Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

Interactive Guide: Basic research Concepts + (This training aims to promote a better und … This training aims to promote a better understanding of basic research concepts and it's intended for researchers with little or no formal training in this area. The training program consists of five modules: Introduction, What is Research?;Research Design;Elements of Research;Methods of Information Collection;Handling Information.formation Collection;Handling Information.)
FAIR Research Data Management – What is FAIR RDM and why should we do it? + (This training introduces the concept of FA … This training introduces the concept of FAIR Research Data Management (RDM) and explains what the FAIR principles Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable mean in practice for researchers. It provides an overview of why research data management matters and how FAIR principles support good scientific practice throughout the research lifecycle. The training clarifies the relationship between FAIR data, open data, and managed data, highlighting common misunderstandings. Through practical examples, short exercises, and quizzes, participants learn how research data can be made more reusable for both humans and machines. The course is designed for researchers and research support staff who want a foundational understanding of FAIR RDM and how it contributes to transparency, collaboration, and long-term value of research outputs., and long-term value of research outputs.)
Training overview + (This training overview of the Austrian Age … This training overview of the Austrian Agency for Research Integrity (OeAWI) provides different educational activities, such as workshops, lectures and Train-the-Trainer program. These activities cover various topics of researh integrity and aim to promote good research practices. All formats can be found in German and English.ormats can be found in German and English.)
Teaching Controversial Issues + (This training programme aims to acknowledg … This training programme aims to acknowledge the importance of teaching controversial issues related mostly to recent past, religion, culture and identity in Northern Ireland. Intended mostly for principals, school leaders, managers and teachers, it consists of an overview, seven sessions and training guidance notes.even sessions and training guidance notes.)
Tutorial: PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals + (This tutorial provides information on the Public Health Service (PHS) Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. It is useful for committee members, institutional administrators, investigators, animal care personnel and veterinarians.)
How to Disclose Relationships, Activities, and Potential Conflicts of Interest + (This video addresses disclosure of financial and nonfinancial relationships and activities. It contains relevant guidance on how to handle them.)
Top 10 tips for robust & ethical research + (This video created by LARI offers 10 useful tips for research with emphasis on ethics in writing. It provides also some advices about research methods and collaboration with colleagues.)
Authorship: video + (This video is about determing authorship. It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of working alone or in a team. Advices are giving about working in a team.)
Integrity in Scientific Research Video Series + (This video series aims to help researchers, post docs, students, administrators and technicians to develop informed responses to ethical issues in research. The aim is to provoke discussion on ethical issues confronting different participants in research.)
Integrity in scientific research videos + (This video series will introduce key topics and ethical dilemmas in the responsible conduct of research. These videos are about research integrity-related issues amongst the most common within the research environment at all career level.)
How trustworthy? + (This visual art aims to increase awareness … This visual art aims to increase awareness on research integrity and serves as a learning tool. It consists of four parts. First part focuses on image manipulation and falsification. Second part deals with research data which includes human errors, poor choices and complete fabrication. Third part, that copes with text-based information, addresses plagiarism, fake journals and censorship. Fourth part concerns detection of grey zones between minor problems and negligence.nes between minor problems and negligence.)
Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice + (This web page lays down both general principles of good conduct and what constitutes misconduct, as well as rules specific to the institute, such as those concerning industry partnerships, thesis preparation and employment policy.)
Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans + (This web-based book provides information o … This web-based book provides information on Responsible conduct of research, particularly in the field of biomedicine. It uses a problem-based approach to cover a wide array of topics important to scientists conducting clinical and biomedical research. Some of the topics covered are: ethics and rules of research in humans, importance of appropriate study design, conflict of interest, genetics and stem cell research, etc.est, genetics and stem cell research, etc.)
Preprints. Instructions for Authors + (This webpage lists benefits of posting papers on preprint servers and offers some practical tips to authors. It contains Quick Submission Checklist, Background Requirements and pointers on how to prepare the article for a preprint server.)
