Orphaned pages

From The Embassy of Good Science

The following pages are not linked from or transcluded into other pages in The Embassy of Good Science.

50 s ordered by recently added

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Grading the quality of evidence in clinical practice guidelines
  2. The decision on ice
  3. Faking it in academia- the rise of authorship fraud
  4. The Rise of Octopus Affiliation: Navigating Multiple Institutional Associations in Academic Publishing
  5. The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability
  6. Consent and Assent for Research on Children
  7. Sponsorship of drug and device studies by the manufacturing company
  8. Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration
  9. Being grossly unfair to your collaborators
  10. Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports
  11. Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection
  12. Consent for publication (Participant)
  13. Falsifiability and Attractor States in Scientific Theories: A Framework for Evaluating Evidence
  14. Institutional codes of conduct for research integrity
  15. Anonymisation and pseudonymisation
  16. Secondary corrections
  17. Questionable Research Practices in Study Design
  18. Internet Research Ethics
  19. Responsible Use of AI in Research: Balancing Innovation and Integrity
  20. Methods to increase data availability
  21. Empathy in History Research and Education
  22. Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing)
  23. Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC)
  24. High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS)
  25. Replicability in the Humanities
  26. Gene Editing: Ethical Frontiers and Scientific Integrity
  27. The ethical dilemmas of genome editing
  28. Research collaboration
  29. Ethics in global digital psychiatry: balancing innovation and responsibility
  30. The Ghost Collaborator
  31. ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job
  32. Who Owns the Field Notes
  33. Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough
  34. Data anonymity
  35. Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
  36. Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did
  37. New claim to authorship of published paper
  38. Retraction notice - fake email peer-review
  39. A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct
  40. Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice
  41. Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd
  42. Inconsistent Findings Between Trainee and Researcher
  43. Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct
  44. UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
  45. Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education.
  46. The Wild West of Animal Experimentation
  47. Criminologist to have four papers retracted following months of scrutiny
  48. DOAB
  49. Cases. Research Ethics Training Virtual Course
  50. Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.2.0