Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

The Reward Alliance + (This website contains documents, information and resources on how to increase the value of research and reduce waste. It is based on articles published in the medical journal The Lancet in 2014.)
FOSTER project workshop + (This workshop discusses how to deal with i … This workshop discusses how to deal with issues with regard to research integrity, addressing good and bad research practices. Some of the covered topics where: What is exactly research integrity? What are the risks? How to detect research misconduct? With what resources can researchers react to respond to topics related to research integrity? How should researchers act when research integrity is endangered? The planned learning outcome is to raise awareness on responsible conduct of research among PhD students and help them recognize and apply it in their research and in the research of others.ir research and in the research of others.)
Casuistry – is this RM, QRP or RCR? Three cases with dilemmas + (Three cases are presented. Are these cases … Three cases are presented. Are these cases Research Misconduct, Questionable Research Practices or Responsible Conduct of Research? Participants are asked for their normative judgement, after which a discussion takes place. At the end of the case, it is explained what was decided in the real case.The moderator asks the participants not only to make their normative judgement, but also to think about why. Which norms and values are at stake? On which norms and values did you base your judgement? Which values are in conflict and which are more important to you?flict and which are more important to you?)
Dispute Over Primary Authorship + (Three researchers put forth an equal amount of effort on a research project resulting in a dispute over who the primary author should be.)
Circularity in Research and Innovation + (Through interactive exercises, learners ex … Through interactive exercises, learners explore the 9R strategies—Refuse, Rethink, Reduce, Reuse, Repair, Refurbish, Remanufacture, Repurpose, Recycle—and understand how these practices contribute to sustainability across product lifecycles. Participants reflect on the environmental, social, and economic impacts of circularity, developing systems thinking and adaptability skills. By the end of the module, learners will be able to integrate circular principles into research, innovation, and design processes, promoting resource efficiency, responsible consumption, and sustainable development. consumption, and sustainable development.)
Science policy + (Through the determination of funding and g … Through the determination of funding and goals of the scientific community, science policy influences core aspects of all sciences. Science policy defines direction for research activities through investments both in people and equipment. Science policies are usually developed by governmental bodies and/or other stakeholders with any kind of interests in science (e.g., theoretical, practical, financial).'"`UNIQ--ref-00000293-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--references-00000294-QINU`"'NU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-00000294-QINU`"')
The Danish Act on the Research Advisory System + (Through this act, the Danish government e … Through this act, the Danish government establishes the Danish Council for Research and Innovation Policy and the Danish Council for Independent Research, whose main aim is to promote research, collaboration and ensure high standards in Denmark. Whereas the Danish Council for Research and Innovation Policy shall promote research of high societal relevance with practical impact, the Danish Council for Independent Research shall provide support and advice on research initiated by independent researchers.arch initiated by independent researchers.)
TiGRE + (TiGRE (“Trust in Governance and Regulation … TiGRE (“Trust in Governance and Regulation in Europe”) is a Horizon 2020 research project that explores how trust is built, maintained, or lost in European regulatory systems. It focuses on three key sectors finance, food safety, and data protection across different levels of governance. The project brings together a multidisciplinary team of academics and practitioners to study interactions among regulators, firms, interest groups, courts, and citizens. Using a mixed-methods approach (surveys, experiments, case studies, focus groups, media analysis), TiGRE aims to uncover the drivers of trust, develop indicators of declining trust, and propose scenarios and policy recommendations to help institutions strengthen trust in regulation.stitutions strengthen trust in regulation.)
