Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- An author realized a paper had plagiarized his thesis. It took the journal four years to retract it. + (Cases)
- Chemistry professor faces criminal charges after researcher's death + (Cases)
- Researcher discovers paper published by co-author in another journal + (Cases)
- U.S. gov’t researchers withdraw climate paper after using pseudonyms + (Cases)
- Unhelpful retraction notice about a study that received favourable media attention + (Cases)
- What happens when an ex-physicist writes about gender identity? + (Cases)
- Protecting Research Subjects + (Cases)
- Disclosing Research Findings + (Cases)
- Fourth retraction for neuroscientist sentenced for fraud + (Cases)
- A 24-year-old sociology paper found to have plagiarised a 1975 article + (Cases)
- Data Handling and Record Keeping + (Cases)
- Selection bias in skull measurements + (Cases)
- The publication of controversial views + (Cases)
- Maintaining Competence + (Cases)
- Journalist who fabricated his reports + (Cases)
- Veterinary scientist fabricates data and manipulates images + (Cases)
- The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers + (Cases)
- Outsourcing animal experimentation + (Cases)
- Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing + (Cases)
- Postdoc randomly chose data during figure assembly + (Cases)
- Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects + (Cases)
- Research published by Hans Eysenck is unsafe + (Cases)
- Multiple submission + (Cases)
- Premature release of clinical trials data + (Cases)
- Duty to Report Ethical Violations of Others + (Cases)
- Nutrition researcher selling supplements + (Cases)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication + (Cases)
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics + (Cases)
- Publishing complications and patient safety + (Cases)
- Reproducibility of methodology + (Cases)
- Self-plagiarism and suspected salami publishing + (Cases)
- Research Reproducibility + (Cases)
- Misuse of grant money for personal purposes + (Cases)
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values + (Cases)
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values + (Cases)
- Show Me The Money! + (Cases)
- Eager Researcher Signs Away Intellectual Rights Despite University Refusal + (Cases)
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study + (Cases)
- Obstructive sleep apnoea + (Cases)
- Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: GM potatoes + (Cases)
- Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: Extasy + (Cases)
- It’s Still Plagiarism + (Cases)
- Psychologist made up sex bias results + (Cases)
- Ethics and children's rights: learning from past mistakes + (Cases)
- Climategate' scientist speaks out + (Cases)
- Who will mentor the mentors? + (Cases)
- What my retraction taught me + (Cases)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section + (Cases)
- Copy and paste: A slow university investigation into serious accusations of misconduct benefits no one + (Cases)
- Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: Issues for students and supervisors + (Cases)
- Former Hwang colleague faked monkey data + (Cases)
- Neurogenetics study was unethical says NNI report + (Cases)
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis + (Cases)
- The Ghost Collaborator + (Cases)
- Research misconduct in a grant application for the National Institutes of Health + (Cases)
- VIRT2UE train-the-trainer program + (Education)
- Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education. + (Education)
- What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing? + (Education)
- What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct? + (Education)
- What to communicate in retraction notices? + (Education)
- Writing usable qualitative health research findings + (Education)
- The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union + (Guidelines)
- The European Union Good Clinical Practice Directive + (Guidelines)
- The European Union Clinical Trials Directive + (Guidelines)
- 10 Things for Curating Reproducible and FAIR Research + (Guidelines)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Guidelines)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Guidelines)
- UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science + (Guidelines)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2023 Edition (ALLEA Code) + (Guidelines)
- The Finnish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and Procedures for Handling Alleged Violations of Research Integrity in Finland + (Guidelines)
- CIOMS International guidelines on good governance practice for research institutions + (Guidelines)
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations + (Guidelines)
- ROSiE Field-Specific Guidelines on Responsible Open Science + (Guidelines)
- ROSiE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science + (Guidelines)
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal + (Guidelines)
- Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector + (Guidelines)
- The Middle Position + (Interactive)
- Norms of the ECoC + (Interactive)
- Acting with Research Integrity + (Interactive)
- Debate vs Dialogue + (Interactive)
- Find the inappropriate duplications in biomedical images + (Interactive)
- Find the inappropriate duplications in biomedical images 2 + (Interactive)
- Helsinki Declaration - highlight the obligation + (Interactive)
- Find the inappropriate duplications in biomedical images 3 + (Interactive)
- Case: Apply the Emanuel Framework + (Interactive)
- Find the inappropriate duplications in biomedical images 4 + (Interactive)
- Philosophical Justifications for Human Subjects Research + (Interactive)
- Scenario #1 + (Interactive)
- Scenario #2 + (Interactive)
- Scenario #3 + (Interactive)
- Scenario #4 + (Interactive)
- Diner Pensant: Reflection + (Interactive)
- PREPARED Kick-Off Webinar + (Interactive)
- PREPARED Paris Meeting Webinar + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Test: Conflict of interests + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Test Ethical and societal foundations of open science + (Interactive)
- Case study: : Low-resourced research environments as a barrier to openness + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Test: Ethical aspects of citizen science + (Interactive)
- Prevention of research misconduct in open science + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Case Study: Prevention of research misconduct in open science + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Test: Protection of research participants rights in open science + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Test: Protection of research participants rights in open science + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Test: Ethical and societal foundations of open science + (Interactive)
- Protection of research participants (test) + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Test: Ethical aspects of citizen science + (Interactive)
- Ethical and societal foundations of open science - Case Study + (Interactive)
- Protection of Research Participants - Case Study + (Interactive)
- Rights of Citizen Scientists - Case Study + (Interactive)
- Quality of research outputs and data sets -- Case study + (Interactive)
- Conflicts of interest in citizen science - case study + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Test: Quality of data + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Case Study: Quality of research outputs and data sets + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Test: Risks to environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems + (Interactive)
- ROSiE Case Study: Risks to environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems + (Interactive)
- The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) + (Other)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity + (Other)
- Research Ethics + (Other)
- Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it + (Other)
- Institutional dealing with scientific misconduct + (Other)
- Research Integrity Practices in Science Europe Member Organizations + (Other)
- Research Integrity - Detecting and determining greyscales + (Other)
- The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern Science + (Other)
- Cochrane library + (Other)
- Think. Check. Submit. + (Other)
- Transpose + (Other)
- The qualification portfolio (UMC Utrecht): from output to impact + (Other)
- ALLEA Permanent Working Group Science and Ethics + (Other)
- Practical tools and strategies for researchers to increase replicability + (Other)
- DOAB + (Other)
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct + (Other)
- Humanities in the European Research Area (HERA) + (Other)
- Avoiding bias in qualitative data analysis + (Other)
- Data Privacy & Security Global Coronavirus Toolkit + (Other)
- Eigenfactorizer + (Other)
- Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings + (Other)
- How to make the digital scholarly monograph fit for Open Access by applying smart services and tools + (Other)
- OAPEN OA Books Toolkit + (Other)
- Your preprint pre-posting checklist + (Other)
- Tools of the interdisciplinary trade: how to make your interdisciplinary project a success + (Other)
- Infographic - SOPs4RI Guidelines on Responsible Supervision and Leadership + (Other)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Scenarios)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Scenarios)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Scenarios)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Scenarios)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Scenarios)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Scenarios)
- Research Integrity in trying times: a scenario on the presentation and dissemination of information + (Scenarios)
- Using data not created for research purposes in the context of collaboration with private companies + (Scenarios)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Scenarios)
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism + (Scenarios)
- Authorship Deserved, Not Earned: Research Ethics and Research Integrity Scenario + (Scenarios)
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample + (Scenarios)
- Unwritten expectations in doctoral training: research integrity scenario + (Scenarios)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Scenarios)