Search by property

From The Embassy of Good Science

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "Remarks" with value "At the end of the course, you will receive a Certificate.". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 26 results starting with #1.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

  • Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling  + ('''List of contributors:''' Fenneke Blom '''List of contributors:'''</br></br>Fenneke Blom</br></br></br>We thank Nele Bracke, Stefanie van der Burght, Natalie Evans, Nicole Föger, Tamarinde Haven, Mike Kalichman, Armin Schmolmüller, and Guy Widdershoven for their constructive feedback during the process of developing!</br></br>This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782. programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
  • Virtues and Norms  + ('''List of contributors:''' Giulia Inguag'''List of contributors:'''</br></br>Giulia Inguaggiato, Margreet Stolper</br></br>For their feedback and contribution, we would like to thank: Signe Mezinska, Armin Schmolmüller, Rea Scepanovic, Tom Lindermann and Daniel Pizzolato, Erika Lofstrom, Solveig Corner.</br></br>This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782. programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
  • Debate and Dialogue  + ('''List of contributors:''' Margreet Stol'''List of contributors:'''</br></br>Margreet Stolper, Giulia Inguaggiato.</br></br>We thank Rea Scepanovic, Marco Consentino, Vasalis Markakis, Armin Schmolmeuller, Ruzica Tokalic, Erika Löfström and Solveig Cornér for their constructive feedback during the process of developing!</br></br>This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782.</br></br>This exercise has been translated [https://embassy.science/wiki-wiki/images/6/69/VIRT2UE_Debate_and_Dialogue_exercise_Instructions_Trainee_TURKISH.pdf in Turkish].tructions_Trainee_TURKISH.pdf in Turkish].)
  • Modified Dilemma Game  + ('''List of contributors:''' Mustafa Volka'''List of contributors:'''</br></br>Mustafa Volkan Kavas, Joana Araújo, Ana Sofia Carvalho, Giulia Inguaggiato and Margreet Stolper</br></br>This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782. programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
  • Modified Dilemma Game  + ('''List of contributors:''' Mustafa Volka'''List of contributors:'''</br></br>Mustafa Volkan Kavas, Joana Araújo, Ana Sofia Carvalho, Giulia Inguaggiato and Margreet Stolper</br></br>This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782. programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
  • Virtues and Norms  + ('''List of contributors:''' Giulia Ingua'''List of contributors:''' </br></br>Giulia Inguaggiato, Margreet Stolper </br></br>For their feedback and contribution, we would like to thank: Signe Mezinska, Armin Schmolmüller, Rea Scepanovic, Tom Lindermann and Daniel Pizzolato, Erika Lofstrom, Solveig Corner.</br></br>This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782. programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
  • Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research  + ('''List of contributors:''' Jan Helge So'''List of contributors:''' </br></br>Jan Helge Solbakk, Rosemarie Bernabe, Panagiotis Kavouras, Signe Mezinska, Volkan Kavas, Franca Marino.</br></br>This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782. programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
  • Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research  + ('''List of contributors:''' Jan Helge So'''List of contributors:''' </br></br>Jan Helge Solbakk, Rosemarie Bernabe, Panagiotis Kavouras, Signe Mezinska, Volkan Kavas, Franca Marino.</br></br>This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782. programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
  • Debate and Dialogue  + ('''Translations:''' These instructions ar'''Translations:'''</br></br>These instructions are available in Turkish.</br>[[File:VIRT2UE Debate and Dialogue exercise Turkish translation.pdf|none|thumb|Münazara ve Diyalog (Debate and Dialogue)]]</br></br></br></br>'''List of contributors:'''</br></br>Margreet Stolper, Giulia Inguaggiato.</br></br>We thank the WP3 members and Rea Scepanovic, Marco Consentino, Vasalis Markakis, Armin Schmolmeuller, Ruzica Tokalic, Erika Löfström and Solveig Cornér for their constructive feedback during the process of developing!</br></br>This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782. programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
  • Werte/Tugenden und Normen  + (''Liste der Mitwirkenden:'' Giulia Inguag''Liste der Mitwirkenden:''</br></br>Giulia Inguaggiato, Margreet Stolper </br></br>Für ihr Feedback und ihre Beiträge möchten wir uns bei folgenden Personen bedanken: Signe Mezinska, Armin Schmolmüller, Rea Scepanovic, Tom Lindemann and Daniel Pizzolato, Erika Löfström, Solveig Corner.</br></br>Dieses Training wurde im Rahmen des Projekts VIRT2UE entwickelt, das vom  H2020 Forschungsprogramm der Europäischen Union unter der Fördervereinbarung N 741782 gefördert wurde.rdervereinbarung N 741782 gefördert wurde.)