Interim Practice Work + (To acquire the skills needed to ‘pass the … To acquire the skills needed to ‘pass the expertise’ and train others, and to understand the aim, content and didactics of each exercises, trainees need to practice them. Therefore, between the first and the second face-to-face session trainees need to facilitate the 5 exercises that they have learned about and experienced during the first part of the face-to-face program ([https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:64cb2917-6ee4-44ca-ad3b-b998bc6786ea Self-Declaration Approach]; [https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:Ac206152-effd-475b-b8cd-7e5861cb65aa Debate and Dialogue]; [https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:747f4d61-3c97-4c4b-acd9-4d69c95f134b Virtues and Norms]; [https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:522ba3d0-9f26-41d5-9ecf-b4c88214887c The middle position]; and [https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:A0dd2e82-52e7-4030-a396-54525630e75c Dilemma game]).2e7-4030-a396-54525630e75c Dilemma game]).)
The University of Oslo's Guidelines on Handling Conflicts + (To maintain a secure and open and to foste … To maintain a secure and open and to foster integrity, conflicts should be prevented as much as possible. This guideline describes what constitutes conflicts, how they can be prevented, the procedure for reporting conflicts and how they are handled. It applies only to conflicts among employees; conflicts between employees and students are handled separately.oyees and students are handled separately.)
Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains + (Traditionally forensic anthropologists are … Traditionally forensic anthropologists are occupied with skeletal remains but more and more they are dealing with a different range of preservation of human bodies and body parts that take part in medico-legal processes. In addition, forensic anthropologists are involved in the identification, missing person cases, and individualization of mass disaster victims '"`UNIQ--ref-000001D8-QINU`"'. During their work, forensic anthropologists deal with different ethical issues that concern social, cultural, and political domains so ethical considerations can be applied to the profession and the individual '"`UNIQ--ref-000001D9-QINU`"'.'"`UNIQ--references-000001DA-QINU`"'U`"'. '"`UNIQ--references-000001DA-QINU`"')
Transpose + (Transpose (TRANsparency in Scholarly Publi … Transpose (TRANsparency in Scholarly Publishing for Open Scholarship Evolution) is an initiative to build a database of journal policies, focussing on open peer review, co-reviewing and detailed preprinting policies. The goal of this initiative is to foster new practices while increasing awareness among authors, editors, and other stakeholders, while providing resources to assist journals in setting, sharing, and clarifying their policies.g, sharing, and clarifying their policies.)
Prospective registration of clinical trials + (Trial registration is the publication of i … Trial registration is the publication of information about the design, conduct, and administration of clinical trials and should be registered before enrollment of the first participant. The information should be published on a publicly-accessible website at no charge, managed by a nonprofit organization, freely available to anybody and searchable electronically. Registration aims 1) to improve the transparency of these trials and 2) to protect stakeholder interests – including the interests of the subjects, the investigators, peer scientists and society in general.s, peer scientists and society in general.)
Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? + (Two authors wrote to an editorial committe … Two authors wrote to an editorial committee to ask whether they could publish a paper anonymously. The authors work in a general practice, producing research that showed the health-related problems arising from the practice switching one of its contracts from one laboratory to another. The authors did not want to be perceived as assigning blame to any single party. The committee declined to publish the paper anonymously. This is a factual anonymized case.mously. This is a factual anonymized case.)
Fabrication and falsification + (Two graduate students co-author an article … Two graduate students co-author an article. After submission, they receive a response from a referee with critical but valid comments on one section. One of the graduate students takes the lead in the revision. The other student recognizes that in the new version, the other student has changed some data, writing to the referee that they were mistakes. The graduate student is suspicious because there is no good explanation for the change of data. In addition, she knows the revising student is desperate to publish in a good journal before she starts her job search next year. However there is no concrete evidence of misconduct.ere is no concrete evidence of misconduct.)
Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review + (Two papers in an environmental journal were retracted following investigations on claims that the peer-review process had been compromised.)
Reaction to bias + (Two post-docs, a man and a woman, are both … Two post-docs, a man and a woman, are both working on new major proposals under the supervision of their professor. Only one of the proposals can be submitted. After much discussion, the professor selects the proposal of the female post-doc and invites the male post-doc to be co-PI with him. Being co-PI is major career opportunity. The question arises, why did the professor select the proposal of one post-doc (the female) and invite the other (the male) to be his co-PI?vite the other (the male) to be his co-PI?)
