Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- 02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (section Good Practices & Misconduct)aware of the complexities of using moral theories for non-philosophers, his version of the model provides a framework for an orderly discussion of ethical7 KB (856 words) - 13:19, 8 August 2021
- Authorship criteria (section Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct)to the accuracy or completeness of any part of the work are properly investigated and resolved. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations:8 KB (1,039 words) - 18:49, 25 March 2021
- Researcher 2000 United States Accountability Plagiarism Allegation of Misconduct Plagiarism Allegation672 bytes (52 words) - 14:31, 5 March 2021
- requests of (any one from a) non-member organisation, but in general it will do so in cases of severe and founded allegations of research misconduct with a8 KB (1,119 words) - 15:14, 11 December 2019
- Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct (section Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct)2021 Education Open About Education Open About Research misconduct Honesty Allegations of misconduct Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism1 KB (126 words) - 15:07, 22 October 2021
- Dishonesty 2011 Denmark Honesty Respect Plagiarism Publication Ethics Allegation of Misconduct2 KB (165 words) - 15:03, 10 August 2020
- research conduct issue and may be considering whether to make an allegation of misconduct. It is important that staff and students have the opportunity to1 KB (209 words) - 15:24, 22 October 2021
- Polish National Science Centre Code on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Responsibility Transparency Adherence to Regulations Allegation of Misconduct Misconduct Investigations Research Misconduct Investigation2 KB (169 words) - 17:31, 20 October 2020
- The Flemish Council for Scientific Integrity's Guidelines on Plagiarism in Funding Applications (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Council for Research Integrity (VCW) 2017 Belgium Transparency Allegation of Misconduct Failure of Acknowledgment2 KB (163 words) - 12:03, 18 October 2021
- Honesty Respect Conflict of Interest Science Policy Allegation of Misconduct Duty to Disclose Commercial Interest Primary Interest of Academic Practice Secondary2 KB (256 words) - 16:16, 25 August 2020
- Capacity Misrepresentation Allegation of Misconduct Academic Responsibility of University Research in a Personal Capacity Scope of University's Complaints2 KB (237 words) - 13:08, 25 August 2020
- Serious Accusation of Negligence of Ethical Principles in Human Sciences (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)publication, the allegation was serious and the complainant had solid grounds for the validity of the allegation. Accordingly, TENK demanded that the institutions2 KB (228 words) - 15:53, 2 September 2020
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)Respect Disparaging and Derogatory Remarks Inappropriate Behaviour Allegation of Misconduct Academic Reputation Engineering and Technology LS 07.01 - Medical2 KB (224 words) - 18:07, 8 March 2021
- Honesty Respect Reliability Plagiarism Research Misconduct Institutional Responsibilities Allegation of Misconduct Whistleblowing Funders’ responsibilities Good3 KB (316 words) - 16:33, 21 October 2020
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Falsification Authorship Publication Ethics Image Manipulation Allegation of Misconduct Research Protocol Manipulation Reusing Published Material Reusing3 KB (339 words) - 19:07, 25 October 2020
- Honesty Respect Reliability Plagiarism Research Misconduct Institutional Responsibilities Allegation of Misconduct Whistleblowing Funders’ responsibilities Good2 KB (277 words) - 16:31, 21 October 2020
- methodology. According to research misconduct guidelines from the UK Research Integrity Office (UKRIO), when an allegation of misconduct is made to the organization5 KB (727 words) - 15:41, 10 June 2021
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (section Listen to and Recognise the Early Views and Associated Reasons of All Other Members of the Committee)Responsibility Accountability Transparency Academic Responsibility of University Allegations of misconduct Communication Complaints procedure Ethical Dilemma Good12 KB (1,620 words) - 13:20, 8 August 2021
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)Accountability Honesty Reliability Respect Research Misconduct Institutional Responsibilities Allegation of Misconduct Whistleblowing Funders’ responsibilities Good4 KB (441 words) - 16:34, 21 October 2020
- Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges (section Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges)requires that “upon receiving an allegation of research misconduct,” the university must “immediately assess the allegation.” Thus UND appointed a faculty2 KB (184 words) - 16:11, 26 October 2020
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Whistleblowing and the monitoring of research misconduct; Barriers to reporting cases of research misconduct; Power imbalances between students/early-career4 KB (432 words) - 15:23, 19 October 2021