  • Protection of Research Participants  + (<div> # <div><div><div><div><div> # </div></div></div></div></div></div>)
  • 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity  + (Ad. 1: Fraenkel stresses the importance ofAd. 1: Fraenkel stresses the importance of identifying whether the conflict is about ends or means to ends that have been agreed upon. Equally important is to establish the factual context of the situation.'"`UNIQ--ref-00000068-QINU`"'</br></br></br>Ad. 2: This step involves brainstorming for all the available action alternatives for the agent(s) facing the value conflict at hand.</br></br>Ad. 3 and 4: These questions are focused on the expected consequences of the different alternative actions available to those facing the value conflict. What might be the effects of each alternative respectively? Which parties might be affected? Could the consequences spill over to future generations? It might make sense here to distinguish between short- and long-range effects for the individual and other parties. In order to map these consequences, a Values Information Chart ('''Table 1''') could be used.</br>{| class="wikitable" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"</br>| rowspan="3" width="62"|'''Facts'''</br>| rowspan="3" width="67"|'''Alternatives'''</br>| colspan="4" width="476"|'''Consequences'''</br>|-</br>| colspan="2" width="283"|'''Short-Range'''</br>| colspan="2" width="193"|'''Long-Range'''</br>|-</br>| width="136"|'''Self'''</br>| width="147"|'''Others'''</br>| width="97"|'''Self'''</br>| width="97"|'''Others'''</br>|-</br>| rowspan="3" width="62" valign="top"|</br>| width="67" valign="top"|</br>| width="136" valign="top"|</br>| width="147" valign="top"|</br>| width="97" valign="top"|</br>| width="97" valign="top"|</br>|-</br>| width="67" valign="top"|</br>| width="136" valign="top"|</br>| width="147" valign="top"|</br>| width="97" valign="top"|</br>| width="97" valign="top"|</br>|-</br>| width="67" valign="top"|</br>| width="136" valign="top"|</br>| width="147" valign="top"|</br>| width="97" valign="top"|</br>| width="97" valign="top"|</br>|}'''Table 1: Values Information Chart Template'''</br></br>Ad. 5: This question zooms in on the evidence supporting or refuting the potential effects of the alternative actions as identified above. If the case at hand is similar to case studies from the past, it might be useful to study what happened there. Data to that effect should be gathered, and their truthfulness and relevance to the case at hand established.</br></br></br>Ad. 6: A discussion of the desirability of the expected consequences is needed. This should happen based on certain criteria. These criteria might be of a moral, legal, aesthetic, ecological, economic, health and safety and/or a completely different nature. A Value Analysis Chart ('''Table 2''') could be used to keep track of the assessment of the different consequences along the different criteria. In the last column of this chart the desirability of the different consequences is ranked from the most to the least desirable.</br></br></br>Ad. 7: Fraenkel does not explain how the answer to this final question should follow from the analysis above. It seems to be implicit in his method that the answer automatically matches the alternative that turns out to be most desirable over all.</br><br /></br>{| class="wikitable" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="604"</br>| rowspan="2" width="67"|'''Alternatives'''</br>| rowspan="2" width="120"|'''Consequences'''</br>| colspan="7" width="354"|'''Desirability from various points of view'''</br>| rowspan="2" width="64"|'''Ranking'''</br>|-</br>| width="41"|'''Moral'''</br>| width="39"|'''Legal'''</br>| width="55"|'''Aesthetic'''</br>| width="60"|'''Ecological'''</br>| width="58"|'''Economic'''</br>| width="51"|'''Health and Safety'''</br>| width="51"|'''Etc.'''</br>|-</br>| width="67" valign="top"|</br>| width="120" valign="top"|</br>| width="41" valign="top"|</br>| width="39" valign="top"|</br>| width="55" valign="top"|</br>| width="60" valign="top"|</br>| width="58" valign="top"|</br>| width="51" valign="top"|</br>| width="51" valign="top"|</br>| width="64" valign="top"|</br>|-</br>| width="67" valign="top"|</br>| width="120" valign="top"|</br>| width="41" valign="top"|</br>| width="39" valign="top"|</br>| width="55" valign="top"|</br>| width="60" valign="top"|</br>| width="58" valign="top"|</br>| width="51" valign="top"|</br>| width="51" valign="top"|</br>| width="64" valign="top"|</br>|-</br>| width="67" valign="top"|</br>| width="120" valign="top"|</br>| width="41" valign="top"|</br>| width="39" valign="top"|</br>| width="55" valign="top"|</br>| width="60" valign="top"|</br>| width="58" valign="top"|</br>| width="51" valign="top"|</br>| width="51" valign="top"|</br>| width="64" valign="top"|</br>|-</br>| width="67" valign="top"|</br>| width="120" valign="top"|</br>| width="41" valign="top"|</br>| width="39" valign="top"|</br>| width="55" valign="top"|</br>| width="60" valign="top"|</br>| width="58" valign="top"|</br>| width="51" valign="top"|</br>| width="51" valign="top"|</br>| width="64" valign="top"|</br>|}</br></br></br></br>'''Table 2: Value Analysis Chart Template'''[[File:The Value Analysis Method.jpg|thumb|Figure 1. Fraenkel's value analysis method.]]</br>'"`UNIQ--references-00000069-QINU`"'[[File:The Value Analysis Method.jpg|thumb|Figure 1. Fraenkel's value analysis method.]] '"`UNIQ--references-00000069-QINU`"')