Long distance collaboration + (Two research groups are collaborating remo … Two research groups are collaborating remotely. One will provide the experimental results, the other will provide simulations. One of the scientists from the simulating group discovers the other group has overlooked some fundamental physics. She decides this needs to be published immediately, and overnight writes a paper to demonstrate this, including experiments from their collaborators. The scientist who writes the article makes himself the first author. He sends the draft to the collaborating group, who immediately respond angrily. They reject the idea that someone else could be first author with their experiments and they threaten to cancel the collaboration, retracting all funding.the collaboration, retracting all funding.)
UKRI Open Access Policy and Guide + (UK Research and Innovation’s open access p … UK Research and Innovation’s open access policy covers peer‑reviewed research articles and long‑form outputs (monographs, book chapters and edited collections) acknowledging UKRI funding. The policy mandates immediate open access for articles under permitted licences (typically CC BY) via compliant journals or repositories, and sets staged requirements and funding routes for long‑form publications. Supplementary guidance and FAQs clarify third‑party copyright, exceptions, and routes for compliance, while engagement materials explain implementation timelines and support for research organisations. The policy’s goal is to ensure that publicly funded research can be freely accessed, used and built upon, with clear signposting to acknowledge funding and manage rights. to acknowledge funding and manage rights.)
Unfair reviewing + (Unfair reviewing refers to a reviewer abus … Unfair reviewing refers to a reviewer abusing their position to promote their own interests or unreasonably disadvantage others. Unfair reviewing can occur during the process of peer review of journal manuscripts, grant applications or for colleagues applying for a promotion.r for colleagues applying for a promotion.)
A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct + (Upon acceptance of a manuscript prepared by a researcher, the editor-in-chief of the journal asked the researcher to add an article published in their journal to the reference list. The researcher agreed to the request.)
A Plagiarism Adventure (Et Plagieringseventyr) + (Using the theme of Charles Dickens' "Christmas Carol," this amusing Norwegian video with English subtitles presents consequences of plagiarism.)
Sertifika + (VIRT2UE eğitmen eğitimi programına kaydola … VIRT2UE eğitmen eğitimi programına kaydolan katılımcıların, sertifikalı eğitmen olma şansı vardır. Bu sertifika, sertifika sahibi kişinin bir araştırma doğruluğu eğitmeni olarak gerekli didaktik becerilere sahip olduğunu gösterir. Katılımcılar online ve yüz yüze dersleri tamamladıklarında ve 10 başka araştırmacıyı eğittiklerinde sertifikayı almaya hak kazanırlar.Katılımcıların tercihen tüm eğitim oturumlarına katılmış, toplantılar arasındaki dönemde beş alıştırmayı uygulamış ve 10 başka araştırmacıyı bu beş alıştırmanın en az üçü üzerinden eğitmiş olmaları gerekmektedir. Ancak bu yükümlülükler gerektiği durumlarda değiştirilebilir (örneğin küçük araştırma topluluklarında eğitim almaya istekli 10 araştırmacı bulmak zor olabilir). Eğitim alan kişinin sertifika almaya hak kazanmak için yeteri kadar dersi tamamlayıp tamamlamadığına eğitmen karar verecektir. Becerilerine güveniyor olmaları durumunda eğitimi alan katılımcılar iki yüz yüze oturum arasında yalnızca alıştırmaları uygulamak yerine 10 araştırmacıyı eğitmeyi de tercih edebilirler.ştırmacıyı eğitmeyi de tercih edebilirler.)
VIRT2UE + (VIRT2UE: A European Train-the-Trainer Programme for Teaching Research Integrity)
Values and norms + (Values are important beliefs or ideals of … Values are important beliefs or ideals of a person in a community, serving as a motivation for action. Norms are action-guiding rules. The difference between a value and a norm is that a value is general, referring to an overall ideal, whereas a norm is concrete, specifying certain things that have to be done (or omitted). Values can be operationalized in specifying norms; norms refer to and are justified by underlying values.to and are justified by underlying values.)

