Maintenance:ExportThemesTags

	Who	For whom is this important?	Where	When	Virtues & Values	Good Practices & Misconduct	Research Area
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress		PhD Students Students Researchers Supervisors Research integrity trainers					SH - Social Sciences and Humanities
Collaborative working		Researchers PhD students			Reliability Respect	Collaborative research
Conflict of interests		Researchers health care professionals academic staff			Honesty Transparency	Conflict of interest Financial conflict of interest Bias
Data Practices and Management		Academic staff Researchers
Development and Value of National Research Integrity Codes		Research Integrity Officers Researchers Policy makers Research performing organisations
Dialogue versus debate		PhD Students Researchers Supervisors Research integrity trainers			Collegiality	Ethical Dilemma	SH - Social Sciences and Humanities
Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity	NSRI	PhD students Postdocs Senior researchers Early career researchers Universities Research funding organisations	The Netherlands	2020	Honesty Transparency Scrupulousness Independence Responsibility
Epistemic virtues		Postdocs PhD students			Honesty	Moral reasoning Responsible research	SH - Social Sciences and Humanities
Funders		Research funding organisations Funders			Honesty Accountability	Funders’ responsibilities
How to be a good lab partner		Bachelor students Collaborating researchers Doctoral students Graduate and postgraduate students Junior researchers Laboratory researchers PhD Students Professors			Collaborative spirit Humility Gender Equality Fairness Professionalism	Good Practice Misconduct
Mertonian norms		everyone
Moral conflict and moral dilemma		PhD Students Researchers Supervisors Research integrity trainers			Reliability Conscientiousness Collegiality Fairness Responsibility	Balancing Harm and Benefits	SH - Social Sciences and Humanities
Peer review		Scientists Journal editors Students Peer reviewers Reviewers Researchers Editors Journals Journal publishers			Honesty Accountability Reliability Respect	Peer Review
Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers	ALLEA	Academic staff Advisors of students researchers Doctoral students Early career researchers Educators Mentors Funders			Accountability Respect	Mentor-trainee relationship Mentorship responsibilities
Preprint servers	Ernesto Galbán Rodríguez	Researchers Students Peer-reviewers Journal editors			Transparency Accountability	Open access Communication Open science
Protecting research subjects		PhD students Bachelor students Graduate students Undergraduate students Ethics committee members			Respect Accountability	Balancing harms and benefits Vulnerable and non-competent subjects Research with Humans	SH - Social Sciences and Humanities LS - Life Sciences
Publication	COPE	Early career researchers Editors Journal editors Journal publishers PhD Students		Present	Accountability Objectivity Fairness Honesty Openness Availability Transparency Professionalism	Peer Review Publication Ethics Peer review ethics violation Publication violation
Qualitative research		PhD Students Qualitative researchers Researchers health care professionals Graduate and postgraduate students
Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting		Early career researchers Junior researchers Senior researchers Researchers Scientists
Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration		All stakeholders in research Early career researchers Junior researchers Researchers Senior researchers
Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection		Early career researchers Junior researchers Researchers Senior researchers Scientists
Questionable Research Practices in Study Design		Early career researchers Junior researchers Reserchers Senior researchers Scientists
Replicability	Brian Nosek Michèle B Nuijten Edward Diener John Ioannidis	All stakeholders in research PhD Students Funders Journal editors			Reliability Accountability Transparency	Peer Review Pre-registrations Collaborative research Data Management	SH - Social Sciences and Humanities LS - Life Sciences
Replicability in the Humanities	Lex Bouter Rik Peels	Researchers Students Research institutions Peer-reviewers Journals			Transparency Accountability	Publication Ethics Data Management Responsible research	SH - Social Sciences and Humanities
Research culture		Academic staff Supervisors Senior researchers			Respect
Research metrics		phd students Scientists Researchers Journal editors			Accountability Fairness Reliability Honesty Precision Trustworthiness	Altmetrics
