Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- The Case of the Missing Artefact + (Honesty)
- "Hot" Gifts + (Respect)
- The Case of Falsified Data + (Accountability)
- Possible Conflict of Interest + (Respect)
- The Suspect Questionnaire + (Honesty)
- The Hazardous Consent Forms + (Honesty)
- The Case of the Egyptian Travel Agent + (Respect)
- What's in That Bottle? What's in That Pipe? + (Respect)
- The Case of the Damaged Baby + (Honesty)
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism" + (Honesty)
- Backstage Maneuvers + (Honesty)
- Power to the People + (Accountability)
- Ethical Dilemmas and Moral Responsibilities + (Respect)
- Slow Code + (Accountability)
- Site Unseen + (Honesty)
- The Runaway Wife + (Respect)
- A Letter of "Non-Recommendation" + (Respect)
- When is Advanced Training Necessary? + (Respect)
- Would You Do a Post Doc with this Guy? + (Respect)
- 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Accountability)
- SSH research as part of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research + (Respect)
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers +
- Authors couldn’t find a patient to give consent for case report. Then the patient found the report. +
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports +
- Consent for publication (Participant) + (Respect)
- Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies + (Honesty)
- Journal calls 2012 paper “deeply offensive to particular minorities” + (Respect)
- A Letter of Resignation + (Respect)
- Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) + (Transparency)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) + (Transparency)
- Open access Publication in the European Research Area for Social Sciences and Humanities (OPERAS) + (Transparency)
- Open access publishing: the new norm? + (Transparency)
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature + (Transparency)
- Communicate results to the general public before a peer reviewed publication is available + (Transparency)
- Funding (Sponsorship) bias + (Transparency)
- Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing) + (Transparency)
- Inaccurate representation of results in the media + (Transparency)
- Inferring from P-values + (Transparency)
- Insufficiently reported study flaws and limitations + (Transparency)
- Publication bias (positive results) + (Transparency)
- Be grossly unfair to your collaborators + (Transparency)
- Fake peer-reviewing + (Transparency)
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship + (Transparency)
- Research collaboration + (Transparency)
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports + (Transparency)
- Ignoring substantial safety risks of the study to participants, workers or environment + (Transparency)
- Preregistration of animal study protocols + (Transparency)
- Statistical pre-registration + (Transparency)
- Digital humanities + (Transparency)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity + (Transparency)
- Legal rights of accused scientists + (Transparency)
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI + (Transparency)
- Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies + (Transparency)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data + (Transparency)
- The Dilemma Game + (Transparency)
- Empathy in History Research and Education + (Transparency)