First Insubria International School in Methodology, Ethics and Integrity in Biomedical Science + (Video on research integrity and ethics.)

WHO Policy on Open Access + (WHO’s open access policy requires WHO‑auth … WHO’s open access policy requires WHO‑authored and WHO‑funded journal articles to be published open access from 1 January 2021, preferably in journals indexed in DOAJ and with agreements to deposit the version of record in PubMed Central and Europe PMC. WHO does not support APCs for hybrid journals except in transitional cases; accepted manuscripts must be deposited with no embargo and licensed under CC BY 3.0 IGO (WHO‑authored) or CC BY 4.0 (WHO‑funded). WHO publications since November 2016 are released under CC BY‑NC‑SA 3.0 IGO, and the policy includes explicit expectations for data availability statements and deposition of datasets with persistent identifiers. The page links to WHO journals indexed in DOAJ and to IRIS, WHO’s publication repository.and to IRIS, WHO’s publication repository.)
Debate vs Dialogue + (Watch this interactive video, which explains the difference between debate and dialogue!)
Introduction to the evaluation of the effectiveness of Research Ethics and Integrity (REI) training + (We may start with a simple question: why m … We may start with a simple question: why measure research ethics and integrity (REI) training effectiveness? To teachers this may sound like a strange question as this is one of the main things teachers need to do – making a conclusion if the learners are learning, improving, developing. Watts et al. (2017) also highlight that occasionally various authorities require evidence of people improving their knowledge and skills as a result of a training.Measuring the effectiveness of training is like conducting research – there should be a guiding question (e.g. What do participants learn, and how is that related to what they are meant to learn through the training? How do learning activities encourage engagement and learning?), then there should be a tool to collect information and a means to analyse the information. Finally, results should be interpreted, and one can make a conclusion about whether the training achieves its aims.The BEYOND Measurement toolbox introduced in this module gives an overview of large-scale as well as small-scale feasible measurement instruments on short, medium and long-term training effects adapted to the needs of a variety of target groups and different fields/domains. We understand the measurement of training effect through the learning achieved and displayed as a result of participation in training. This means that the learning is always relative to the goals of the training. The examples of how to understand the learning taking place in REI training may be good for certain types of training and contexts, whereas in others they may not be feasible. Because training, its learning objectives and the pedagogical approaches vary, we have aimed to present a broad array of measurements and other means of evaluating the learning that takes place.Tools include a variety of examples ranging from self-evaluation instruments to pre-post-texts, to physiological markers to the use of authentic learning activities, from individual measurement to group learning, from micro to macro level. We have not restricted this exploration and analysis to include strictly means of measurement in a quantitative sense of the word but have also included qualitative indicators of the worth or success of training.ators of the worth or success of training.)
The Environmental Cost of Software and Online Services + (We rarely think about the environmental co … We rarely think about the environmental cost of streaming a movie, joining a video call, or downloading a podcast— but the digital world runs on data centers that use huge amounts of energy, water, and land. This article by the Mozilla Foundation, linked in the first slide of this course (www.mozillafoundation.org/en/blog/ai-internet-carbon-footprint/), breaks down the “invisible” footprint of digital activity.Skip the section on AI — we’ll cover that in a separate training module. Read the rest of the article and then come back to complete the interactive exercises.ack to complete the interactive exercises.)
