Difference between revisions of "Resource:4bdb3879-4eb1-49b5-bcb9-e3e7ddf1a83e"

From The Embassy of Good Science
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Related To
 
{{Related To
|Related To Resource=Resource:0d7e30ee-699a-43ac-a653-7352844bb9b1;Resource:8bc7c681-66af-4ab9-b2f2-c21fe2744817
+
|Related To Resource=Resource:0d7e30ee-699a-43ac-a653-7352844bb9b1
 
|Related To Theme=Theme:Ab4200ca-c14d-413d-a9f6-aa5a93e1800e;Theme:177ca35b-14f3-4f62-8bb2-f9cf9db28a70;Theme:Bd54dd3d-50ed-4f42-b5fb-473f2391714a
 
|Related To Theme=Theme:Ab4200ca-c14d-413d-a9f6-aa5a93e1800e;Theme:177ca35b-14f3-4f62-8bb2-f9cf9db28a70;Theme:Bd54dd3d-50ed-4f42-b5fb-473f2391714a
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 11:49, 28 October 2020

Education

PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven)

What is this about?

This charter functions as a declaration between PhD researcher and supervisor and sketches the role of both in the doctoral process. At the start of the collaboration the supervisor and PhD researcher use the charter as a basis to make necessary arrangements concerning the supervision, thereby contributing to an effective and fruitful scientific collaboration. In order to not to overlook certain topics or aspects, a checklist is available.

Why is this important?

In order to prevent miscommunications such as different expectations, a thorough document with clear agreements on the collaboration and responsibility of the PhD researcher and the supervisor is important. For example it prevents early fall out, and contributes to an uncomplicated doctoral process and qualitative scientific output.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Where
Good Practices & Misconduct
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6