User contributions
From The Embassy of Good Science
- 21:17, 22 October 2020 diff hist +39 Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations
- 21:16, 22 October 2020 diff hist -34 Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations
- 21:12, 22 October 2020 diff hist -19 Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's
- 21:04, 22 October 2020 diff hist -464 Jesse's Intent
- 21:03, 22 October 2020 diff hist +4 The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research
- 20:56, 22 October 2020 diff hist 0 The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science
- 20:56, 22 October 2020 diff hist -1,323 The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science
- 20:54, 22 October 2020 diff hist +187 Cultural differences and communication in the lab current
- 20:48, 22 October 2020 diff hist -18 Irish National Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity current
- 20:43, 22 October 2020 diff hist -1,036 History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala
- 20:39, 22 October 2020 diff hist +5 The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics?
- 20:39, 22 October 2020 diff hist -1,128 The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics?
- 20:36, 22 October 2020 diff hist +82 Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds
- 20:31, 22 October 2020 diff hist -10 Psychology Grad Student Faked Data
- 20:28, 22 October 2020 diff hist -75 Psychology Grad Student Faked Data
- 20:26, 22 October 2020 diff hist +35 Changing a grant proposal to meet the reviewers requests current
- 15:26, 22 October 2020 diff hist -4 The TRUST Code - a Global Code of Conduct for Equitable Research Partnerships
- 10:30, 22 October 2020 diff hist +264 Intellectual conflicts of interest
- 10:30, 22 October 2020 diff hist -263 Intellectual conflicts of interest
- 17:12, 20 October 2020 diff hist +4,433 N Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Good Practices |Title=What are the causes of the variability in research integrity levels? A National Survey on Research Integrity |Is About=The online [ht..."
- 16:59, 20 October 2020 diff hist 0 Journal Impact Factor
- 16:59, 20 October 2020 diff hist +175 Journal Impact Factor
- 16:54, 20 October 2020 diff hist -5 Research culture current
- 16:50, 20 October 2020 diff hist +1,031 Informed assent current
- 16:48, 20 October 2020 diff hist +43 Inappropriate study design
- 16:45, 20 October 2020 diff hist +334 Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)
- 16:41, 20 October 2020 diff hist -17 H-index current
- 16:39, 20 October 2020 diff hist -4 Hostile peer review
- 16:38, 20 October 2020 diff hist +8 H-index
- 16:35, 20 October 2020 diff hist -152 High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations
- 16:14, 20 October 2020 diff hist -30 Epistemic virtues
- 16:12, 20 October 2020 diff hist +269 Research integrity training for diverse disciplines
- 16:07, 20 October 2020 diff hist -1 Conflict of interests current
- 16:06, 20 October 2020 diff hist -4 Conflict of interest in peer review
- 16:06, 20 October 2020 diff hist +195 Confidentiality
- 16:04, 20 October 2020 diff hist -3 Balancing harms and benefits
- 16:03, 20 October 2020 diff hist +46 Balancing harms and benefits
- 16:01, 20 October 2020 diff hist +141 Altmetrics
- 15:11, 20 October 2020 diff hist +4,589 N Keeping inadequate notes of the research process Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Title=Keeping inadequate notes of the research process |Is About=Adequate documentation or ‘note taking’ of the research pro..."
- 15:02, 20 October 2020 diff hist +2,673 N (re)submitting without consent of all authors Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Has Parent Theme=Theme:883697c8-d319-4224-991e-ce063d648efd |Title=(re)submitting without consent of all authors |Is About=Paper..."
- 14:59, 20 October 2020 diff hist +17 Fake peer-reviewing
- 14:58, 20 October 2020 diff hist +5,465 N Fake peer-reviewing Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Has Parent Theme=Theme:883697c8-d319-4224-991e-ce063d648efd |Title=Fake peer-reviewing |Is About=Fake reviewing, or self-reviewi..."
- 14:39, 20 October 2020 diff hist -3 Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions
- 14:38, 20 October 2020 diff hist +3,564 N Unfair reviewing Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Has Parent Theme=Theme:883697c8-d319-4224-991e-ce063d648efd |Title=Unfair reviewing |Is About=Unfair reviewing refers to a revie..."
- 14:35, 20 October 2020 diff hist +4,136 N Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Has Parent Theme=Theme:883697c8-d319-4224-991e-ce063d648efd |Title=Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials |Is About..."
- 14:31, 20 October 2020 diff hist +2,997 N Non-disclosure of changes to the research design Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Has Parent Theme=Theme:883697c8-d319-4224-991e-ce063d648efd |Title=Non-disclosure of changes to the research design |Is About=No..."
- 14:26, 20 October 2020 diff hist -129 Posing irrelevant research questions
- 14:22, 20 October 2020 diff hist +22 Intellectual conflicts of interest
- 14:21, 20 October 2020 diff hist +1,755 Intellectual conflicts of interest
- 14:16, 20 October 2020 diff hist +5,192 N Intellectual conflicts of interest Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Has Parent Theme=Theme:6d71bd59-c3bc-4cd5-9c9f-1ab4e53fc320 |Title=Intellectual conflicts of interest |Is About=The term ‘inte..."