The Reward Alliance + (This website contains documents, information and resources on how to increase the value of research and reduce waste. It is based on articles published in the medical journal The Lancet in 2014.)
FOSTER project workshop + (This workshop discusses how to deal with i … This workshop discusses how to deal with issues with regard to research integrity, addressing good and bad research practices. Some of the covered topics where: What is exactly research integrity? What are the risks? How to detect research misconduct? With what resources can researchers react to respond to topics related to research integrity? How should researchers act when research integrity is endangered? The planned learning outcome is to raise awareness on responsible conduct of research among PhD students and help them recognize and apply it in their research and in the research of others.ir research and in the research of others.)
Casuistry – is this RM, QRP or RCR? Three cases with dilemmas + (Three cases are presented. Are these cases … Three cases are presented. Are these cases Research Misconduct, Questionable Research Practices or Responsible Conduct of Research? Participants are asked for their normative judgement, after which a discussion takes place. At the end of the case, it is explained what was decided in the real case.The moderator asks the participants not only to make their normative judgement, but also to think about why. Which norms and values are at stake? On which norms and values did you base your judgement? Which values are in conflict and which are more important to you?flict and which are more important to you?)
Dispute Over Primary Authorship + (Three researchers put forth an equal amount of effort on a research project resulting in a dispute over who the primary author should be.)
Circularity in Research and Innovation + (Through interactive exercises, learners ex … Through interactive exercises, learners explore the 9R strategies—Refuse, Rethink, Reduce, Reuse, Repair, Refurbish, Remanufacture, Repurpose, Recycle—and understand how these practices contribute to sustainability across product lifecycles. Participants reflect on the environmental, social, and economic impacts of circularity, developing systems thinking and adaptability skills. By the end of the module, learners will be able to integrate circular principles into research, innovation, and design processes, promoting resource efficiency, responsible consumption, and sustainable development. consumption, and sustainable development.)
Science policy + (Through the determination of funding and g … Through the determination of funding and goals of the scientific community, science policy influences core aspects of all sciences. Science policy defines direction for research activities through investments both in people and equipment. Science policies are usually developed by governmental bodies and/or other stakeholders with any kind of interests in science (e.g., theoretical, practical, financial).'"`UNIQ--ref-00000000-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--references-00000001-QINU`"'NU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-00000001-QINU`"')
The Danish Act on the Research Advisory System + (Through this act, the Danish government e … Through this act, the Danish government establishes the Danish Council for Research and Innovation Policy and the Danish Council for Independent Research, whose main aim is to promote research, collaboration and ensure high standards in Denmark. Whereas the Danish Council for Research and Innovation Policy shall promote research of high societal relevance with practical impact, the Danish Council for Independent Research shall provide support and advice on research initiated by independent researchers.arch initiated by independent researchers.)
TiGRE + (TiGRE (“Trust in Governance and Regulation … TiGRE (“Trust in Governance and Regulation in Europe”) is a Horizon 2020 research project that explores how trust is built, maintained, or lost in European regulatory systems. It focuses on three key sectors finance, food safety, and data protection across different levels of governance. The project brings together a multidisciplinary team of academics and practitioners to study interactions among regulators, firms, interest groups, courts, and citizens. Using a mixed-methods approach (surveys, experiments, case studies, focus groups, media analysis), TiGRE aims to uncover the drivers of trust, develop indicators of declining trust, and propose scenarios and policy recommendations to help institutions strengthen trust in regulation.stitutions strengthen trust in regulation.)
Interim Practice Work + (To acquire the skills needed to ‘pass the … To acquire the skills needed to ‘pass the expertise’ and train others, and to understand the aim, content and didactics of each exercises, trainees need to practice them. Therefore, between the first and the second face-to-face session trainees need to facilitate the 5 exercises that they have learned about and experienced during the first part of the face-to-face program ([https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:64cb2917-6ee4-44ca-ad3b-b998bc6786ea Self-Declaration Approach],[https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:Ac206152-effd-475b-b8cd-7e5861cb65aa Debate and Dialogue],[https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:747f4d61-3c97-4c4b-acd9-4d69c95f134b Virtues and Norms],[https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:522ba3d0-9f26-41d5-9ecf-b4c88214887c The middle position], and [https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:A0dd2e82-52e7-4030-a396-54525630e75c Dilemma game]).2e7-4030-a396-54525630e75c Dilemma game]).)
