Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- 0.pdf phd studentsEarly career researchersPIPeer reviewersJournal editorsJournal publishers Common practises on standards of authorship vary between scientific4 KB (465 words) - 16:47, 25 March 2021
- to PhD students. Duration (hours) 12.5 Participants 25 For whom is this important? PhD StudentsJunior researchers Method eLearning Participatory sessions7 KB (929 words) - 15:29, 6 October 2022
- Predatory publishing (section Why is this important?)studentsMaster students Lists of predatory publishers (blacklists) as well as lists of high quality open access publishers (whitelists) are of great value to researchers9 KB (1,354 words) - 17:40, 26 March 2021
- and Best Practice Guidelines for Editors and Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers Journal editors often need to make difficult decisions about allegations3 KB (278 words) - 16:46, 25 March 2021
- attributing them for their work, but also the original publishers. It is important to recognize journals that do steal the work of others as fast as possible2 KB (179 words) - 14:50, 5 August 2021
- ations-that-authors-should-provide-at-the-journal-submission-stage. When submitting an article to a journal, author’s consent for publication must be attached6 KB (807 words) - 15:19, 27 May 2021
- scholarly journals. It facilitates journal editors to become transparent about their editorial procedures, advises journal editors and publishers on potential2 KB (259 words) - 15:36, 22 October 2021
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper? (section Why is this important?)discussion mainly for those involved in publishing. Journal publishersJournal editorsAcademic staffPublishers Cases Open About954 bytes (93 words) - 12:37, 28 June 2021
- Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings (section Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings)useful for researchers, PhD students, journal editors and publishers. ResearchersPhD StudentsJournal editorsPublishers428 bytes (30 words) - 15:29, 3 May 2021
- not have the means for subscription to expensive journals. The initiative recommends scholarly publishers to make their abstracts more visible and easily3 KB (415 words) - 09:28, 9 September 2021
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” (section Why is this important?)research are important, and editors and publishers are nonetheless part of it. AuthorsReviewersEditorsJournal editorsJournal publishers Cases Open About1,006 bytes (87 words) - 12:24, 6 July 2021
- Think. Check. Submit. (section Why is this important?)Submit is an initiative that helps researchers identify trusted journals and publishers for their research. Through a range of tools and practical resources1 KB (142 words) - 20:31, 31 August 2020
- to individual researchers and their institutions but also to journal editors and publishers; although such cases have so far been less frequently encountered2 KB (183 words) - 12:30, 6 July 2021
- Plan S (section Why is this important?)plan for Plan S. Nurs Open. 2019;6(2):206-7. EveryoneJournal publishersFunding institutionsPublishers The main principle of Plan S states that all research3 KB (424 words) - 15:15, 22 October 2021
- asks about the appropriate course of action in such situations. Journal publishersPublishersResearchersReviewers American Sociological Association Reliability1 KB (116 words) - 13:56, 23 April 2021
- bodies offer comprehensive sections on peer-reviewing ReserchersJournal editorsJournal publishers Christos Damalas 9/4/2020 Peer Review LS 09.05 - Agriculture1 KB (99 words) - 16:02, 21 June 2021
- High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS) (section Why is this important?)SSH disciplines. The platform collaborates with 120 publishers and provides services for publishers, libraries and research funders for deposit, quality6 KB (746 words) - 10:05, 19 October 2021
- AI Generated Content (section Why is this important?)interesting questions relating to authorship. AI generated content presents important questions for conceptions of integrity in research and authorship, because4 KB (529 words) - 17:20, 17 April 2024
- Self-plagiarism (section Why is this important?)work, you usually sign a contract with the journal, by which you transfer copyright rights to the publisher. That way, when you copy your own work, you3 KB (420 words) - 11:45, 27 March 2021
- Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review (section For whom is this important?)environmental journal were retracted following investigations on claims that the peer-review process had been compromised. EditorsJournal publishersJournal editorsPeer694 bytes (49 words) - 14:13, 21 June 2021
- 2021 Cases Open About Retractions: correcting the scientific literature Publishers - COPE guidelines Self-plagiarism Ana Marušić Mario Malički Honesty Publication4 KB (553 words) - 17:43, 26 March 2021
- Peer review (section Why is this important?)2017 Mar 22. ScientistsJournal editorsStudentsPeer reviewersReviewersResearchersEditorsJournalsJournal publishers Different publishers have a different set4 KB (564 words) - 14:06, 22 October 2021
- Epub 2018 Aug 21. PMID: 30132025. ResearchersUniversitiesJournal editorsJournalsJournal publishers Retractions: correcting the scientific literature Conflict2 KB (250 words) - 16:59, 19 August 2021
- copyright infringement. Academic staffAnthropologistsJournal editorsJournal publishersPublishers Honesty Respect Accountability Research Environments Research688 bytes (51 words) - 00:03, 4 May 2021
- Research misconduct (section Why is this important?)outline the responsibilities of journal editors and publishers in their ‘core practices’ here. Recommendations include: "Journals must take seriously allegations6 KB (704 words) - 11:49, 27 March 2021