  • Rights of Citizen Scientists  + (Additional Resources: #Resnik, D.B. (2019). Citizen scientists as human subjects: Ethical issues. ''Citizen Science: Theory and Practice'', 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.150)
  • Der Selbstauskunfts-Ansatz: Eine Reflexion über das Konzept des Guten in der Wissenschaft  + (Beitragende: Jan Helge Solbakk, Rosemarie Beitragende: Jan Helge Solbakk, Rosemarie Bernabe, Panagiotis Kavouras, Signe Mezinska, Volkan Kavas, Franca Marino.</br></br>Dieses Training wurde im Rahmen des Projekts VIRT2UE entwickelt, welches durch das H2020 Forschungsprogramm der Europäischen Union gefördert wurde (grant agreement N 741782).efördert wurde (grant agreement N 741782).)
  • Der Balanceakt  + (Bert Molewijk, Giulia Inguaggiato, Rose BeBert Molewijk, Giulia Inguaggiato, Rose Bernabe,  Panagiotis Kavouras, Eleni Spayrakou, Vicko Tomic, Franca Marino.</br></br>This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782. programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
  • Eğitimi organize etme  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesiBu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.</br></br>Sertifikalı VIRT2UE eğitmeni olabilmek için eğitimi alan katılımcıların 10 farklı kişiye (tercihen eğitmenlere) bu eğitimi vermesi gerekmektedir. Eğitimin eğitmenlere verilmesinin mümkün olmaması durumunda araştırmacıların (kolaylaştırıcı olarak) eğitilmesi de mümkündür.laştırıcı olarak) eğitilmesi de mümkündür.)
  • Eğitimi organize etme  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesiBu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.</br></br>Sertifikalı VIRT2UE eğitmeni olabilmek için eğitimi alan katılımcıların 10 farklı kişiye (tercihen eğitmenlere) bu eğitimi vermesi gerekmektedir. Eğitimin eğitmenlere verilmesinin mümkün olmaması durumunda araştırmacıların (kolaylaştırıcı olarak) eğitilmesi de mümkündür.laştırıcı olarak) eğitilmesi de mümkündür.)
  • Araştırma doğruluğu konusuna giriş  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • Erdem etiği ve araştırma doğruluğu  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • Mevcut araştırma koşulları altında erdem etiğinin uygulanması  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • Kavramlara aşinalık kazanmak  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • Diyalog içerisinde fikir yürütmek  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • Ara dönem uygulama çalışması  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • Deneyimler üzerine fikir yürütme ve alıştırmaları uygulama  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • Sertifika  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • Diyalog içerisinde fikir yürütmek  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • Ara dönem uygulama çalışması  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • Deneyimler üzerine fikir yürütme ve alıştırmaları uygulama  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • Sertifika  + (Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity  + (By following the instructions, a user willBy following the instructions, a user will be able to:</br></br>*Analyse specific research ethics and research integrity cases;</br>*Understand and explain the process by which they came to their judgment regarding a particular case;</br>*Identity and explain their reasons for their judgment.</br></br>In addition, by following the instructions, a research ethics committee ('REC'), research integrity office ('RIO') or institutional review board ('IRB') will be able to:</br></br>*Facilitate the analysis of research ethics and research integrity cases in accordance with an explicit procedure;</br>*Involve its members in structured deliberation and debate regarding a particular case in accordance with an explicit procedure;</br>*Generate a consensus regarding a specific case.ate a consensus regarding a specific case.)
  • Responsible Research through supervision, mentoring and working together  + (Integrity issues and responsible conduct oIntegrity issues and responsible conduct of research is about you, your project, and the research practice that you work in. Research practices might offer opportunities for RCR but can also include very difficult challenges that can have a huge personal impact. This course takes a positive approach to RCR, without shying away from potential problems.</br></br>To allow for open conversations, this SPOC provides a safe environment. Technically (we took care of that), but also personally and professionally. To ensure the latter, please keep personal matters that you see, hear, or read from others, strictly confidential. A safe environment is further promoted by respecting the contributions of others, without prior judgment.butions of others, without prior judgment.)
