Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship (section Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship)writing, technical and language editing, and proofreading. Contributors may be acknowledged individually or as a group, and their contributions should be specified4 KB (415 words) - 10:44, 6 September 2021
- Rights to Authorship (section Rights to Authorship)on his own. The case study asks whether Martinez's contribution merits authorship. AuthorsGraduate and postgraduate studentsResearchersJournal publishers933 bytes (95 words) - 14:29, 23 April 2021
- quite challenging to identify authors’ contributions due to long authorship lists, inconsistencies in authorship credit practices, name ambiguities or because2 KB (331 words) - 14:35, 22 October 2021
- Salami publication (section Authorship and publication)criteria for and effects of salami publication are. Salami publication is a concept that is difficult to define, therefore making detection and prevention3 KB (373 words) - 11:43, 27 March 2021
- [‘honorary or gift authorship’] Demand or accept an authorship for which you don’t qualify [‘honorary or gift authorship’] Omit a contributor who deserves authorship3 KB (366 words) - 10:16, 28 October 2020
- Research metrics (section Authorship and publication)Bibliometrics, refers to the statistical analysis of published articles and journals and their citations. Analysis of research metrics can be at a journal level3 KB (433 words) - 17:27, 26 March 2021
- researchers with knowledge and expertise can have a personal or professional connection with the authors, especially in a small and niche research area. Another3 KB (439 words) - 17:41, 26 March 2021
- Nature, BMC and EMBO now publish peer review and editorial comments after a manuscript has been accepted for publishing, when both reviewers and authors agree3 KB (453 words) - 10:41, 28 October 2020
- the data and results in the light of present knowledge and trying to figure out the impact of results, the hypothesis usually gets abandoned and another4 KB (533 words) - 11:42, 27 March 2021
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports (section Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports)2021. www.allea.org 2. TP C. Authorship matrix: a rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific4 KB (448 words) - 17:32, 27 October 2021
- communication and partnerships, and also provides equal opportunity among team members. It honors and respects each member's individual and organizational4 KB (511 words) - 22:27, 28 May 2022
- participants, and a waste of resources. Getting negative results in a costly project and after a lot of hard work can be very demotivating, disappointing and can4 KB (558 words) - 11:33, 27 March 2021
- 2016 and 2017 were cited in 2018, divided by the number of scholarly items published in the journal in 2016 and 2017. Garfield E. The history and meaning4 KB (618 words) - 11:36, 8 February 2023
- reporting and collaboration. QRPs are estimated to occur far more frequently then serious misconduct, and therefore pose a threat to trust and truth in5 KB (632 words) - 14:42, 20 March 2022
- Iris Lechner, Elsa Amin, Lars Lambriks contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Mar 25, 2021 Guidelines Open About Education Open About Education3 KB (364 words) - 18:55, 25 March 2021
- H-index (section Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes)self-citations in response to promotion policy Honorary authorship (putting a distinguished researcher on an authorship list often increases citation) Publishing on2 KB (288 words) - 17:41, 20 October 2020
- peer-reviewers’ and editors’ time, research funds, and collaborators’ efforts. Being biased in reporting results distorts the integrity of science and if not discovered4 KB (551 words) - 11:36, 27 March 2021
- permission and consent for acknowledging persons and for the wording of the acknowledgement. Bjørn Hofmann contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was1,009 bytes (86 words) - 22:25, 14 November 2021
- Scholarly Publishing” and “Core Practices” consist of guidelines and tools to assist editors, publishers and other stakeholders to “preserve and promote the integrity3 KB (278 words) - 16:46, 25 March 2021
- case of authorship, these values might be gratitude (for a – albeit small - contribution) versus righteousness (acting in line with the authorship guidelines)5 KB (834 words) - 16:07, 25 March 2021