENRIO Collection + (Case studies collection)