Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available (section Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available)process of peer review involves a thorough evaluation of the research methodology and findings by experts or colleagues in the field (“peers”). The main9 KB (1,314 words) - 17:30, 27 October 2021
- four World Conferences on Research Integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(1), p.17. Bouter, L.M., Tijdink, J., Axelsen, N., Martinson, B.C. and2 KB (310 words) - 15:28, 13 July 2021
- susceptible to fraud than other disciplines. They also evaluate whether the peer review process and replications work well in practice to detect fraud. This is1 KB (131 words) - 19:11, 25 October 2020
- four World Conferences on Research Integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2016 Dec 1;1(1):17. An appropriate, transparent, and meticulous study3 KB (392 words) - 23:00, 27 October 2020
- basic principles and standards for all peer-reviewers. They can be applied across disciplines. Peer reviewers Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities457 bytes (35 words) - 22:48, 24 October 2020
- relationship Data management Collaborative research Conflict of interest Peer review Moral reasoning Social responsibilities530 bytes (42 words) - 16:44, 13 March 2020
- research ENRIO Europe Authorship Plagiarism Mentor/trainee relationship Peer review Data management Conflict of interest Questionable research practice Research474 bytes (36 words) - 15:04, 26 May 2020
- concerns responsible authorship and peer review and raises questions on ethical challenges that both authors and peer reviewers often face. The quick guide622 bytes (61 words) - 13:41, 25 September 2020
- publishing monographs process: optional proposal, submission, internal review, peer review, copy editing, production and publication. One of the HIRMEOS objectives6 KB (746 words) - 10:05, 19 October 2021
- management Conflict of interest Financial responsibilities Whistleblowing Peer review Copyright738 bytes (71 words) - 13:17, 28 September 2020
- stakeholders in research COPE United Kingdom Authorship Publication ethics Peer review Conflict of interest Intellectual property Data management Allegations691 bytes (67 words) - 09:34, 27 May 2020
- researcher must face a review board when he has not finished his assignment. FundersSupervisorsReviewers Cases Open About Fake peer-reviewing Reliability Accountability567 bytes (34 words) - 14:19, 6 April 2021
- online archives or repositories that contain research papers before their peer review and publication. Their main aim is to accelerate dissemination process10 KB (1,346 words) - 11:20, 26 May 2021
- trainee relationship; publication practices and responsible authorship; peer review; collaborative science; research on humans; research on laboratory animals;2 KB (215 words) - 11:11, 28 October 2020
- four World Conferences on Research Integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(1), p.17. Integrity in analysis and reporting of results is important4 KB (556 words) - 10:06, 28 October 2020
- sourceHistory Find out Resources Cases This is a factual case. Researchers Peer review Respect Accountability REC approval Informed consent Institutional Responsibilities524 bytes (26 words) - 18:57, 25 October 2020
- center 2015 United States Data management Research with Humans Authorship Peer review Grant applications Mentor/trainee relationship Research with Animals Biomedical761 bytes (68 words) - 14:48, 1 October 2020
- Hazardous substances Research with Humans Mentor/trainee relationship Peer review Data management Whistleblowing Biomedical sciences PE - Physical Sciences880 bytes (79 words) - 14:34, 1 October 2020
- Ethical decision making Authorship Research misconduct Whistleblowing Peer review Research with animals Intellectual property811 bytes (71 words) - 11:30, 9 November 2020
- United States honesty Reliability Mentor/trainee relationship Plagiarism Peer review Collaborative research Research with Humans Data management Social responsibilities916 bytes (78 words) - 13:04, 29 September 2020
- integrity trainers Queensland University of Technology OREI 2018 Australia Peer review Conflict of Interest Authorship Authorship and Contribution Public Communication937 bytes (88 words) - 15:57, 6 August 2020
- management Mentor/trainee relationship Publication ethics Authorship Peer review Collaborative research Research misconduct795 bytes (74 words) - 09:32, 22 September 2020
- academic publication: authorship and peer review The Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review course aims to stimulate PhD candidates3 KB (616 words) - 13:52, 15 February 2024
- Kim Wee Gunsalus et al. 2011 US Honesty Accountability FFP Authorship Peer review Research with humans Research with animals816 bytes (70 words) - 13:54, 5 November 2020
- with Humans Research with Animals Biosecurity Societal responsibilities Peer review Stem cell research Whistleblowing Mentoring Social responsibility Conflict870 bytes (83 words) - 13:31, 25 September 2020
