Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- Researchers Education Open About Authorship criteria Standards of authorship Respect Authorship and Contribution Proposal Authorship631 bytes (41 words) - 12:29, 6 April 2021
- argues for co-authorship. Early career researchersSupervisors Education Open About Authorship criteria Respect Authorship and Contribution Research methodology751 bytes (57 words) - 12:22, 6 April 2021
- Technology OREI 2018 Australia Peer review Conflict of Interest Authorship Authorship and Contribution Public Communication937 bytes (88 words) - 15:57, 6 August 2020
- project. Researchers Education Open About Authorship criteria Respect Honesty Authorship and Contribution Authorship dispute LS 02.11 - Computational biology729 bytes (54 words) - 12:17, 6 April 2021
- student and takes credit for a manuscript prepared by the deceased. Junior researchersSupervisors Inappropriate authorship Respect Honesty Authorship and Contribution772 bytes (50 words) - 11:19, 6 April 2021
- colleagues and be patient. Researchers Standards of authorship Ahmad Bilal Albert Jambon 2015 Syria France Respect Authorship and Contribution Authorship dispute890 bytes (75 words) - 12:50, 6 April 2021
- Transparency Publication Ethics Peer review Authorship Questionable Authorship Practices Authorship and Contribution1 KB (160 words) - 14:53, 10 August 2020
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations (section Authorship and publication)ICMJE 2018 Reliability Transparency Accountability Honesty Authorship Authorship and Contribution2 KB (150 words) - 11:33, 28 October 2020
- Authorship Deserved, Not Earned: Research Ethics and Research Integrity Scenario (section Authorship Deserved, Not Earned: Research Ethics and Research Integrity Scenario)recommendations Authorship criteria Fairness Morality transparency Professionalism RE in general Authorship and Contribution Authorship assignement Authorship dispute2 KB (230 words) - 12:22, 21 February 2022
- Accountability Authorship Authorship and Contribution3 KB (359 words) - 17:54, 26 March 2021
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 (section Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3)Fairness Authorship Peer Review Ghost authorship Authorship and Contribution Collaborative research Honorary authorship Questionable Authorship Practices3 KB (348 words) - 11:49, 7 September 2020
- questionable research practices Collaborative research Data Management Authorship and Contribution Good Practice Plagiarism RCR5 KB (598 words) - 11:36, 7 April 2022
- Honorary authorship and gift authorship are two types of authorship frauds in research. Both honorary and gift authorship refers to assigning authorship to those6 KB (738 words) - 13:40, 7 October 2021
- why authorship standards matter: “Correct authorship of research publications matters because authorship confers credit, carries responsibility, and readers4 KB (465 words) - 16:47, 25 March 2021
- include honorary authorship, gift authorship, prestige authorship, plagiarism, self-plagiarism, citation amnesia, multiple submissions and duplicate publication8 KB (1,039 words) - 18:49, 25 March 2021
- contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Oct 20, 2020 Education Open About About Cases Open About Standards of authorship Conflict of interest in peer6 KB (656 words) - 17:07, 20 October 2020
- to this theme. Latest contribution was Sep 28, 2021 Cases Open About Cognitive dissonance and moral distress Moral conflict and moral dilemma 04 - Moral7 KB (710 words) - 09:58, 28 September 2021
- importance and social benefits of Open Science in local and global contexts. Participation in ethics and integrity self-regulation of Open Science and citizen11 KB (1,345 words) - 15:15, 18 April 2024
- AI Generated Content (section Successful and timely uptake of artificial intelligence in science in the EU)accommodate these changes. This is a developing issue, and raises questions about attribution and authorship for which there are not yet clear answers. Nature4 KB (529 words) - 17:20, 17 April 2024
- SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review (section SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review)academic paper and has a central focus on authorship and peer review. Topics discussed are: making a publication plan, determining authorship order, recognising6 KB (780 words) - 16:41, 21 September 2022
- Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship (section Not acknowledging contributors who do not qualify for authorship)writing, technical and language editing, and proofreading. Contributors may be acknowledged individually or as a group, and their contributions should be specified4 KB (415 words) - 10:44, 6 September 2021
- Rights to Authorship (section Rights to Authorship)on his own. The case study asks whether Martinez's contribution merits authorship. AuthorsGraduate and postgraduate studentsResearchersJournal publishers933 bytes (95 words) - 14:29, 23 April 2021
- quite challenging to identify authors’ contributions due to long authorship lists, inconsistencies in authorship credit practices, name ambiguities or because2 KB (331 words) - 14:35, 22 October 2021
- Salami publication (section Authorship and publication)criteria for and effects of salami publication are. Salami publication is a concept that is difficult to define, therefore making detection and prevention3 KB (373 words) - 11:43, 27 March 2021
