Orphaned pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
The following pages are not linked from or transcluded into other pages in The Embassy of Good Science.
50 s ordered by recently added
- Discovery of Error in One's Own Work
- Policy Statement on Open Access for Publications from Publicly Funded Research Projects Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (2014), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
- Facebook Manipulated 689,003 Users' Emotions For Science
- Resident physician plagiarises publications supported by 10 National Institutes of Health grants
- Teaching Ethics in Research: A Multidisciplinary Model
- Guidelines for Integrity in Scientific Research
- UKRIO's Authorship Integrity Toolkit
- Five-step authorship framework to improve transparency in disclosing contributors to industry-sponsored clinical trial publications
- APEC Guiding Principles for Research Integrity (2022)
- An innovation in teaching ethics to medical students
- Danish National Strategy for Open Access
- Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules
- Taiwan Junior Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (?), Chien Chou
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations
- Open Science - A practical guide for early-career researchers (2023), Brinkman, L., Dijk, E., de Jonge, H., Loorbach, N., & Rutten, D.
- Good Scientific Research Practice (2004), Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies (63 RI Good scientific research practice - Poland, p. 1)
- Guest Post — Unethical Practices in Research and Publishing: Evidence from Russia
- Code of Ethics of Estonian Scientists
- To Medicate or Not to Medicate
- Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement
- Five vignettes in speech and language research
- Innovation under pressure: Implications for data privacy during the Covid-19 pandemic
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Data Fabrication
- Access to Scientific Information (by the Inter-Academy Panel) (2013), InterAcademy Panel
- National Guidelines for Promoting Open Science (2024), National Library of Sweden (Kungliga biblioteket, KB)
- Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set).
- The REAPPRAISED checklist to identify flawed papers
- Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts
- Chinese Code of Conduct for Responsible Research, 2023
- Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2020), the Royal Irish Academy
- Humanities in the European Research Area (HERA)
- Ethics Requirement Score: new tool for evaluating ethics in publications
- Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003)
- One in six of the papers you cite in a review has been retracted. What do you do?
- Evaluating teaching and students' learning of academic research ethic
- Reporting censurable conditions for employees at University of Oslo (whistleblowing)
- Science Council of Japan on Code of Conduct for Scientists–Revised Version (2013)
- Studying Vulnerable Individuals
- Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study
- Publishing complications and patient safety
- Research or Services?
- cOAlition S Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications
- Manchester University's Data Management Planning Guidance
- Romanian Codul General de Etică în Cercetarea Științifică - General code of ethics in scientific research 2015
- Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing
- Resolution on the Research and Innovation Strategy of Slovenia
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues
- Tongan children’s involvement in research
- Data Sharing and Potential Future Uses
