Text (Instruction Step Text)
From The Embassy of Good Science
Describe the actions the user should take to experience the material (including preparation and follow up if any). Write in an active way.
- ⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Text
4
The below video describes the difference between a debate and a dialogue. Click on the annotations to learn more throughout the video. +
Watch the interactive video below and complete the exercises! +
Watch the interactive video below and complete the exercises! +
Watch the interactive video below and complete the exercises! +
Read the slides below and complete the interactive exercises! +
Watch the interactive video below and complete the exercises! +
Read the slides and complete the exercises below! +
[https://eneri.eu/eneri-classroom/ ENERI Classroom] contains training material exploring research ethics and integrity issues focusing on academics, and research ethics and integrity experts. The research integrity advisory boards, committees handling allegations or working with research integrity policy development, research integrity officers and advisors, research integrity ombudspersons (RIOs), research ethics committees including their members and their secretariats (RECs), and experts and officers in EU-bodies are the main target groups of the training materials and curricula tool. +
'''''Target audience:''' Senior researchers and RERI experts''
The case studies developed by ENERI address themes that [https://classroom.eneri.eu/research-integrity research integrity] and [https://classroom.eneri.eu/research-ethics research ethics] experts deal with as well as [https://classroom.eneri.eu/overlapping-issues comprehensive and overlapping issues] involving both integrity and ethics related considerations. These include: good scientific practice, questionable research practices, research misconduct, responsible authorship, peer review, and whistleblowing, ethics review, the protection of human rights, the safety of clinical trials, informed consent procedures, research with participants unable to consent, and the protection of animals, data management and data protection, open data sharing, open access, transparency, fairness, reliability and credibility, and conflicts of interest. While RECs and RIOs are key actors in facilitating research ethics and integrity, there may be countries that lack infrastructure as well as training opportunities for actors in related key positions. A specific section focusing on the [https://classroom.eneri.eu/node/63 development of proper infrastructure] is also present. +
[https://eneri.eu/eneri-classroom/ ENERI Classroom] contains training material exploring research ethics and integrity issues focusing on academics, and research ethics and integrity experts. The research integrity advisory boards, committees handling allegations or working with research integrity policy development, research integrity officers and advisors, research integrity ombudspersons (RIOs), research ethics committees including their members and their secretariats (RECs), and experts and officers in EU-bodies are the main target groups of the training materials and curricula tool. +
'''''Target audience:''' Bachelor and master students, doctoral students and early career researchers.''
The [https://www.academicintegrity.eu/wp/bridge/ BRIDGE project] provides [https://www.academicintegrity.eu/wp/bridge-modules-2/ training modules] and [https://www.academicintegrity.eu/wp/vignettes_interactive/ vignettes] that can be inserted into research ethics and integrity courses. +
'''''Target audience:''' doctoral students and early career researches, senior researchers and RERI experts''
The [https://www.academicintegrity.eu/wp/bridge/ BRIDGE project] developed a specific [https://www.academicintegrity.eu/wp/bridge-module-for-supervisors/ module for supervisors]. +
'''''Target audience:''' doctoral students and early career researches, senior researchers and RERI experts''
The [https://www.academicintegrity.eu/wp/bridge/ BRIDGE project] developed a specific [https://www.academicintegrity.eu/wp/bridge-module-for-supervisors/ module for supervisors]. +
The aim of this activity is to invite participants to reflect on their expectations. This is useful both for trainers and participants.
<span lang="EN-US">Trainers can pick between two possible activities:</span>
'''<span lang="EN-US">A) OPTION 1: Mind map activity</span>''' <span lang="EN-US">→ small group activity: in sub-groups participants create a mind map of their current knowledge on the topic.The following steps can support trainers in organizing this activity:</span>
<span lang="EN-US">o Divide participants into subgroups.</span>
<span lang="EN-US">o Provide each group with a digital (or physical) board.</span>
o Ask them to brainstorm and write down the words that come to mind when they think of [the topic of the session].
<span lang="EN-US">o Ask them to divide the terms into:</span>
<span lang="EN-US">- Topics they want to learn more about.</span>
<span lang="EN-US">- Topics they are already familiar with.</span>
'''<span lang="EN-US">B) </span>OPTION 2: Learning goals with Mentimeter'''
<span lang="EN-US">o Prepare and share a Mentimeter (or similar tool) with the following question: ''after this session I expect to be able to…''</span>
o Ask participants to submit two goals, project the results and discuss them with the group.<div><div><div><span name="_msocom_1"></span></div></div></div> +
During this second mini lecture you can discuss the core ethical issues related to biobanking and applying the concepts to practical cases. To build your presentation you can use the content of the irecs modules, which will provide you with videos and examples. You can integrate those in a few PowerPoint slides:
<div>
*Slide 1: Show a case on biobanking. For example: [https://classroom.eneri.eu/node/328 <u>The Ebola Outbreak in Sierra Leone</u>]. Before watching the video, encourage trainees to pay attention to ethical concerns.