- [‘honorary or gift authorship’] Demand or accept an authorship for which you don’t qualify [‘honorary or gift authorship’] Omit a contributor who deserves authorship3 KB (366 words) - 10:16, 28 October 2020
- Research metrics (section Authorship and publication)Bibliometrics, refers to the statistical analysis of published articles and journals and their citations. Analysis of research metrics can be at a journal level3 KB (433 words) - 17:27, 26 March 2021
- researchers with knowledge and expertise can have a personal or professional connection with the authors, especially in a small and niche research area. Another3 KB (439 words) - 17:41, 26 March 2021
- Nature, BMC and EMBO now publish peer review and editorial comments after a manuscript has been accepted for publishing, when both reviewers and authors agree3 KB (453 words) - 10:41, 28 October 2020
- the data and results in the light of present knowledge and trying to figure out the impact of results, the hypothesis usually gets abandoned and another4 KB (533 words) - 11:42, 27 March 2021
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports (section Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports)2021. www.allea.org 2. TP C. Authorship matrix: a rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific4 KB (448 words) - 17:32, 27 October 2021
- communication and partnerships, and also provides equal opportunity among team members. It honors and respects each member's individual and organizational4 KB (511 words) - 22:27, 28 May 2022
- participants, and a waste of resources. Getting negative results in a costly project and after a lot of hard work can be very demotivating, disappointing and can4 KB (558 words) - 11:33, 27 March 2021
- 2016 and 2017 were cited in 2018, divided by the number of scholarly items published in the journal in 2016 and 2017. Garfield E. The history and meaning4 KB (618 words) - 11:36, 8 February 2023
- reporting and collaboration. QRPs are estimated to occur far more frequently then serious misconduct, and therefore pose a threat to trust and truth in5 KB (632 words) - 14:42, 20 March 2022
- Iris Lechner, Elsa Amin, Lars Lambriks contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Mar 25, 2021 Guidelines Open About Education Open About Education3 KB (364 words) - 18:55, 25 March 2021
- H-index (section Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes)self-citations in response to promotion policy Honorary authorship (putting a distinguished researcher on an authorship list often increases citation) Publishing on2 KB (288 words) - 17:41, 20 October 2020
- peer-reviewers’ and editors’ time, research funds, and collaborators’ efforts. Being biased in reporting results distorts the integrity of science and if not discovered4 KB (551 words) - 11:36, 27 March 2021
- permission and consent for acknowledging persons and for the wording of the acknowledgement. Bjørn Hofmann contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was1,009 bytes (86 words) - 22:25, 14 November 2021
- Scholarly Publishing” and “Core Practices” consist of guidelines and tools to assist editors, publishers and other stakeholders to “preserve and promote the integrity3 KB (278 words) - 16:46, 25 March 2021
- case of authorship, these values might be gratitude (for a – albeit small - contribution) versus righteousness (acting in line with the authorship guidelines)5 KB (834 words) - 16:07, 25 March 2021
- an agreement at the outset, and later as needed, as to how the outcomes of the research, research data and authorship and publication responsibilities5 KB (647 words) - 17:31, 27 October 2021
- Responsible mentoring (section Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project)of motivation and poor collaboration, and laps in professionalism, failure to acknowledge mentee’s contribution, lack of commitment and collaboration.6 KB (867 words) - 12:01, 20 September 2021
- editorsPublishersResearchers Institutions and journals need to have clear guidelines on publication and authorship in place. Guidelines should involve a section3 KB (359 words) - 10:48, 28 October 2020
- contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Oct 23, 2020 Education Open About Education Open About Standards of authorship Questionable research practices3 KB (343 words) - 12:04, 23 October 2020
- games, RCR and RI can be taught and help develop responsible researchers. To be a good researcher, it is not enough just to know rules and codes of conduct3 KB (383 words) - 14:23, 22 October 2021
- approve the manuscript and give their consent for submission and publication. Disregarding this principle can lead to some legal issues and in some cases to6 KB (807 words) - 15:19, 27 May 2021
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective (section Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective)if they have not contributed to a paper (or if their contribution does not constitute authorship). Usually, discussions on COIs in the research integrity10 KB (1,482 words) - 16:11, 15 October 2021
- carefully and comprehensively report their experimental design, materials and techniques used, and all of their outcomes. Here, reproducibility and transparency5 KB (613 words) - 23:29, 27 October 2020
- integrity and research ethics. As an interactive tool and addition to education, the Rotterdam dilemma game can be used as an exercise for considering and dealing5 KB (687 words) - 10:33, 9 March 2023
- management from the start of the project, to an open and timely conversation about (co-) authorship. On the other hand, responsible supervision involves5 KB (650 words) - 14:00, 22 October 2021