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Research with humans The impact of the GDPR on scientific data Fairness Honesty Respect Responsibility Allegation of Misconduct Balancing harms and benefits4 KB (436 words) - 15:24, 19 October 2021
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Non-reporting of negative findings Outcome reporting bias P-value hacking Fairness Honesty Respect Responsibility Allegation of Misconduct Bias Experimental4 KB (407 words) - 15:20, 19 October 2021
- Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)guidelines to handle cases of alleged research misconduct. The objective of the guidelines was to recognise research misconduct and to establish common norms1 KB (151 words) - 14:39, 20 October 2020
- Legal rights of accused scientists (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)policies and procedures for research misconduct Research misconduct Transparency Allegations of misconduct Research Misconduct Investigation2 KB (174 words) - 15:07, 22 October 2021
- Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct (section Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct)Resources Guidelines In order to maintain high standards of research integrity, allegations of misconduct are taken seriously at the Dublin City University (DCU)759 bytes (58 words) - 11:27, 28 September 2022
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)guidelines Fairness Honesty Responsibility Respect Allegation of Misconduct Citing Complaints procedure Conflict of Interest Editorial review Good Practice Peer4 KB (422 words) - 15:23, 19 October 2021
- Fabrication (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)Fabrication is one of the most severe violations of research integrity. It is considered serious research misconduct. In the European Code of Conduct fabrication3 KB (370 words) - 12:08, 16 October 2020
- About Scenarios Open About Fairness Honesty Respect Responsibility Allegation of Misconduct Anonymization Authorship Bias Beneficence Citing Collaborative6 KB (646 words) - 15:24, 22 October 2021
- difficult decisions about allegations of misconduct, authorship disputes, conflicts of interest, lack of ethical oversight of a submission, and so on. The3 KB (278 words) - 16:46, 25 March 2021
- ‘right’ answer All stakeholders in research Research misconduct UKRIO United Kingdom Allegations of misconduct1 KB (164 words) - 12:36, 30 September 2020
- The Lab: Avoiding Research Misconduct (section European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct)States Honesty Respect Allegations of misconduct Research misconduct Whistleblowing Mentor/trainee relationship Allegations of misconduct Data management Authorship2 KB (235 words) - 11:47, 23 October 2020
- violations of good research practice or allegations of misconduct are handled in different countries. However, it always is in the interest of society and5 KB (539 words) - 15:11, 22 October 2021
- Belgium Reliability Honesty Authorship Conflict of interest Plagiarism Data management Allegations of misconduct811 bytes (82 words) - 10:24, 22 September 2020
- second volume on responsible research, the result of the panel of experts of the National Academy of Sciences. It includes papers and institutional reports921 bytes (85 words) - 13:41, 29 September 2020
- COPE flowcharts (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Publication ethics Peer review Conflict of interest Intellectual property Data management Allegations of misconduct https://publicationethics.org/guidance/Flowcharts691 bytes (67 words) - 09:34, 27 May 2020
- the first volume of textbook on resposnible research and the result of a two-year study by a panel of experts of the National Academy of Sciences. It investigates945 bytes (91 words) - 13:39, 29 September 2020
- Research misconduct Authorship Conflict of interest Data management Reproducability Peer review Intellectual property Allegations of misconduct1,020 bytes (112 words) - 17:23, 19 August 2021
- guidelines. Research misconduct: Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Guidelines of the Finnish Advisory24 KB (2,121 words) - 11:14, 10 April 2024
- management Social responsibilities Safety Work environment Allegations of misconduct Conflict of interest Authorship916 bytes (78 words) - 13:04, 29 September 2020
- research misconduct. They work for the good of their institution and the whole scientific community. The consequences of scientific misconduct are far-reaching4 KB (606 words) - 15:11, 22 October 2021
- ORI Infographics (section Research misconduct)Fabrication Falsification Research misconduct Whistleblowing Questionable research practice Allegations of misconduct Plagiarism Authorship Mentor/trainee1 KB (124 words) - 11:48, 28 October 2020
- UKRIO's Procedure for the investigation of misconduct in research (section UKRIO's Procedure for the investigation of misconduct in research)UK. As part of their responsibilities, they provide guidelines on handling research misconducts, including principles and practical aspects of the investigation1 KB (123 words) - 14:55, 28 February 2022
- Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale (section Good Practices & Misconduct)2-11-2014 2014 USA United States Respect Allegations of misconduct Sexual harassment Factual case Lewin, T. "Handling of sexual harassment case poses larger1 KB (149 words) - 11:02, 17 September 2020
- Major indexing service rejects appeals by two suppressed journals (section Good Practices & Misconduct)an interesting case for several reasons. Firstly, it shows that allegations of misconduct are not restricted to individual researchers and their institutions2 KB (183 words) - 12:30, 6 July 2021
- European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct (section European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct)Violations and Allegations of Misconduct”. The Handbook consists of detailed practical recommendations on how to deal with research misconduct and other unacceptable2 KB (196 words) - 14:35, 20 October 2020
- The Manchester University's Code of Practice for Investigating Concerns about the Conduct of Research (section The Manchester University's Code of Practice for Investigating Concerns about the Conduct of Research)at large. Therefore, allegations of misconduct are to be taken seriously, while simultaneously preserving the confidentiality of the complainants and respondents1 KB (110 words) - 13:41, 28 February 2022
- and practices. The Guidelines for the Investigation of Misconduct in Research do not oblige adoption of a single standardised procedure but provide principles22 KB (1,855 words) - 19:08, 24 October 2021
- example of the many formats that plagiarism can take (see also Loui, 2002). It is also a reminder of how easily and, often unintentional, breech of ethical2 KB (180 words) - 17:15, 26 February 2021
- with cases of research misconduct. The procedures are described by the internal Code of Conduct of each institution . The publication of cases of misconduct20 KB (1,674 words) - 10:50, 25 October 2021
- the highest standards of research integrity Embedding a culture of research integrity Dealing with allegations of research misconduct A commitment to strengthening1 KB (156 words) - 16:16, 28 September 2022
- constitute misconduct and are intentional deceptions. The Office of Research Integrity defines research misconduct as follows: Research misconduct is ‘fabrication6 KB (704 words) - 11:49, 27 March 2021
- General Code of Ethics in Scientific Research (Romanian Ministry of Education, Research and Youth) (section General Code of Ethics in Scientific Research (Romanian Ministry of Education, Research and Youth))This Code of Conduct, developed by the Romanian Ministry of Education, Research and Youth, sets for the deontological principles and norms of behavior expected956 bytes (81 words) - 13:13, 12 January 2022
- ENERI Classroom (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Dealing with violations and allegations of misconduct Whistleblowing and whistleblower protection Mentoring for stronger cultures of integrity. The topic research5 KB (674 words) - 11:37, 17 July 2023
- Loui, Michael C. "Seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct." Science and Engineering Ethics 8.4 (2002): 529-539. Education2 KB (263 words) - 14:23, 5 March 2021
- UK Research Council's Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct (section Good Practices & Misconduct)guidelines for reporting and investigating allegations of research misconduct clarifies the respective responsibilities of the Research Councils and Research Organisations2 KB (146 words) - 16:17, 28 September 2022
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct (section NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct)handling of Allegation/ Complaints of possible misconduct in research, received by NTU Academic staffAdministratorsAcademic institutionsAdvisors of studentsAll691 bytes (37 words) - 11:30, 25 January 2023
- Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study (section Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study)Oxford 2017 United Kingdom University of Oxford Respect Accountability Plagiarism Plagiarism Allegation Duplication LS - Life Sciences741 bytes (54 words) - 17:39, 8 March 2021
- The rector who resigned after plagiarizing a student’s PhD thesis (section Good Practices & Misconduct)translated to another language. Academic staffAuthors Poland Plagiarism Allegation755 bytes (64 words) - 14:25, 28 June 2021
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct (section Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct)The Handbook might be of help answering to questions related to how to deal with misconduct cases. How should research misconduct be defined and how will2 KB (193 words) - 11:27, 22 December 2020
- Some cases of proven misconduct were published in media. The investigation of alleged cases of misconduct is confidential i.e. the identity of whistleblowers25 KB (1,857 words) - 18:21, 22 October 2021
- practices, enabling of consultation and intervision, and providing advice to decision makers. As for allegations of research misconduct, research institutions32 KB (1,866 words) - 12:13, 5 November 2021
