Difference between revisions of "Template:RT Resource"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(MWBot)
(MWBot)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
<div class="block-text"><code>Info: Preview of Interactive Content is not available here. Click on the header to open a preview.</code>
 
<div class="block-text"><code>Info: Preview of Interactive Content is not available here. Click on the header to open a preview.</code>
 
{{#ask:[[Category:Resource]][[Resource Type::Interactive]]}}
 
{{#ask:[[Category:Resource]][[Resource Type::Interactive]]}}
{{#widget:H5P|ID=4}}
+
{{Widget-Test}}
 
{{#ifeq:{{{3|}}}|Interactive|{{#widget:H5P|ID={{#explode:{{{1|}}}|-|1}}}}}}{{#ask:
 
{{#ifeq:{{{3|}}}|Interactive|{{#widget:H5P|ID={{#explode:{{{1|}}}|-|1}}}}}}{{#ask:
 
[[{{{1|}}}]]
 
[[{{{1|}}}]]

Revision as of 13:28, 21 December 2023

{{{3}}}
[[]]
Info: Preview of Interactive Content is not available here. Click on the header to open a preview.

Acting with Research Integrity, Bottom-up fight against exploitation, Case study: : Low-resourced research environments as a barrier to openness, Case: Apply the Emanuel Framework, Conflicts of interest in citizen science - case study, Debate vs Dialogue, Diner Pensant: Reflection, Ethical Decision Making in Research, Ethical and societal foundations of open science - Case Study, Ethics Dumping, Fairness, respect, care and honesty, Find the inappropriate duplications in biomedical images, Find the inappropriate duplications in biomedical images 2, Find the inappropriate duplications in biomedical images 3, Find the inappropriate duplications in biomedical images 4, Four aspects of data accuracy in citizen science, Have you used the TRUST code?, Helicopter Research, Helsinki Declaration - highlight the obligation, Humanity's Challenges, Norms of the ECoC, PREPARED Kick-Off Webinar, PREPARED Paris Meeting Webinar, Philosophical Justifications for Human Subjects Research, Prevention of research misconduct in open science, Protection of Research Participants - Case Study, Protection of research participants (test), Quality of research outputs and data sets -- Case study, ROSiE Case Study: Prevention of research misconduct in open science, ROSiE Case Study: Quality of research outputs and data sets, ROSiE Case Study: Risks to environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems, ROSiE Test Ethical and societal foundations of open science, ROSiE Test: Conflict of interests, ROSiE Test: Ethical and societal foundations of open science, ROSiE Test: Ethical aspects of citizen science, ROSiE Test: Ethical aspects of citizen science, ROSiE Test: Protection of research participants rights in open science, ROSiE Test: Protection of research participants rights in open science, ROSiE Test: Quality of data, ROSiE Test: Risks to environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems, Research Integrity - Quiz!, Rights of Citizen Scientists - Case Study, Scenario #1, Scenario #2, Scenario #3, Scenario #4, Scenario 1: Collaborative working, Skewed Research Attention, The Middle Position, The San Code of Research Ethics... further results Template:Widget-Test Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "".(Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "".)

Open About
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6