*Slide 2: Stimulate trainees to share ethical concerns regarding biobanking. You can use one of these guiding questions: ''What ethical concerns did you hear in the video? What did you hear about the informed consent process? What are the consequences of an incomplete consent in relation to biobanking? What did you hear about exploitation? What effect might exploitation have on the local population?''
Collect the ethical issues that arise from the trainees on a (digital) whiteboard. Share suggestions and explanations of the ethical issues by using information from the irecs modules. For example: think of [https://classroom.eneri.eu/node/331 <u>Consent Issues for Children</u>], [https://classroom.eneri.eu/node/332 <u>Personal Data Processing Issues</u>] or [https://classroom.eneri.eu/node/334 <u>Dealing With Incidental Findings</u>]
<u>Trainer tip:</u> connect information you share during the mini lectures with the elements you have seen on the mind maps of the trainees to keep them involved.
</div> +
Once you have completed the above steps, click the "Save Page" button. Your initiative page is now complete, and you should be able to see it listed in the [[Special:BrowseData/Initiative|Initiative section]]! +
<span lang="EN-US">TIER2 brings a unique combination of skills and perspectives, consisting of eleven partners from seven countries, well spread across Europe. The partner organisations all bring a wealth of expertise and experience regarding the target communities (computer science, life science, social science), research culture reform, technical aspects of infrastructure and services, as well as expertise in social sciences and humanities, and gender aspects of R&I. </span>
==[https://irise-project.eu/ iRise]==
[[File:IRISE .png|thumb]]
iRise aims to deepen understanding of reproducibility drivers, evaluate their effectiveness and provide concrete solutions to enhance scientific evidence.
Their direct objectives are:
- Develop working definitions and a general framework for diagnosing and addressing reproducibility problems, define costs, benefits and opportunities, and assess the utility of theoretical evidence in forecasting the success of interventions.
- Perform scoping and systematic reviews to identify and evaluate existing interventions to improve reproducibility.
- Explore the interface between reproducibility and research culture, and in particular considerations and mainstreaming of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI).
- Consult and engage key stakeholder groups in prioritising practices and practical tool development for adoption to increase reproducibility.
- Test efficacy and feasibility of specific interventions to increase reproducibility.
==[https://osiris4r.eu/ OSIRIS]==
[[File:OSIRIS .png|thumb]]
Open Science to Increase Reproducibility in Science (OSIRIS) aims to facilitate the shift by systematically gathering knowledge on the underlying drivers, testing effective evidence-based solutions, identifying incentives for reproducibility by stakeholders, and embedding reproducibility in research design. +
In this step, you can learn to edit any theme page on the Embassy. Click the video to learn how.
<div class="video-button" data-href="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-DX1TfHjXc4">
<span class="video-button-label">Editing Theme Pages</span>
<span class="video-button-duration">1:01 min</span>
</div> +
[[File:A pair of eyes.png|center|frameless|600x600px]]
For most people, the ultimate proof that something is true is to see it for themselves. But how reliable are your observations? In the following pages, we will consider three potential influencing factors:
*The sense perception of the observer
*The impacts of the observer
*The viewpoint of the observer +
The second type of resource that you can add to the Embassy are cases. Cases of the relevant kind are real or hypothetical scenarios that illustrate an issue related to research integrity and ethics. Your case should provide a detailed account of the situation, and and highlight the central issues and any ethical dilemmas faced, as well as possible resolutions.
Cases are meant to facilitate reflection on what it is to be a good researcher in practice, to think about what went right or wrong, and to explore alternatives, so that we as researchers can learn from our own and each other's mistakes. After all, how can we become better researchers if we never think about what went wrong?
To add a case, you need:
*A Title
*Some text in the "What is this about?" box
*Some selections in the "For whom is this important?" box
*A URL to the case in the "Link" box
For some inspiration, check out other [https://embassy.science/wiki/Special:BrowseData/Resource?_search_Resource_Type%5B0%5D=Cases cases]. +