The University of Oslo's Guidelines on Handling Conflicts + (To maintain a secure and open and to foste … To maintain a secure and open and to foster integrity, conflicts should be prevented as much as possible. This guideline describes what constitutes conflicts, how they can be prevented, the procedure for reporting conflicts and how they are handled. It applies only to conflicts among employees;conflicts between employees and students are handled separately.oyees and students are handled separately.)
Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains + (Traditionally forensic anthropologists are … Traditionally forensic anthropologists are occupied with skeletal remains but more and more they are dealing with a different range of preservation of human bodies and body parts that take part in medico-legal processes. In addition, forensic anthropologists are involved in the identification, missing person cases, and individualization of mass disaster victims '"`UNIQ--ref-00000000-QINU`"'. During their work, forensic anthropologists deal with different ethical issues that concern social, cultural, and political domains so ethical considerations can be applied to the profession and the individual '"`UNIQ--ref-00000001-QINU`"'.'"`UNIQ--references-00000002-QINU`"'U`"'. '"`UNIQ--references-00000002-QINU`"')

TEST 251209-GEA + (Trainer Test)

Transpose + (Transpose (TRANsparency in Scholarly Publi … Transpose (TRANsparency in Scholarly Publishing for Open Scholarship Evolution) is an initiative to build a database of journal policies, focussing on open peer review, co-reviewing and detailed preprinting policies. The goal of this initiative is to foster new practices while increasing awareness among authors, editors, and other stakeholders, while providing resources to assist journals in setting, sharing, and clarifying their policies.g, sharing, and clarifying their policies.)
Prospective registration of clinical trials + (Trial registration is the publication of i … Trial registration is the publication of information about the design, conduct, and administration of clinical trials and should be registered before enrollment of the first participant. The information should be published on a publicly-accessible website at no charge, managed by a nonprofit organization, freely available to anybody and searchable electronically. Registration aims 1) to improve the transparency of these trials and 2) to protect stakeholder interests – including the interests of the subjects, the investigators, peer scientists and society in general.s, peer scientists and society in general.)
Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? + (Two authors wrote to an editorial committe … Two authors wrote to an editorial committee to ask whether they could publish a paper anonymously. The authors work in a general practice, producing research that showed the health-related problems arising from the practice switching one of its contracts from one laboratory to another. The authors did not want to be perceived as assigning blame to any single party. The committee declined to publish the paper anonymously. This is a factual anonymized case.mously. This is a factual anonymized case.)
Fabrication and falsification + (Two graduate students co-author an article … Two graduate students co-author an article. After submission, they receive a response from a referee with critical but valid comments on one section. One of the graduate students takes the lead in the revision. The other student recognizes that in the new version, the other student has changed some data, writing to the referee that they were mistakes. The graduate student is suspicious because there is no good explanation for the change of data. In addition, she knows the revising student is desperate to publish in a good journal before she starts her job search next year. However there is no concrete evidence of misconduct.ere is no concrete evidence of misconduct.)
Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review + (Two papers in an environmental journal were retracted following investigations on claims that the peer-review process had been compromised.)
Reaction to bias + (Two post-docs, a man and a woman, are both … Two post-docs, a man and a woman, are both working on new major proposals under the supervision of their professor. Only one of the proposals can be submitted. After much discussion, the professor selects the proposal of the female post-doc and invites the male post-doc to be co-PI with him. Being co-PI is major career opportunity. The question arises, why did the professor select the proposal of one post-doc (the female) and invite the other (the male) to be his co-PI?vite the other (the male) to be his co-PI?)