- cases, Luxembourg follows the guidelines of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and of the League of European Research Universities “Towards21 KB (2,033 words) - 20:42, 21 January 2022
- Copy and paste: A slow university investigation into serious accusations of misconduct benefits no one (section Copy and paste: A slow university investigation into serious accusations of misconduct benefits no one)accused of wrong-doing. This factual case demonstrates that there may be a significant time lapse between the noticing and reporting of a case of plagiarism2 KB (182 words) - 17:53, 26 February 2021
- Governance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe (section Governance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe)the level of institutional committees are conflicts of interest, fear of reputational damage, lack of time due to the voluntary nature of the task, and5 KB (698 words) - 15:13, 22 October 2021
- violations allegations. For example, double submission may be in order to increase one's list of publications but it can also derive by luck of communication912 bytes (97 words) - 15:59, 2 July 2021
- There is an interesting discussion about definitions of research misconduct, responsibilities of different bodies and suggestions for ways forward. Academic918 bytes (82 words) - 17:52, 29 June 2021
- Misconduct? It's all academic (section Copy and paste: A slow university investigation into serious accusations of misconduct benefits no one)quagmire, strain and bad press of misconduct investigations leave many universities tempted to ignore misconduct allegations. But getting an investigation708 bytes (58 words) - 11:48, 2 December 2021
- copy of a paper authored by the Eli Biham, the dean of computer science at the Technion Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa. It shows a case of misconduct952 bytes (92 words) - 18:54, 25 October 2020
- Resources Cases This is the factual case of a professor in chemistry who allegedly stole others' work and the reluctance of his academic institution to deal appropriately589 bytes (51 words) - 15:52, 2 July 2021
- appropriately. It also provides another example of the possible outcomes of investigation of plagiarism allegations. Academic staffAuthorsDoctoral studentsResearch1 KB (120 words) - 14:25, 5 March 2021
- University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions (section University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions)This is a factual case. Allegations of data fabrication and authorship issues have led to the retraction of a large volume of papers authored by a bone812 bytes (61 words) - 13:01, 6 July 2021
- important general principles of good research integrity, what constitutes misconduct and the handling of misconduct allegations, which can be adapted to specific794 bytes (68 words) - 17:14, 1 March 2022
- the case of a social psychology researcher who was investigated for allegations of data fabrication. The researcher has had more than 3 dozens of publications933 bytes (92 words) - 12:35, 28 June 2021
- responsible for dealing with cases of research misconduct and they should be notified if an alleged case of research misconduct has occurred. By performing these4 KB (546 words) - 15:10, 22 October 2021
- Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America (section Good Practices & Misconduct)court; the majority of research-related cases are settled prior to trial. The article concludes that, although limited, this body of case law informs researchers2 KB (199 words) - 16:13, 19 October 2020
- Macchiarini may be dismissed from Karolinska; dean of research resigns (section Macchiarini may be dismissed from Karolinska; dean of research resigns)factual case of a trachea transplant surgeon whose research and practice have made him famous for advancements in transplant medicine. Misconduct investigations837 bytes (78 words) - 15:42, 5 July 2021
- questions about academic integrity at the top of a research system that is already riven with misconduct allegations. Academic institutionsMediaResearch Integrity852 bytes (93 words) - 16:08, 2 December 2021
- handle expressions of concern and actual allegations of potential errors. Protection of whistleblowers, clarity about the rights of both whistleblowers2 KB (284 words) - 10:38, 28 October 2020
- standards of conduct for all members of the university, covering many aspects that are not addressed by legal texts. It highlights the core values of education:1 KB (122 words) - 13:11, 1 March 2022
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Good Practices & Misconduct)national codes of conduct; The navigation of the differences between discipline-specific, institutional and national codes of conduct; Allegations of conflicts4 KB (488 words) - 15:24, 19 October 2021
- University. Research misconduct. 2021 March 5. [cited 2021 July 9]. Available from: https://codex.uu.se/profesional-ethics/misconduct/ A total of 3 guidelines20 KB (1,613 words) - 11:42, 22 October 2021
- for Education, Science and Technology of the Parliament of the Republic of Croatia from 2014 is based on a series of Croatian documents and publications16 KB (1,767 words) - 17:53, 21 October 2021