Approved revisions

From The Embassy of Good Science

50 ss ordered by recently added

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Non-reporting of negative findings
  2. Dilemmas in daily practice
  3. Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)
  4. Unfair reviewing
  5. Development and Value of National Research Integrity Codes
  6. Consent for publication (Author)
  7. Research misconduct
  8. Peer review
  9. SCImago Journal Rankings
  10. Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective
  11. Ethical issues in qualitative research
  12. Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials
  13. Cross-boundary collaborations
  14. Honorary or gift authorship
  15. Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement
  16. Preregistration of animal study protocols
  17. Research Integrity lunch meetings
  18. Statistical pre-registration
  19. Research integrity training for PhD students
  20. Non-disclosure of changes to the research design
  21. Incidental research findings
  22. Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future.
  23. Consent and assent in research on children
  24. Peer review card game
  25. Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies
  26. Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies
  27. Ignoring substantial safety risks of studies
  28. Polarized research
  29. Conducting research in high risk locations
  30. Imposter Syndrome
  31. Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains
  32. The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group
  33. Posing irrelevant research questions
  34. Anonymous Authorship
  35. Publication
  36. Gender bias
  37. Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication
  38. Importance of healthy lifestyle
  39. Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting
  40. Predatory publishing
  41. How to be a good lab partner
  42. Retractions: correcting the scientific literature
  43. Qualitative research
  44. Virtues in research integrity
  45. Privacy in research
  46. Inappropriate authorship
  47. Grading the quality of evidence in clinical practice guidelines
  48. Research Integrity champions
  49. Selective citation
  50. The decision on ice
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.3.4