Long distance collaboration + (Two research groups are collaborating remo … Two research groups are collaborating remotely. One will provide the experimental results, the other will provide simulations. One of the scientists from the simulating group discovers the other group has overlooked some fundamental physics. She decides this needs to be published immediately, and overnight writes a paper to demonstrate this, including experiments from their collaborators. The scientist who writes the article makes himself the first author. He sends the draft to the collaborating group, who immediately respond angrily. They reject the idea that someone else could be first author with their experiments and they threaten to cancel the collaboration, retracting all funding.the collaboration, retracting all funding.)
UKRI Open Access Policy and Guide + (UK Research and Innovation’s open access p … UK Research and Innovation’s open access policy covers peer‑reviewed research articles and long‑form outputs (monographs, book chapters and edited collections) acknowledging UKRI funding. The policy mandates immediate open access for articles under permitted licences (typically CC BY) via compliant journals or repositories, and sets staged requirements and funding routes for long‑form publications. Supplementary guidance and FAQs clarify third‑party copyright, exceptions, and routes for compliance, while engagement materials explain implementation timelines and support for research organisations. The policy’s goal is to ensure that publicly funded research can be freely accessed, used and built upon, with clear signposting to acknowledge funding and manage rights. to acknowledge funding and manage rights.)
Unfair reviewing + (Unfair reviewing refers to a reviewer abus … Unfair reviewing refers to a reviewer abusing their position to promote their own interests or unreasonably disadvantage others. Unfair reviewing can occur during the process of peer review of journal manuscripts, grant applications or for colleagues applying for a promotion.r for colleagues applying for a promotion.)
A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct + (Upon acceptance of a manuscript prepared by a researcher, the editor-in-chief of the journal asked the researcher to add an article published in their journal to the reference list. The researcher agreed to the request.)
Responsible use of AI in peer review + (Use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools … Use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools (such as large language models and chatbots) in peer review is an inevitable occurrence, as well as the ethical considerations surrounding it. The question is how reviewers and editors might responsibly integrate AI (for example, for grammar checks or literature searches) while ensuring that human experts remain responsible for evaluation and that confidentiality is maintained.on and that confidentiality is maintained.)
A Plagiarism Adventure (Et Plagieringseventyr) + (Using the theme of Charles Dickens' "Christmas Carol," this amusing Norwegian video with English subtitles presents consequences of plagiarism.)
Sertifika + (VIRT2UE eğitmen eğitimi programına kaydola … VIRT2UE eğitmen eğitimi programına kaydolan katılımcıların, sertifikalı eğitmen olma şansı vardır. Bu sertifika, sertifika sahibi kişinin bir araştırma doğruluğu eğitmeni olarak gerekli didaktik becerilere sahip olduğunu gösterir. Katılımcılar online ve yüz yüze dersleri tamamladıklarında ve 10 başka araştırmacıyı eğittiklerinde sertifikayı almaya hak kazanırlar.Katılımcıların tercihen tüm eğitim oturumlarına katılmış, toplantılar arasındaki dönemde beş alıştırmayı uygulamış ve 10 başka araştırmacıyı bu beş alıştırmanın en az üçü üzerinden eğitmiş olmaları gerekmektedir. Ancak bu yükümlülükler gerektiği durumlarda değiştirilebilir (örneğin küçük araştırma topluluklarında eğitim almaya istekli 10 araştırmacı bulmak zor olabilir). Eğitim alan kişinin sertifika almaya hak kazanmak için yeteri kadar dersi tamamlayıp tamamlamadığına eğitmen karar verecektir. Becerilerine güveniyor olmaları durumunda eğitimi alan katılımcılar iki yüz yüze oturum arasında yalnızca alıştırmaları uygulamak yerine 10 araştırmacıyı eğitmeyi de tercih edebilirler.ştırmacıyı eğitmeyi de tercih edebilirler.)
