Approved revisions

From The Embassy of Good Science

50 ss ordered by recently added

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)
  2. Unfair reviewing
  3. Development and Value of National Research Integrity Codes
  4. Consent for publication (Author)
  5. Research misconduct
  6. Peer review
  7. Precision medicine – future?
  8. SCImago Journal Rankings
  9. Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective
  10. Ethical issues in qualitative research
  11. Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials
  12. Cross-boundary collaborations
  13. Honorary or gift authorship
  14. Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement
  15. Preregistration of animal study protocols
  16. Research Integrity lunch meetings
  17. Statistical pre-registration
  18. Research integrity training for PhD students
  19. Non-disclosure of changes to the research design
  20. Incidental research findings
  21. Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future.
  22. Consent and assent in research on children
  23. Peer review card game
  24. Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies
  25. Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies
  26. Ignoring substantial safety risks of studies
  27. Polarized research
  28. Conducting research in high risk locations
  29. Imposter Syndrome
  30. Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains
  31. The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group
  32. Posing irrelevant research questions
  33. Anonymous Authorship
  34. Publication
  35. Gender bias
  36. Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication
  37. Importance of healthy lifestyle
  38. Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting
  39. Ethical Challenges of AI-Driven Neurotechnology Devices
  40. Predatory publishing
  41. How to be a good lab partner
  42. Retractions: correcting the scientific literature
  43. Qualitative research
  44. Virtues in research integrity
  45. Privacy in research
  46. Inappropriate authorship
  47. Grading the quality of evidence in clinical practice guidelines
  48. Research Integrity champions
  49. Selective citation
  50. The decision on ice
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.9.1