- Reliability Accountability Conflict of interest Falsification Fabrication Peer review Clinical medicine675 bytes (49 words) - 15:55, 26 October 2020
- initiative to build a database of journal policies, focussing on open peer review, co-reviewing and detailed preprinting policies. The goal of this initiative993 bytes (112 words) - 20:36, 31 August 2020
- Interest data collection, storage and interpretation Plagiarism Authorship Peer Review LS 07.08 - Health services, health care research LS - Life Sciences PE1 KB (118 words) - 12:04, 2 October 2020
- Europe Reliability Honesty Respect Accountability Research misconduct Peer review Authorship Open access Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism Research with976 bytes (95 words) - 11:44, 25 September 2020
- misconduct Authorship Conflict of interest Data management Reproducability Peer review Intellectual property Allegations of misconduct1,020 bytes (112 words) - 17:23, 19 August 2021
- Brummel Gunsalus Anderson Loui 2010 US RCR Authorship Conflict of interest Peer review Interpersonal conflicts in mentoring Data management Whistleblowing Professional986 bytes (95 words) - 14:35, 27 October 2020
- Journal editors who oversaw decisions in which Monsanto manipulated the peer review process did not disclose their conflicts of interest. Scientific misconduct1 KB (116 words) - 16:52, 2 December 2021
- Methodology Research Records Authorship Open data Publication Acknowledgement Peer Review Conflict of Interest Public Communication Whistleblowing Responding to1 KB (107 words) - 12:25, 6 May 2020
- How to make the digital scholarly monograph fit for Open Access by applying smart services and toolsmonographs publishing. These are identification service, annotation service, peer-review certification system, metrics service and name entity recognition. ResearchersPhD790 bytes (56 words) - 13:16, 6 May 2021
- trainers Research integrity training for PhD students ORI 2002 United States Peer review Collaborative science Research involving animals Research misconduct Publication1 KB (108 words) - 14:05, 19 October 2020
- pressure to publish. It shows what can be achieved with post-publication peer-review. Furthermore, it shows what can go wrong when contributors who are responsible1 KB (105 words) - 20:07, 8 December 2020
- their real names in the past. The paper has gone through normal blind peer-review. It highlights that using pseudonyms affects the reliability of claims1,011 bytes (89 words) - 16:11, 18 June 2021
- storage and interpretation record-keeping Collaborative research Authorship Peer Review p Plagiarism Research Impact advocacy and dealing with media sharing SH1 KB (113 words) - 10:28, 11 August 2020
- a framework to support the integrity of the ARC’s grant application, peer review, grant selection and research evaluation processes, funding decisions2 KB (184 words) - 16:18, 21 October 2020
- misconduct Plagiarism Authorship Conflict of interest Publication ethics Peer review Copyright Collaborative research1 KB (102 words) - 14:57, 4 November 2020
- Replicability and replication in the humanities. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2019;4(2):1-12. Britt Holbrook J, Penders B, de Rijcke S. The humanities6 KB (726 words) - 14:19, 21 April 2021
- Honesty Accountability Responsibility Transparency Publication Ethics Peer review Authorship Questionable Authorship Practices Authorship and Contribution1 KB (160 words) - 14:53, 10 August 2020
- studentsSupervisors Whistleblower protection/rights Conflict of interest in peer review Standards of authorship Confidentiality Monitoring funding processes Research2 KB (180 words) - 12:26, 19 October 2021
- this category. Biased peer-review is a well-known example of the detrimental effects of personal relationships because the peer review system is based on10 KB (1,482 words) - 16:11, 15 October 2021
- institutionsResearch funding organisations Funders Conflict of interest in peer review Conflict of interests Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research2 KB (274 words) - 15:52, 1 December 2022
- t staffsupervresearchers Authorship criteria Conflict of interest in peer review Conflict of interests Data Practices and Management FAIR principles: sharing2 KB (280 words) - 15:48, 10 June 2022
- practice Falsification Fabrication Plagiarism Social responsibilities Peer review Authorship1 KB (154 words) - 16:21, 21 October 2020
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project)Publication Ethics Plagiarism Editorial review Complaints procedure Respect Peer Review Peer review Peer reviewing4 KB (408 words) - 15:22, 19 October 2021
- similarities. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review--Part 1. Lancet. 1996;347(9012):1382-6. Errami M, Sun Z, Long TC, George3 KB (420 words) - 11:45, 27 March 2021
- Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals (section Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals)this theme. Latest contribution was Oct 28, 2020 Conflict of interest in peer review Conflict of interests Honesty Conflict of interest Funders’ responsibilities3 KB (428 words) - 17:15, 28 October 2020