Long pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 s ordered by recently added
- (hist) Informed Consent with Pre-Testing Convenience Samples [846 bytes]
- (hist) German Council of Science and Humanities' Recommendations for Evaluating and Controlling Research Performance [845 bytes]
- (hist) Research ethics training of trainers: Developing capacity of Bolivian health science and civil society leaders [845 bytes]
- (hist) Central statistical monitoring: detecting fraud in clinical trials [844 bytes]
- (hist) TiGRE [844 bytes]
- (hist) Engaging with Citizen Scientists: Integrating Environmental and Climate Considerations into Research Practice [844 bytes]
- (hist) Who will mentor the mentors? [843 bytes]
- (hist) Reporting Adverse Effects [840 bytes]
- (hist) Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough [840 bytes]
- (hist) Meta-assessment of bias in science [840 bytes]
- (hist) What to communicate in retraction notices? [839 bytes]
- (hist) Team-based learning instruction for responsible conduct of research positively impacts ethical decision-making [838 bytes]
- (hist) A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals. [838 bytes]
- (hist) Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study [837 bytes]
- (hist) Fraudulent algorithm: A pain too deep for adequate analgesia [836 bytes]
- (hist) False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial [836 bytes]
- (hist) Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules [835 bytes]
- (hist) The Three Rs of Animal Research [834 bytes]
- (hist) Changing a grant proposal to meet the reviewers requests [834 bytes]
- (hist) Action [832 bytes]
- (hist) The European Union Good Clinical Practice Directive [832 bytes]
- (hist) Credit for work [832 bytes]
- (hist) AIOLIA [831 bytes]
- (hist) Honest refereeing [830 bytes]
- (hist) The publication of controversial views [830 bytes]
- (hist) WorldFAIR [829 bytes]
- (hist) TEST 251209-GEA [829 bytes]
- (hist) Author misconduct: Not just the editors' responsibility [828 bytes]
- (hist) Intellectual Rights Involving Multiple Institutions [827 bytes]
- (hist) The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern Science [827 bytes]
- (hist) The Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Amendments to the Ethics Code of Ethics Committee in Science and Higher Education [825 bytes]
- (hist) Contributers [825 bytes]
- (hist) A bullshit excuse? My lab notebook “was blown into a manure pit” [823 bytes]
- (hist) A proposal for a model of informed consent for the collection, storage and use of biological materials for research purposes [823 bytes]
- (hist) Mentoring for Responsible Research: The Creation of a Curriculum for Faculty to Teach RCR in the Research Environment [823 bytes]
- (hist) XR4Human [822 bytes]
- (hist) Procedures of the Science Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences [822 bytes]
- (hist) Teenage Youth and Coercion [821 bytes]
- (hist) Guidelines for Responsible Data Management in Scientific Research [821 bytes]
- (hist) Macchiarini may be dismissed from Karolinska;dean of research resigns [820 bytes]
- (hist) Authorship in scholarly manuscripts: practical considerations for resident and early career physicians [820 bytes]
- (hist) Integrating Environmental & Climate Considerations in Ethics Review [817 bytes]
- (hist) Latvian Academy of Sciences' Code of Ethics for Scientists [817 bytes]
- (hist) Greening Tech — What and How [816 bytes]
- (hist) The French Vade Mecum on Scientific Integrity [814 bytes]
- (hist) The Case of the Missing Artefact [814 bytes]
- (hist) TRREE on-line training programme on the ethics and regulation of health research involving human participants [814 bytes]
- (hist) Misconduct and Fraud in clinical research [812 bytes]
- (hist) For Whom Is It Important [812 bytes]
- (hist) You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues [810 bytes]
