Pages that link to "File:Icon-discussions.svg"
From The Embassy of Good Science
The following pages link to File:Icon-discussions.svg:
Displayed 50 items.
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)- 3 Ways to Blow the Whistle (file link) (← links)
- Research Integrity: Sabotage! (file link) (← links)
- Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science (file link) (← links)
- Sitting in Judgement (file link) (← links)
- Reflections on the Cleveland Clinic Study of The Batista Operation (file link) (← links)
- HEIRRI courses (file link) (← links)
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 (file link) (← links)
- Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study (file link) (← links)
- A comparison of online versus on-site training in health research methodology: a randomized study (file link) (← links)
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making (file link) (← links)
- University of Montana online research ethics course (file link) (← links)
- Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans (file link) (← links)
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. (file link) (← links)
- The Nuremberg Code (file link) (← links)
- Protecting research subjects (file link) (← links)
- Research culture (file link) (← links)
- Networks and projects promoting research integrity (file link) (← links)
- LIRIcs - Leuven Institutional Research Integrity culture and self-reflection on-line course (file link) (← links)
- Image Integrity (file link) (← links)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (file link) (← links)
- Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training (file link) (← links)
- Teacher guidelines in early bioethical education (file link) (← links)
- The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) (file link) (← links)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (file link) (← links)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (file link) (← links)
- Netherlands Position Paper on the Recognition and Rewards of Academics (file link) (← links)
- Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics (file link) (← links)
- Netherlands Standard Evaluation Protocol for Research Assessments (file link) (← links)
- Sample records for guideline development processes (file link) (← links)
- The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern Science (file link) (← links)
- Research Integrity lunch meetings (file link) (← links)
- Psychology of misbehavior (in Dutch) (file link) (← links)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland (file link) (← links)
- The ConScience App - theatre play (file link) (← links)
- The learning curve - theatre play #MeTooAcademia (file link) (← links)
- Research Integrity champions (file link) (← links)
- Cochrane library (file link) (← links)
- PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven) (file link) (← links)
- Think. Check. Submit. (file link) (← links)
- Transpose (file link) (← links)
- "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry) (file link) (← links)
- The qualification portfolio (UMC Utrecht): from output to impact (file link) (← links)
- Casuistry – is this RM, QRP or RCR? Three cases with dilemmas (file link) (← links)
- Superb Supervision: integrity training for supervisors (file link) (← links)
- KU Leuven - Supervisor tips to promote research integrity (file link) (← links)
- Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review (file link) (← links)
- A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data (file link) (← links)
- Governance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe (file link) (← links)
- Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity (file link) (← links)
- Industry funded research (file link) (← links)