LoginSign up

Approved revisions

From The Embassy of Good Science

View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals

50 ss ordered by recently added

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Inappropriate study design
  2. Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas
  3. Balancing harms and benefits
  4. Keeping inadequate notes of the research process
  5. Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA)
  6. Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science
  7. Self-plagiarism
  8. Perverse incentives
  9. Informed assent
  10. Ethics in global digital psychiatry: balancing innovation and responsibility
  11. Fake peer-reviewing
  12. Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI
  13. Whistleblower protection/rights
  14. The ConScience App - theatre play
  15. Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review
  16. Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.
  17. Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature
  18. Canadian Tri-agency framework: Responsible Conduct of Research
  19. Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism
  20. Journal peer review
  21. European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work
  22. Code of Ethics of the Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education
  23. The Ghost Collaborator
  24. ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job
  25. Data sharing and dual-use issues
  26. Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study
  27. Who Owns the Field Notes
  28. The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland's Guidelines on Good Research Practice
  29. Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough
  30. Data anonymity
  31. Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
  32. Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did
  33. New claim to authorship of published paper
  34. Retraction notice - fake email peer-review
  35. Chinese 'Opinions' on Strengthening Research Integrity
  36. Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement
  37. Center for Open and REproducible Science (CORES)
  38. A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct
  39. Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice
  40. Declaration of Helsinki
  41. SOPs4RI Guidelines - Building and leading an effective team
  42. People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society
  43. Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd
  44. Authorship and Intellectual Property
  45. Inconsistent Findings Between Trainee and Researcher
  46. SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines
  47. Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct
  48. Faulty Drug Trials Tarnish Japan's Clinical Research
  49. UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
  50. Whistle-blower Claims his Accusations Cost him his Job
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://embassy.science:443/wiki/Special:ApprovedRevs"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information

Your platform for research integrity and ethics

Privacy statementTerms of serviceTake down policyContact
Let us keep you posted

Bluesky Logo.svg

The EnTIRE and VIRT2UE projects have received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research programme under grant agreements N 741782 and N 787580.

5.2.0