VIRT2UE + (VIRT2UE: A European Train-the-Trainer Programme for Teaching Research Integrity)
Validated model of key OS Impact pathways and recommendations + (Validated Model of Key Open Science Impact … Validated Model of Key Open Science Impact Pathways and Guidelines/Recommendations is a project deliverable from the European Commission-funded ''PathOS'' initiative. The document presents a validated model explaining how Open Science practices like Open Access publishing, FAIR data, and citizen science create impacts in academic, societal, and economic realms. Over three years, the project asked: What impacts does Open Science have? How do they occur? And what factors help or hinder these impacts? The report finds that Open Science accelerates knowledge sharing, encourages collaboration, and increases research visibility, but benefits are unevenly distributed. Societal impacts include empowering communities and improving outcomes in health and the environment. Economic gains such as reduced research costs and innovation potential are identified but often lack strong direct evidence. The deliverable also highlights challenges: access alone isn’t enough, equity must be ensured, and robust methods are needed to measure impact. Practical recommendations are offered for policymakers and institutions.offered for policymakers and institutions.)
Values and norms + (Values are important beliefs or ideals of … Values are important beliefs or ideals of a person in a community, serving as a motivation for action. Norms are action-guiding rules. The difference between a value and a norm is that a value is general, referring to an overall ideal, whereas a norm is concrete, specifying certain things that have to be done (or omitted). Values can be operationalized in specifying norms;norms refer to and are justified by underlying values.to and are justified by underlying values.)
First Insubria International School in Methodology, Ethics and Integrity in Biomedical Science + (Video on research integrity and ethics.)
WHO Policy on Open Access + (WHO’s open access policy requires WHO‑auth … WHO’s open access policy requires WHO‑authored and WHO‑funded journal articles to be published open access from 1 January 2021, preferably in journals indexed in DOAJ and with agreements to deposit the version of record in PubMed Central and Europe PMC. WHO does not support APCs for hybrid journals except in transitional cases;accepted manuscripts must be deposited with no embargo and licensed under CC BY 3.0 IGO (WHO‑authored) or CC BY 4.0 (WHO‑funded). WHO publications since November 2016 are released under CC BY‑NC‑SA 3.0 IGO, and the policy includes explicit expectations for data availability statements and deposition of datasets with persistent identifiers. The page links to WHO journals indexed in DOAJ and to IRIS, WHO’s publication repository.and to IRIS, WHO’s publication repository.)
Debate vs Dialogue + (Watch this interactive video, which explains the difference between debate and dialogue!)
Introduction to the evaluation of the effectiveness of Research Ethics and Integrity (REI) training + (We may start with a simple question: why m … We may start with a simple question: why measure research ethics and integrity (REI) training effectiveness? To teachers this may sound like a strange question as this is one of the main things teachers need to do – making a conclusion if the learners are learning, improving, developing. Watts et al. (2017) also highlight that occasionally various authorities require evidence of people improving their knowledge and skills as a result of a training.Measuring the effectiveness of training is like conducting research – there should be a guiding question (e.g. What do participants learn, and how is that related to what they are meant to learn through the training? How do learning activities encourage engagement and learning?), then there should be a tool to collect information and a means to analyse the information. Finally, results should be interpreted, and one can make a conclusion about whether the training achieves its aims.The BEYOND Measurement toolbox introduced in this module gives an overview of large-scale as well as small-scale feasible measurement instruments on short, medium and long-term training effects adapted to the needs of a variety of target groups and different fields/domains. We understand the measurement of training effect through the learning achieved and displayed as a result of participation in training. This means that the learning is always relative to the goals of the training. The examples of how to understand the learning taking place in REI training may be good for certain types of training and contexts, whereas in others they may not be feasible. Because training, its learning objectives and the pedagogical approaches vary, we have aimed to present a broad array of measurements and other means of evaluating the learning that takes place.Tools include a variety of examples ranging from self-evaluation instruments to pre-post-texts, to physiological markers to the use of authentic learning activities, from individual measurement to group learning, from micro to macro level. We have not restricted this exploration and analysis to include strictly means of measurement in a quantitative sense of the word but have also included qualitative indicators of the worth or success of training.ators of the worth or success of training.)
