Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- ing-a-data-repository.aspx. DataCite Blog. 2,000 Data Repositories and Science Europe’s Framework for Discipline-specific Research Data Manamegent. 20184 KB (562 words) - 09:59, 19 October 2021
- Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy. 2017;46(4):868-79. Petersen AM, Riccaboni M, Stanley HE, Pammolli F. Persistence4 KB (524 words) - 13:00, 14 June 2022
- promotion policy. 2018; Available at: https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/italian-scientists-increase-self-citations-in-response-to-promotion-policy. Accessed2 KB (288 words) - 17:41, 20 October 2020
- Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct (section Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct)threatens the integrity of public science and the public's trust in science. Academic institutionsResearch funding organisationsPolicy-makers Monsanto LS 09.051 KB (116 words) - 16:52, 2 December 2021
- related to research culture and research integrity. For instance, what is the policy on mentioning co-authors? Or on assessing the work of your competitors?2 KB (244 words) - 14:25, 22 October 2021
- The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct (section The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct)appeals Research misconduct Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct The Swiss National Science Foundation 2016 Switzerland Plagiarism1 KB (149 words) - 11:15, 19 October 2021
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine (section The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine)against the case of the AAP's (American Academy of Paediatrics) change of policy's position in relation to infant male circumcision. The author of the blog897 bytes (77 words) - 12:56, 6 July 2021
- employer, the University of Notre Dame (UND). The UND Research Integrity Policy, like that of virtually all U.S. universities, is mandated by ORI. It requires2 KB (184 words) - 16:11, 26 October 2020
- Institutional dealing with scientific misconduct (section Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science)Researchers Other Open About Cases Open About Cases Open About Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct Research misconduct ALLEA Pieter726 bytes (42 words) - 17:07, 23 June 2021
- protection and management. Among others, the charter focuses on protection policies, legislation and economy, surveys, investigation, maintenance and conservation2 KB (181 words) - 11:10, 30 June 2021
- Resources Education These Principles and guidelines are intended mainly for policy makers responsible for the development of the school history curriculum2 KB (177 words) - 16:06, 20 April 2021
- 2019 European Science Foundation, All European Academies. The European code of conduct for research integrity. Revised edition: European Science Foundation;6 KB (704 words) - 11:49, 27 March 2021
- works in contemporary science. Thus, the case might shed light on the often neglected benefits of “the social control of science”. Researchers Education2 KB (163 words) - 19:17, 25 October 2020
- AttorneysDecision makersGeneral publicPolicy makers Archaeologist Respect Accountability Collaborative research SH - Social Sciences and Humanities676 bytes (55 words) - 23:29, 3 May 2021
- research practices and outcomes of the highest status, by encouraging good science and preventing misconduct among all stakeholders involved in the UK research2 KB (198 words) - 10:32, 27 July 2021
- guideline development processes. Policy makers Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity WorldWideScience.org445 bytes (33 words) - 16:49, 23 August 2020
- Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science (section Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science)0189311. PhD studentsPostdocs One example of adaption of open peer review policies in seen in BMC series journals. BMC begun with open peer review in 19993 KB (439 words) - 14:07, 22 October 2021
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland (section Serious Accusation of Negligence of Ethical Principles in Human Sciences)disqualification; Serious accusation of negligence of ethical principles in human sciences; Authorship dispute; The investigation of alleged plagiarism in a doctoral4 KB (441 words) - 16:34, 21 October 2020
- Delusory Parasitosis, the accusations of fabrication may not hold, and bad science would be a better description of the problem at hand. Accordingly, the validity2 KB (185 words) - 19:23, 25 October 2020
- Falsification Fabrication Fairness SH - Social Sciences and Humanities PE - Physical Sciences and Engineering LS - Life Sciences2 KB (186 words) - 12:33, 29 June 2021
- misconducts. Based on these recommendations, universities should create defined policies and standards, develop codes of conduct and guarantee training, among others865 bytes (77 words) - 14:12, 30 October 2020
- Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct German Research Foundation (DFG) Commission on Professional Self-Regulation in Science 2019 Germany2 KB (180 words) - 12:26, 19 October 2021
- IndustryPolicy-makersRegulatorsResearch institutions MedTech Europe 2015 Transparency Safety Quality LS - Life Sciences PE - Physical Sciences and Engineering1 KB (162 words) - 12:39, 30 June 2021
- -Biological sciences -Health sciences -Chemistry and Chemical biology -Earth, Environmental and Space sciences -Physics -Material science -Social sciences -Generalist5 KB (626 words) - 10:00, 19 October 2021
- special role in science, as they ultimately determine what gets published in their journals. We often say that editors are gate-keepers of science, because of4 KB (479 words) - 17:32, 13 October 2020
- aimed at fostering good research practice and building public trust in science. These initiatives take various forms, such as codes, guidelines, recommendations3 KB (431 words) - 15:20, 22 October 2021
- Guidelines Open About EUREC ENRIO SIENNA SH - Social Sciences and Humanities SH 02.11 - Social studies of science and technology LS 02 - Genetics, Genomics, Bioinformatics2 KB (293 words) - 15:36, 22 October 2021
- existing projects, contributing to post-2020 European strategic funding policy and promoting responsible research engagements. Ultimately, this initiative1 KB (130 words) - 17:41, 15 April 2024
- Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities (section Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities)About Cases Open About Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science Peer review Post-publication peer review Michael Ochsner Nina Kancewicz-Hoffman8 KB (1,185 words) - 20:40, 13 March 2023
- Research -Child Protection Policy and Code of Conduct. Research institutionsResearch Integrity OfficersResearchers Guidelines Open About Commissione per l'Etica1 KB (145 words) - 12:14, 1 March 2022
- situations in which research integrity is at stake: What happened at LONA Science Centre Hannah's story The learning cards can not only be used in classroom7 KB (752 words) - 10:52, 8 April 2021
- Informed consent Consent SH - Social Sciences and Humanities LS 07.09 - Public health and epidemiology SH 02.02 - Social policies, work and welfare1 KB (118 words) - 15:33, 4 November 2021
- psychological research in Europe. Via their code of conduct, the EASP outlines the policies that apply to those participating in EASP activities, particularly with898 bytes (88 words) - 21:52, 27 October 2020
- training guidance notes. TeachersPrincipalsPolicy makersResearchers CCEA 2019 Northern Ireland SH - Social Sciences and Humanities709 bytes (63 words) - 14:34, 16 April 2021
- Improper data use (a bias distorting research results) (section Is there a reproducibility crisis in science?)results to become misleading. Improper data use undermines the ethos of science and the corresponding misleading results can misguide and distort the production4 KB (549 words) - 21:44, 1 February 2021
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. (section Collaborative science)publication practices and responsible authorship; peer review; collaborative science; research on humans; research on laboratory animals; research misconduct;2 KB (215 words) - 11:11, 28 October 2020
- collaborative and satisfied with the study. The participants also provided societal policy recommendations with regard to surrogate consent. Researchers De Vries Stanczyk880 bytes (75 words) - 14:04, 29 October 2020
- designed to be cross-disciplinary, and not limited to a particular field of science, engineering or medicine. It aims to cover all fields in research and development2 KB (237 words) - 16:50, 12 July 2021
- researchers with new tools. Researchers Radboud University Nijmegen – Insitut for Science, Innovation and Society 2018 Netherlands Honesty RERI in general Plagiarism733 bytes (77 words) - 16:08, 10 November 2020
- role model or leading on initiatives to promote research integrity, open science, recognition for varied contributions to research and fair approaches to1 KB (207 words) - 15:30, 22 October 2021
- researchersCivil society organisationsEthics committee membersPatientsPhysiciansPolicy-makers Active Citizenship Network (ACN) 2002 Privacy Confidentiality Respect1 KB (136 words) - 11:57, 30 June 2021
- Plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification are major threats to the practice of science. Without research integrity officers, this threat would loom much larger4 KB (606 words) - 15:11, 22 October 2021
- questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling." Psychological science 23.5 (2012): 524-532. The most important characteristic of a dilemma is7 KB (710 words) - 09:58, 28 September 2021
- Dialysis and Transplant Association. All stakeholders in researchDecision makersPolicy makersCivil society organisationsEthics committee membersAttorneysHuman2 KB (158 words) - 10:14, 27 July 2021