- rejected by journal A, it has yet to hear back from author X, if indeed it does at all. Journal A feels that it is important that journals B, C and D are2 KB (371 words) - 14:31, 24 November 2021
- Fake peer-reviewing (section Why is this important?)scam-1.16400 Journal editorsJournal publishersAuthorsPhD studentsPostdocs Considering fake review, there are several strategies journals can implement5 KB (733 words) - 10:42, 28 October 2020
- Serbian Journal Lands in Hot Water After Challenge on 24 hour Peer Review That Cost 1785 euros (section For whom is this important?)Corruption Nepotism Coercion Archives of Biological Sciences Publisher Error Society Journal Retractions Biological Sciences Plant Biology670 bytes (37 words) - 21:02, 26 May 2020
- punish misconduct on the part of journal editors, the social and economic power unbalance between authors and publishers suggests the importance of alternative1 KB (134 words) - 16:31, 2 December 2021
- UKRIO's Guidance for researchers on retractions in academic journals (section Why is this important?)Guidelines Although the COPE guidelines provide guidance to editors and publishers on authorship and publication practices, this awareness needs to spread1 KB (131 words) - 15:03, 28 February 2022
- Perverse incentives (section Why is this important?)be confronted with incentives that do not promote good science. It is important that scientists are incentivized to do good science and be good scientists3 KB (343 words) - 12:04, 23 October 2020
- -as-co-author-on-a-paper-without-my-consent Journal editorsPublishersResearchers Institutions and journals need to have clear guidelines on publication3 KB (359 words) - 10:48, 28 October 2020
- the paper (but providing no specifics). Academic institutionsJournal editorsJournal publishers 2016944 bytes (109 words) - 14:41, 24 November 2021
- under increasing pressure to publish in high quality journals. The amount of space available in a journal such as Medical Education has not kept pace with832 bytes (94 words) - 16:28, 2 December 2021
- Data anonymity (section For whom is this important?)presenting symptom, as well as laboratory parameters and outcome. Journal editorsJournal publishers 2016892 bytes (121 words) - 14:27, 24 November 2021
- submitted it to another journal. The manuscript was accepted for publication. However, the editor in-chief of the English journal managed to find out about2 KB (198 words) - 17:35, 8 March 2021
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations (section Why is this important?)recommendations on the conduct, report, editing and publication of scholarly work in journals are the leading recommendations in the field of medical sciences on authorship2 KB (150 words) - 11:33, 28 October 2020
- COPE Cases (section Why is this important?)collection of guidelines on publication ethics. Guidelines Open About Publishers - COPE guidelines Predatory publishing COPE United Kingdom Accountability1 KB (102 words) - 14:57, 4 November 2020
- publishing suspicious manuscripts in other journals. Academic institutionsEditorsJournal editorsJournal publishers Data Practices and Management COPE 20181 KB (115 words) - 14:07, 24 November 2021
- Publication (section Why is this important?)Theory'', ''48''(14), 1401-1425. Early career researchersEditorsJournal editorsJournal publishersPhD Students Nowadays, ‘good publication’ is considered to be4 KB (438 words) - 13:06, 4 December 2020
- org/2012/04/02/does-post-dating-publication-helps-journal-impact-factors/. Krell F T. Academic publishers’ time-loop: another mechanism to manipulate impact5 KB (668 words) - 12:56, 11 June 2021
- Potential figure manipulation with corresponding author uncontactable (section For whom is this important?)affect the scientific results or conclusions of the paper. Journal editorsJournal publishers Data Practices and Management 20171 KB (166 words) - 14:15, 24 November 2021
- data files it is difficult to make a conclusive judgement. Journal editorsJournal publishers 20172 KB (377 words) - 14:20, 24 November 2021
- Misconduct, Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 529–539. AuthorsJournal editorsJournal publishersJunior researchersEarly career researchers The case provides2 KB (180 words) - 17:15, 26 February 2021
- Post-publication review. A tale of woe. BMJ. 2010;341:c5147. EditorsReviewersJournal publishersJournal editors The most famous practice example of post publication peer3 KB (450 words) - 13:04, 19 April 2022
- Author accused of stealing research and publishing under their name (section For whom is this important?)of little help as there are so many people with the name. Journal editorsJournal publishers 20162 KB (259 words) - 14:24, 24 November 2021
- retraction notices should be made as effective as possible. JournalsJournal editorsPublishersResearchers863 bytes (98 words) - 16:14, 6 June 2023
- Polarized research (section Why is this important?)and (b) to discount arguments and data that would normally be taken as important in a scientific debate.” The same data may be analysed and presented as5 KB (614 words) - 21:29, 1 February 2021
- Selective citation (section Why is this important?)2013;23(3):237-41. StudentsPhD StudentsScientistsResearchersSupervisorsPostdocsJournal publishersJournal editorsJunior researchersSenior researchersReviewers The correct3 KB (361 words) - 11:45, 3 February 2021
- Altmetrics (section Why is this important?)Twitter, LinkedIn or Facebook. Measuring that part of online impact is important as it offers different insights into popularity and use of published articles2 KB (313 words) - 17:28, 26 March 2021