Author accused of stealing research and publishing under their name + (We received a letter from a third party, a … We received a letter from a third party, accusing author A of putting his/her name against an article, published in our journal, when the research itself belongs to author A's student.Our journal is a fully English language publication and the accusing third party and author A are from a non-English speaking country, as is the student (assumedly). The accusing third party forwarded the student's research paper to the editor which is entirely written in another language but contained an English abstract.The Editor contacted author A and the response received included an attached confirmation letter supposedly from his/her student stating that they had no involvement in the published work by author A and that their research is completely separate to the published paper by author A.We have several concerns:1. It is difficult for the editor to examine the abstract the third party sent to us against the published article by author A.2. We do not know if the response letter emailed from author A, confirming no involvement in author A's paper, is genuinely from the student.3. The accuser's identity or relation to the matter is unknown to us. Ideally the editor needs to contact the student directly but we need bona fide contact details of the student and we are not sure we would get it from the accuser or the accused author A. Google is also of little help as there are so many people with the name.as there are so many people with the name.)
Wellcome – Open Access Policy and Guidance (2025) + (Wellcome’s policy applies to original rese … Wellcome’s policy applies to original research publications arising in whole or in part from its funding. It requires immediate open access, typically under CC BY, and provides detailed guidance on compliance routes, acknowledgement of funding, and when a No‑Derivatives (ND) licence exception may be requested. From 1 January 2025, Wellcome will only fund APCs for articles in fully open access journals or platforms indexed in DOAJ; repository‑based routes and rights retention remain available. Additional guidance covers open access funding for books and chapters, support for centres and programmes, and how to manage rights and third‑party content. to manage rights and third‑party content.)
Research misconduct + (What is research misconduct? Which practic … What is research misconduct? Which practices are considered ‘misconduct’ and which might be labelled a less serious ‘misbehavior’ or ‘questionable research practice’? For some, misconduct is synonymous with ‘FFP’ - Falsification, Fabrication and Plagiarism '"`UNIQ--ref-000000C3-QINU`"'– whereas others consider a failure to meet ethical, legal and professional obligations, and even a failure to properly deal with misconduct allegations, to qualify as misconduct. '"`UNIQ--ref-000000C4-QINU`"'.There is ongoing debate among academics how to precisely define research misconduct. '"`UNIQ--ref-000000C5-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--ref-000000C6-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--ref-000000C7-QINU`"'The European Code of Conduct on Research Integrity '"`UNIQ--ref-000000C8-QINU`"' refers to misconduct as FFP. Other violations which damage the integrity of the research are referred to as ‘other unacceptable practices’.'"`UNIQ--references-000000C9-QINU`"'ices’.'"`UNIQ--references-000000C9-QINU`"')
The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines + (What should be included within research re … What should be included within research reports? Reporting guidelines are consensus-based recommendations for minimum standards of reporting. They are structured and simple tools for researchers to be used during the writing process. The EQUATOR Network defines a reporting guideline as“[a] checklist, flow diagram, or structured text to guide authors in reporting a specific type of research, developed using explicit methodology.” '"`UNIQ--ref-000002F9-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--references-000002FA-QINU`"'NU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-000002FA-QINU`"')
Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals + (When a grant proposal is reviewed, the rev … When a grant proposal is reviewed, the reviewers can have a confict of interest (COI). COIs should be declared by external reviewers and employees of research funding organizations (RFOs). RFOs and/or host institutions applying for funding need to have a code in place stating what constitutes a COI, how to declare a COIs, and what steps need to be taken when there is a COI.teps need to be taken when there is a COI.)
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct + (When formal allegations of misconduct are made, institutions handling such allegations must follow certain procedures to ensure that legal and professional rights are not encroached upon.)
Intellectual property rights in research collaborations + (When research produces new inventions and … When research produces new inventions and ideas, these can be protected in the form of intellectual property (IP) rights. “Intellectual property includes all exclusive rights to intellectual creations. It encompasses two types of rights: industrial property, which includes inventions (patents), trademarks, industrial designs and models and designations of origin, and copyright, which includes artistic and literary property”. '"`UNIQ--ref-00000016-QINU`"' Countries have their own legislation concering IP rights. Examples of IP rights are patents, copyright and trademarks.'"`UNIQ--references-00000017-QINU`"'arks. '"`UNIQ--references-00000017-QINU`"')
Funding (Sponsorship) bias + (When researchers distort the results or mo … When researchers distort the results or modify conclusions of their study due to pressure of commercial or not-for-profit funders of the study, they engage in questionable research practice. This is called funding or sponsorship bias, but it is also known as “funding effect.” but it is also known as “funding effect.”)