- implementation of the requirements and criteria into an organization’s policies. Researchers Science Europe 2019 EU Data management901 bytes (82 words) - 10:11, 13 November 2020
- addition, the study describes some strengths and weaknesses of anonymization policies. The four central questions the researchers pose in the study are: "What1 KB (145 words) - 13:51, 14 October 2020
- https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/psychological_science/preregistration ResearchersPolicy makersJournal editors The most relevant examples are studies7 KB (970 words) - 22:10, 24 October 2020
- sourceHistory Find out Themes Plan S is an initiative for open-access publishing in science. It was set in motion by research organizations from 12 different European3 KB (424 words) - 15:15, 22 October 2021
- constitutions, comparative law, human rights SH 02.11 - Social studies of science and technology PE 06.07 - Artificial intelligence, intelligent systems,2 KB (231 words) - 15:45, 10 April 2024
- Research institutionsresearch leadersPolicy makersProfessors See also: http://www.nature.com/news/fewer-numbers-better-science-1.20858 Other Open About Other2 KB (184 words) - 12:49, 1 September 2020
- contributed to this publication. TeachersPrincipalsPolicy makersResearchers EuroClio SH - Social Sciences and Humanities SH 06.06 - Modern and contemporary952 bytes (95 words) - 15:06, 16 April 2021
- the important role and influence of research regulators who, along with policy makers, should collaborate with researchers, patients and health professionals4 KB (505 words) - 15:26, 22 October 2021
- appropriate use as well as its misuse. Addressing any question in empirical sciences implies that there will be some kind of study, which needs to be designed3 KB (397 words) - 17:56, 26 March 2021
- out Resources Cases This is the 2017 annual report for the Swiss National Science Foundation's Commission on Scientific Integrity and Plagiarism Control Group3 KB (316 words) - 16:33, 21 October 2020
- /data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020_ethics-soc-science-humanities_en.pdf. ResearchersEducatorsUniversitiesPolicy makers VIGOR (Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes4 KB (566 words) - 14:20, 2 September 2021
- examples of ‘sloppy science’. Since these ‘sloppy’ practices are much more frequent, they are arguably more detrimental to science than research misconduct7 KB (883 words) - 11:03, 28 October 2020
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE projectreview - transparent way of gatekeeping science Peer review Plagiarism Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies (PREP) Publishers - COPE guidelines Fairness4 KB (422 words) - 15:23, 19 October 2021
- membersResearch Ethics Committees ENERI has recently published an insightful policy brief on what makes a research ethics and research integrity expert. Based4 KB (541 words) - 15:05, 22 October 2021
- Nature on their editorial policies page (available here, accessed on 24-04-2020). The Center for Ethics and Values in the Sciences, of the University of Alabama5 KB (657 words) - 14:36, 22 October 2021
- Detection. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016;22(1):189-97. Peer review process is vital to science, as it provides quality assurance before publication of new knowledge. Any3 KB (439 words) - 17:41, 26 March 2021
- units on: Conflict of interest Data protection Social responsibility Open science Mentoring for stronger cultures of integrity. The topic developing infrastructures5 KB (674 words) - 11:37, 17 July 2023
- Programmes in Science -Frequently asked questions. Wellcome Trust. Accessed via: https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/four-year-phd-programmes-science-faqs-2019-017 KB (942 words) - 16:28, 25 March 2021
- education or research. University of Split Faculty of Humanities and Social science. December 2019. [cited 2020 Nov 16]. Available from: http://inet1.ffst.8 KB (1,090 words) - 14:54, 22 October 2021
- sourceHistory Find out Resources Scenarios Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of eight scenarios for educational purposes and to4 KB (432 words) - 15:23, 19 October 2021
- sourceHistory Find out Resources Scenarios Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of eight scenarios for educational purposes and to5 KB (466 words) - 15:21, 19 October 2021
- sourceHistory Find out Resources Scenarios Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of eight scenarios for educational purposes and to4 KB (408 words) - 15:22, 19 October 2021
- (under development) Publication as public knowledge (under development) Open science or restricted access (under development) Stakeholder consultations (under7 KB (900 words) - 13:29, 13 October 2021
- wrong in this situation? ResearchersStudentsResearch institutionsEducatorsPolicy makers In the late 1990s, a large cross-national survey was conducted with7 KB (1,042 words) - 15:21, 8 June 2021