Oldest pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Researchers Call For the Release of Findings of a Misconduct Investigation (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Faculty development: if you build it, they will come (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Guidelines 03/2020 on the processing of data concerning health for the purpose of scientific research in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Central statistical monitoring: detecting fraud in clinical trials (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Ethics in educational research: Introducing a methodological tool for effective ethical analysis (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Peer-mentored research development meeting: a model for successful peer mentoring among junior level researchers (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Teaching the Ethical Principles of Psychology (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- ALLEA Permanent Working Group Science and Ethics (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Intellectual Rights Involving Multiple Institutions (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Development of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research (09:33, 2 March 2026)
- Cross-boundary collaborations (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Incidental research findings (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Peer review card game (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Conducting research in high risk locations (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains (09:45, 2 March 2026)
- Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Collaborative working (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Research ethics committees (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Epistemic virtues (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Digital humanities (09:46, 2 March 2026)
- Internet Research Ethics (09:47, 2 March 2026)
- Research integrity officers in Europe (09:47, 2 March 2026)
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials (09:47, 2 March 2026)
- The ethical dilemmas of genome editing (09:47, 2 March 2026)
- Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science (09:47, 2 March 2026)
- Informed assent (09:47, 2 March 2026)
- Project:User (11:33, 3 March 2026)
- TEST 251209-GEA (13:33, 3 March 2026)
- Add Resources to the Embassy! (13:35, 3 March 2026)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Building and leading an effective team (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- Manchester University's Data Protection Policy (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- Dual submissions (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- University of Oslo's Policy on Fraudulent Documents (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- Manchester University's Code of Good Research Conduct (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- Netherlands Position Paper on the Recognition and Rewards of Academics (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- Manchester University's Intellectual Property Policy (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- Manchester University's Data Management Planning Guidance (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- The Manchester University's Code of Practice for Investigating Concerns about the Conduct of Research (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- Infographic - SOPs4RI Guidelines on Responsible Supervision and Leadership (13:36, 3 March 2026)
- The University of Oslo's Guidelines on Handling Conflicts (13:37, 3 March 2026)
- Research culture (13:37, 3 March 2026)
- Valuing Voices Tool (13:40, 3 March 2026)
- Credit for work (13:42, 3 March 2026)
- Policy documents of the German Rectors’ Conference (HRK) (13:42, 3 March 2026)
- Intellectual property and power imbalance (13:42, 3 March 2026)