Conflict of interest in peer review + (When reviewers’ own interests, such as per … When reviewers’ own interests, such as personal or work relationships, could influence the way they criticize an article and advise a journal editor, that situation is equivalent to an existing conflict of interest (COI).'"`UNIQ--ref-00000132-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--references-00000133-QINU`"'NU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-00000133-QINU`"')
Legal rights of accused scientists + (When scientists are accused of misconduct their legal rights may be encroached upon.)
Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity + (When you witness a colleague making a mist … When you witness a colleague making a mistake, it is sometimes difficult to address it. It is even more difficult to address if the mistake is not an honest error, but an intentional breach of the rules. Do you dare to take action? If so, what can you do? Or… do you turn a blind eye? And what would that mean for you?ind eye? And what would that mean for you?)
Deception by Research Participants + (While many guidelines and regulations are … While many guidelines and regulations are in place prohibiting research misconduct by researchers, research participants can also fabricate or falsify their data or testimonies. A study by Devine et. al. conducted in 2013 researched whether research subjectes who had enrolled in multiple studies were prone to conceal or exaggerate personal information in order to qualify for inclusion criteria of a study.'"`UNIQ--ref-00000022-QINU`"' Three quarters of the research subjects were found to engage in some form of deception, such as having been enrolled in a previous study, concealing health symptoms or not reporting medication. One likely reason for participants' deception is the financial compensation for enrolling in a study.'"`UNIQ--references-00000023-QINU`"'tudy. '"`UNIQ--references-00000023-QINU`"')
Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (While supervising a student writing a thes … While supervising a student writing a thesis, doing his/her first project or submitting his/her first research, ensure respectable and honest communication. The supervisor's approachability and stance might affect the student's long-term wilingness to engage in research or pursue a career in research, and conduct ethical and responsible research. conduct ethical and responsible research.)
Path2Integrity + (With the European research landscape rapid … With the European research landscape rapidly changing, nowadays, it is becoming increasingly essential to emphasise the virtue of research integrity and to start handling new scientific techniques in a comprehensible way. Research integrity is a constituent of more innovation, growth and high-quality jobs. It leads to more efficient, appropriate, useful and reliable scientific evidence for policy-makers and entrepreneurs, where decisions based on research results lead to a better future. research results lead to a better future.)
Gauging the potential societal contributions of research and innovation – a guide for HEFRCs + (With this guide, Higher Education, Funding … With this guide, Higher Education, Funding and Research Centres (HEFRCs) wishing to implement an ETHNA System will learn how to monitor and respond to the potential societal contributions of research and innovation (R&I). You will gain insight into the benefits of responsible research and innovation (RRI) in addressing transitions related to the challenges of our time.Based on stakeholder statements and perspectives gathered through literature reviews, surveys and deliberative workshops, you will get answers to the question of how organisations can best identify societal needs in order to address today’s most pressing demands. The guide highlights the different stakeholder viewpoints, draws on key findings from other EU-funded projects such as EURAXESS, BOHEMIA or PE2020 and consults a variety of networks such as SIS.net, ECsite, EUSEA, GenPORT, Scientix, EUCYS, RRI Tools, ENRIO, ENERI, EURAXESS.Following the success story of “The European Charter for Researchers” and “The Code of Conduct for Recruitment”, which address the need for a consolidated and structured EU research policy, you will get inspiration and motivation to create an ETHNA System Code of Ethics and Good Practices (CEGP).stem Code of Ethics and Good Practices (CEGP).)
Importance of healthy lifestyle + (With this writing, I hope to emphasize the … With this writing, I hope to emphasize the importance of not only mental, but also physical health in teenagers. They are expected to be intelligent, tough, and healthy. In the academic world, a healthy lifestyle is not valued as highly as it should be. What is the severity of problem that's caused by not many teenagers maintaining healthy lifstyle? How does that impact the young researchers?ow does that impact the young researchers?)