- Guest Authorship, Mortality Reporting, and Integrity in Rofecoxib Studies (section Why is this important?)Therefore, it is important to openly discuss accusations of guest authorship made in publications, as is done in the present case. ResearchersJournal editorsJournal2 KB (187 words) - 14:26, 19 August 2021
- Interest in Journal Peer Review: Toxicol Pathol. 2018 Feb;46(2):112-114. doi: 10.1177/0192623318754792. Epub 2018 Jan 30. ResearchersSupervisorsJournal publishersJournal3 KB (439 words) - 17:41, 26 March 2021
- StudentsPhD StudentsScientistsResearchersJournal publishers If a study’s methodology is valid, it is important to publish all of the results, including4 KB (558 words) - 11:33, 27 March 2021
- studentsPeer reviewersJournal editorsPublishersFunding agencies To prevent funding bias, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requires7 KB (1,013 words) - 13:23, 9 February 2023
- Guest Post — Unethical Practices in Research and Publishing: Evidence from Russia (section Why is this important?)still continuously violated even in the 'clear daylight'. Journal editorsJournal publishersAuthors Russia Honesty Ghost authorship960 bytes (82 words) - 13:17, 28 June 2021
- Salami publication (section Why is this important?)l-issues/overlapping-publications.html PhD StudentsResearchersJournal publishersJournal editorsJunior researchersSenior researchers The Embassy Editorial3 KB (373 words) - 11:43, 27 March 2021
- sourceHistory Find out Resources Cases After a thorough investigation, the Publisher has concluded that the Editor was misled into accepting this article based832 bytes (82 words) - 16:22, 2 December 2021
- merits authorship. AuthorsGraduate and postgraduate studentsResearchersJournal publishers American Sociological Association Honesty Respect Collaborative research933 bytes (95 words) - 14:29, 23 April 2021
- Academic staffAuthorsClinical researchersDoctoral studentsMentorsJournal publishersPatientsAdministratorssupport staffResearchersPhD StudentsPrincipal982 bytes (102 words) - 22:40, 22 February 2021
- access . The adoption of open access practices however differs between publishers and research fields. Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias3 KB (364 words) - 18:55, 25 March 2021
- Outcome reporting bias (section Why is this important?)society’s trust in science. StudentsPhD StudentsPostdocsFundersJournal publishersJournal editorsJunior researchersSenior researchers The use of appropriate4 KB (551 words) - 11:36, 27 March 2021
- for retracting articles. 2010. The integrity of the scientific record is important because published research serves as a basis for new research or application7 KB (880 words) - 11:18, 18 August 2021
- data mining. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(1). Principal investigatorsResearchersPolicy makersSupervisorsPostdocsJournal publishersJournal editors By4 KB (549 words) - 21:44, 1 February 2021
- https://retractionwatch. com/2018/07/page/3/) (2018). Peer review is an important process to detect the flaws of to-be-published papers. This step of the2 KB (239 words) - 21:24, 27 October 2020
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Why is this important?)research misconduct Plagiarism Theme:F3ddbf9b-e3c4-47b7-97cd-6239ce7a32c3 Publishers - COPE guidelines Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors4 KB (408 words) - 15:22, 19 October 2021
- Plagiarism (section Why is this important?)increasingly checking student essays and theses using plagiarism check software. Publishers can also use similar software to undertake similarity checks on submitted3 KB (389 words) - 11:50, 27 March 2021
- ResearchersResearch institutionsPolicy makersSupervisorsPostdocsJournal publishersJournal editorsJunior researchersSenior researchersDoctoral studentsProfessors3 KB (381 words) - 14:37, 20 October 2020
- membersResearchersResearch institutionsPolicy makersSupervisorsPostdocsJournal publishersJournal editorsindustry stakeholdersJunior researchersSenior researchersGeneral3 KB (392 words) - 15:16, 22 October 2021
- their science. ResearchersDoctoral studentsEarly career researchersJournal publishers About Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification Research integrity in practice:1 KB (113 words) - 18:59, 25 October 2020
- Preprint servers (section Why is this important?)played an important role in physics, astronomy and mathematics, and later was implemented into other research areas. Significant number of journals has adopted10 KB (1,346 words) - 11:20, 26 May 2021
- such as enhanced funding and publication opportunities. Authorship has important academic implications and authors are accountable for published research6 KB (738 words) - 13:40, 7 October 2021
- Reward campaign (section Why is this important?)reduced through research regulation and management. It emphasizes the important role and influence of research regulators who, along with policy makers4 KB (505 words) - 15:26, 22 October 2021
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective (section Why is this important?)addition to their potential effects on research integrity, COIs have an important research ethics dimension as well, especially in biomedical research.[3]10 KB (1,482 words) - 16:11, 15 October 2021
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Why is this important?)Peer review Plagiarism Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies (PREP) Publishers - COPE guidelines Fairness Honesty Responsibility Respect Allegation of4 KB (422 words) - 15:23, 19 October 2021
- developed by the participants to support data producers, scientists and data publishers to take full advantage of the generation of data. Four foundational principles6 KB (873 words) - 14:17, 22 October 2021