  • Uyarlanmış ikilem oyunu  + (Mustafa Volkan Kavas, Joana Araújo, Ana SoMustafa Volkan Kavas, Joana Araújo, Ana Sofia Carvalho, Giulia Inguaggiato and Margreet Stolper.</br></br>Bu eğitim, N 741782 sayılı hibe sözleşmesi gereğince, Avrupa Birliği’ne ait H2020 araştırma programı tarafından fonlanan VIRT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.RT2UE projesi kapsamında geliştirilmiştir.)
  • 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity  + (The original version of the 4QA was develoThe original version of the 4QA was developed to deal with clinical decisions involving patients and dilemmas or conflicts within the doctor-patient relationship.[https://embassy.science/wiki-wiki/index.php/Instruction:41bc2a1d-26f7-49f9-8bf7-9fc6b4ecf10c#_ftn1 <sup><sup>'"`UNIQ--nowiki-0000001B-QINU`"'</sup></sup>] Therefore, there is little room for developing, altering or adapting the method even in clinical settings.[https://embassy.science/wiki-wiki/index.php/Instruction:41bc2a1d-26f7-49f9-8bf7-9fc6b4ecf10c#_ftn2 <sup><sup>'"`UNIQ--nowiki-0000001C-QINU`"'</sup></sup>] Moreover, the four quadrants are said to be responsive to the four principles of biomedical ethics, specifically, autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. This is a normative framework originally developed for biomedicine.</br></br>Here, we have adapted the “original version” to test its applicability in different research ethics and research integrity scenarios.</br></br>The basic structure and the general decision-making procedure embedded in the 4QA approach seem to be adaptable to any cases where various options for decision-making need to be assessed and clarified.</br></br>In adapting the 4QA, the aim is to enable a focused discussion around normative standards pertinent to research ethics and research integrity, leading to the application of case-based reasoning to the facts of the particular case at hand.</br></br>Consequently, the four quadrants of the procedure have been revised so that they not only are responsive to the regulatory frameworks and normative standards that apply to a user’s respective organization in the form of codes of ethics, codes of conduct, and, if applicable, broader national and international research ethics and research integrity codes, but can be applied to non-clinical settings to deal with cases in research ethics and research integrity.</br>----[https://embassy.science/wiki-wiki/index.php/Instruction:41bc2a1d-26f7-49f9-8bf7-9fc6b4ecf10c#_ftnref1 <sup>'"`UNIQ--nowiki-0000001D-QINU`"'</sup>] Sokol DK. The “four quadrants” approach to clinical ethics case analysis; an application and review. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(7):513-516.</br></br>[https://embassy.science/wiki-wiki/index.php/Instruction:41bc2a1d-26f7-49f9-8bf7-9fc6b4ecf10c#_ftnref2 <sup>'"`UNIQ--nowiki-0000001E-QINU`"'</sup>] Schumann JH, Alfandre D. Clinical ethical decision making: the four topics approach. Semin Med Pract 2008;11:36–42.chumann JH, Alfandre D. Clinical ethical decision making: the four topics approach. Semin Med Pract 2008;11:36–42.)
  • Research preparedness for future crises  + (The two webinars presented in this module The two webinars presented in this module have been organized by the [https://prepared-project.eu/ PREPARED] project in collaboration with [https://www.methodspace.com/ SAGE Method Space] who have created [https://www.methodspace.com/blog/researchers-collaborate-to-be-prepared-for-the-next-global-crisis a separate webpage] for their engagement with PREPARED. </br></br>The PREPARED project is funded by the European Union.D project is funded by the European Union.)
  • SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review  + (There are some rules for the course: #YouThere are some rules for the course:</br></br>#You will be invited to use your own cases and experiences of your own research practice. However, you should never use any names of people involved, but describe situations in a more abstract manner.</br>#All experiences and cases that will be shared in the context of this course need to remain confidential, which means that we don’t discuss these issues with others outside the course, and that we create a safe environment in the course where everyone feels free to discuss any issues that you think are relevant.</br>#Issues of integrity are often related to personal emotions and character traits of people. We respect each other’s contributions and show a positive attitude.ontributions and show a positive attitude.)
  • Organizing the training  + (This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
  • Practicing Reflection in Dialogue  + (This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
  • Practicing Reflection in Dialogue  + (This training has been developed by the VIRT2UE project, which has received funding form the European Union’s H2020 research programme under grant agreement N 741782.)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6