The Environmental Cost of Software and Online Services + (We rarely think about the environmental co … We rarely think about the environmental cost of streaming a movie, joining a video call, or downloading a podcast— but the digital world runs on data centers that use huge amounts of energy, water, and land. This article by the Mozilla Foundation, linked in the first slide of this course (www.mozillafoundation.org/en/blog/ai-internet-carbon-footprint/), breaks down the “invisible” footprint of digital activity.Skip the section on AI — we’ll cover that in a separate training module. Read the rest of the article and then come back to complete the interactive exercises.ack to complete the interactive exercises.)
Author accused of stealing research and publishing under their name + (We received a letter from a third party, a … We received a letter from a third party, accusing author A of putting his/her name against an article, published in our journal, when the research itself belongs to author A's student.Our journal is a fully English language publication and the accusing third party and author A are from a non-English speaking country, as is the student (assumedly). The accusing third party forwarded the student's research paper to the editor which is entirely written in another language but contained an English abstract.The Editor contacted author A and the response received included an attached confirmation letter supposedly from his/her student stating that they had no involvement in the published work by author A and that their research is completely separate to the published paper by author A.We have several concerns:1. It is difficult for the editor to examine the abstract the third party sent to us against the published article by author A.2. We do not know if the response letter emailed from author A, confirming no involvement in author A's paper, is genuinely from the student.3. The accuser's identity or relation to the matter is unknown to us. Ideally the editor needs to contact the student directly but we need bona fide contact details of the student and we are not sure we would get it from the accuser or the accused author A. Google is also of little help as there are so many people with the name.as there are so many people with the name.)
Wellcome – Open Access Policy and Guidance (2025) + (Wellcome’s policy applies to original rese … Wellcome’s policy applies to original research publications arising in whole or in part from its funding. It requires immediate open access, typically under CC BY, and provides detailed guidance on compliance routes, acknowledgement of funding, and when a No‑Derivatives (ND) licence exception may be requested. From 1 January 2025, Wellcome will only fund APCs for articles in fully open access journals or platforms indexed in DOAJ;repository‑based routes and rights retention remain available. Additional guidance covers open access funding for books and chapters, support for centres and programmes, and how to manage rights and third‑party content. to manage rights and third‑party content.)
Research misconduct + (What is research misconduct? Which practic … What is research misconduct? Which practices are considered ‘misconduct’ and which might be labelled a less serious ‘misbehavior’ or ‘questionable research practice’? For some, misconduct is synonymous with ‘FFP’ - Falsification, Fabrication and Plagiarism '"`UNIQ--ref-00000000-QINU`"'– whereas others consider a failure to meet ethical, legal and professional obligations, and even a failure to properly deal with misconduct allegations, to qualify as misconduct. '"`UNIQ--ref-00000001-QINU`"'.There is ongoing debate among academics how to precisely define research misconduct. '"`UNIQ--ref-00000002-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--ref-00000003-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--ref-00000004-QINU`"'The European Code of Conduct on Research Integrity '"`UNIQ--ref-00000005-QINU`"' refers to misconduct as FFP. Other violations which damage the integrity of the research are referred to as ‘other unacceptable practices’.'"`UNIQ--references-00000006-QINU`"'ices’.'"`UNIQ--references-00000006-QINU`"')
The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (What should be included within research re … What should be included within research reports? Reporting guidelines are consensus-based recommendations for minimum standards of reporting. They are structured and simple tools for researchers to be used during the writing process. The EQUATOR Network defines a reporting guideline as“[a] checklist, flow diagram, or structured text to guide authors in reporting a specific type of research, developed using explicit methodology.” '"`UNIQ--ref-00000000-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--references-00000001-QINU`"'NU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-00000001-QINU`"')