XR4Human + (XR4Human is a three-year Horizon Europe pr … XR4Human is a three-year Horizon Europe project (2022–2025) that promotes the ethical and human-centered development of Extended Reality (XR) technologies. It aims to co-create living guidelines addressing policy, regulation, governance, and interoperability issues in XR to build public trust and support a competitive European XR ecosystem. Key deliverables include a European Code of Conduct for inclusive XR, a repository of test cases demonstrating best practices, a rating system for XR experiences, and an educational toolbox for informed user decision-making. The project engages industry, regulators, developers, and users to ensure XR design reflects human rights, privacy, well-being, diversity, and accessibility. well-being, diversity, and accessibility.)
Payment in different contexts: How can payment reflect local considerations? + (Young Lives is an international study of c … Young Lives is an international study of childhood poverty, involving 12,000 children growing up over 15 years in Ethiopia, the state of Andhra Pradesh in India, Peru and Vietnam. Two cohorts of children – a younger cohort who were born in 2001-02 and an older cohort born in 1994-95 – are being followed. A variety of survey and qualitative methods are being used to collect data with children, parents, and others in communities.ldren, parents, and others in communities.)
Kavramlara aşinalık kazanmak + (Yüz yüze eğitime hazırlık için yapılacak b … Yüz yüze eğitime hazırlık için yapılacak bu ödevler, derste kullanılacak kavramlara (araştırma doğruluğuyla ilişkili erdemler, değerler, normlar, ahlaki ikilem ve ahlaki çatışma gibi) ilişkin temel bir anlayış oluşturmakta ve sizi yüz yüze oturumlarda karşılaşacağınız alıştırmalara hazırlamaktadır.laşacağınız alıştırmalara hazırlamaktadır.)
Diyalog içerisinde fikir yürütmek + (Yüz yüze ya da konferans görüşmesi şeklind … Yüz yüze ya da konferans görüşmesi şeklinde gerçekleştirilecek olan katılımlı oturumlarda, eğitim alan diğer katılımcılar ve eğitmenlerinizle birlikte olacaksınız. Bu oturumlarda online derslerin içeriği üzerine yorumlamalarda bulunacak ve bu derslerde edindiğiniz bilgileri, eğitmen(ler) tarafından yönlendirilecek olan grup alıştırmaları esnasında uygulamayla birleştireceksiniz.Alıştırmalar sırasında kendi deneyimleriniz üzerine fikir yürütmeye yönlendirilecek ve, diğer katılımcılarla diyalog halinde, (gerçek) ahlaki ikilemler ile ilgili ahlaki değerlendirmeler yapacak ve bu ikilemlere karşılık olarak erdemli yanıtlar geliştireceksiniz.Ayrıca, eğitmen olarak rolünüze, her bir alıştırmanın didaktiğine ve bunları kendi çalışma ortamınızda nasıl öğreteceğinize odaklanarak başkalarında aynı yorumlama ve fikir yürütme süreçlerini nasıl geliştireceğinizi öğreneceksiniz.ni nasıl geliştireceğinizi öğreneceksiniz.)
05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + ([http://www.reviewingresearch.com/realisti … [http://www.reviewingresearch.com/realistic-decisions-making-judgements-in-committee/ REalistiC Decisions] is a case analysis method proposed by [https://uk.linkedin.com/in/hugh-davies-61029750 Hugh Davies] MB BS, Research Ethics Advisor for the Health Research Authority (‘HRA’) and former Consultant Paediatrician at Oxford University Hospitals.Although intended to be a procedure for reviewing research ethics proposals, it is flexible enough to be used to analyse research integrity cases.'"`UNIQ--ref-0000003F-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--references-00000040-QINU`"'NU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-00000040-QINU`"')