Research misconduct		Students PhD Students Research subjects Scientists Ethics committee members Principal investigators Researchers health care professionals academic staff Research institutions Policy makers Supervisors Postdocs Universities Funders Journal publishers Journal editors industry stakeholders Junior researchers Senior researchers Reviewers Teachers General public Research integrity trainers			Honesty Accountability Reliability	Research misconduct
Responsible mentoring		Researchers Students Research performing organisations Research funding organisations policy-makers in science			Reliability Honesty Respect Accountability Collegiality Professional courtesy and fairness Autonomy	Collaborative research Power abuse
The decision on ice		health care professionals Clinical researchers Educators Decision makers Human rights defenders Other Patients Physicians Reserchers					LS 07.08 - Health services, health care research
Values and norms	Guy Widdershoven Jan-Helge Solbakk	All stakeholders in research PhD students Junior researchers Senior researchers Research integrity trainers				Ethics
Virtues in research integrity		PhD Students Junior researchers Senior researchers Postdocs All stakeholders in research Research integrity trainers				Responsible research
Collaboration In Research	Office of Research Integrity	Academic institutions All stakeholders in research Bachelor students Collaborating researchers Graduate and postgraduate students Laboratory researchers	Malta		Accountability Respect Responsibility	Collaborative research
Cross-boundary collaborations		PhD students Senior researchers Junior researchers Supervisors General public			Accountability Reliability	Collaborative research
High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations		Senior researchers Funders Junior researchers			Autonomy Collegiality Professional courtesy and fairness	Collaborative research International collaboration Power abuse
Conflict of interest in peer review		Researchers Supervisors Journal publishers Journal editors Senior researchers			Honesty	Conflict of interest
Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective	COPE ICMJE ENERI	Researchers Research Ethics Committees Research Integrity Officers Journal editors Journal publishers Peer reviewers Research funding organisations			Objectivity Neutrality Impartiality Transparency Integrity	Conflict of interest
Editorial conflicts of interest		Editors Researchers			Accountability Transparency	Conflict of interest
Intellectual conflicts of interest		Research performing organisations Research funding organisations Senior researchers medical researchers PhD students Postdocs			Honesty Transparency Accountability	Conflict of interest Funders’ responsibilities Institutional responsibilities Bias
The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability		Academic staff Authors Clinical researchers Doctoral students Mentors Journal publishers Patients Administrators support staff Researchers PhD Students Principal investigators Everyone					LS 07.11 - Medical ethics LS 07.03 - Pharmacology, pharmacogenomics, drug discovery and design, drug therapy LS 04.06 - Cancer and its biological basis
Anonymisation and pseudonymisation		PhD Students Junior researchers Clinical researchers
Data management plans		Researchers Research organisations Academic staff Funders PhD students			Transparency Availability	Open access Data management Grant applications
FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results		All stakeholders in research			Honesty Transparency	Data Management Data sharing
Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies		Authors PhD Students Researchers Research subjects
How to select trustworthy repositories	Digital Curation Centre	Researchers Research organisations Academic staff Funders PhD students		2015	Transparency Availability	Open access Data management
Imputation of missing data in clinical trials	Victor Urbiola-Salvador	All stakeholders in research Clinical ethics consultants Clinical researchers Computer scientists Ethics committee members Research Ethics Committees		30/05/2022	Accountability Care Excellence	Bias Clinical trials	LS 02.10 - Bioinformatics LS 02.12 - Biostatistics
Methods to increase data availability		Authors Clinical researchers Junior researchers PhD Students Doctoral students Mentors researchers
Sharing and preserving data in repositories		All stakeholders in research			Transparency Availability	Open access Data management
Paper Mills		Academic institutions Publishers Journals Journal editors
Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals		Research funding organisations Funders Reviewers			Honesty	Conflict of interest Funders’ responsibilities
Industry funded research		Funders Researchers			Honesty Transparency	Funders’ responsibilities Collaborative research Collaborative science
... further results