Resource
From The Embassy of Good Science
- Choose a category:
- Guide (9)
- Initiative (29)
- Instruction (70)
- Interactive Content (5)
- Report (16)
- Resource (1055)
- Theme (187)
Back
Resources
Materials that help you in your every-day research practice to do Good Science.
There are no results for this report.
Pages in category "Resource"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 1,056 total.
(previous page) (next page)3
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2023 Edition (ALLEA Code)
- Integrating a peer-taught module on practical research ethics into the graduate student orientation curriculum
- Multiple submission
- The Replication Crisis in Psychology
- A Survey of Doctoral Education in Communication Research Ethics
- Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial
- An author realized a paper had plagiarized his thesis. It took the journal four years to retract it.
- Research by Students
- UK Research Integrity Office's Case Study Collection
- Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors
- Federation of European Toxicologists and European Societies of Toxicology (Eurotox) Code of Ethics
- Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
- PRINTEGER
- Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth
- The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research
- Swedish Research Council's Conflict of Interest Policy
- Peer review card exchange game
- Vulnerable Populations
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education
- The Case of Falsified Data
- Research published by Hans Eysenck is unsafe
- The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines
- Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research
- Power to the People
- Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes
- Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students
- A 24-year-old sociology paper found to have plagiarised a 1975 article
4
- In the matter of J Hendrik Schön
- Banked Samples and HD Testing
- European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (ENRESSH)
- FOSTER project workshop
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty
- Research Integrity & Research Ethics: Guidelines of the Austrian Science Funds
- What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing?
- UKRIO's Good practice in internet-mediated research
- A qualitative approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training development: identification of metacognitive strategies
- Research Integrity: the Experience of a Doubting Thomas
- Disclosure of Sources of Grant Funds
- Casuistry – is this RM, QRP or RCR? Three cases with dilemmas
- The Three Rs of Animal Research
- RCR online course: build an online course to augment RCR training using evidenced-based learning theory
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study
- What to communicate in retraction notices?
- European Astronomical Society (EAS) Ethics Statement and Guidelines for Good Practice
- Anonymity Revisited
- Duplicate publication uprooted from plant journal
- Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values
- Community's of Practice Datamanagement & Privacy
- Instilling scholarly integrity
- It’s Still Plagiarism
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section
- Slow Code
- Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet
- Responsible science: vol. 2
- Community consultation and public disclosure: preliminary results from a new model
- Credit for work
- Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS)
- Reproducibility training
- Protecting Research Subjects
- Integrating Ethics Into a Research Experience for Undergraduates
- Open science outlook 1: status and trends around the world
- Open Access Policy at Czech Academy of Sciences
- UKRIO's Guidance for researchers on retractions in academic journals
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage
- Fraud in Fluid Resuscitation Research
- The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers
- Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media
- Eigenfactorizer
- Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People
- Conflicts with Community Leaders
- Ousted: Rule-Breaking Lundbeck CEO and Novartis Scientist Get the Boot
- Declaration of Geneva
- Irish Council for Bioethics' Recommendations for Promoting Research Integrity
- PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven)
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel
- Designing Online Resources in Preparation for Authentic Laboratory Experiences
- A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials
- Research ethics committee conditions: Ethical challenges of researching with poor communities in Malawi
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide
- Bias in hiring
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture
- Responsible conduct in research
- Data Handling and Record Keeping
- The Paroxetine 352 Bipolar Trial: A Study in Medical Ghostwriting
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice for Fieldwork Training
- The value of respect in human research ethics: a conceptual analysis and a practical guide
- Collaboration dispute
- Irish Universities Quality Board's Good Practice for Institutional Research in Irish Higher Education
- Training overview
- PRBB Code of Good Scientific Practice
- Hidden for a century, 'fake' is actually a Van Gogh
- Writing usable qualitative health research findings
- Paxil Study Under Fire
- Psychologist made up sex bias results
- Overview: underserved areas of education in the responsible conduct of research: authorship
- Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: Issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC
- Guidelines for Responsible Data Management in Scientific Research
- Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials
- The New Danish Research Misconduct etc. Act
5
- The French National Research Agency's Policy for Ethics and Research Integrity
- Outsourcing animal experimentation
- Spanish National Statement on Scientific Integrity
- To Accept or Not to Accept
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold
- When is Advanced Training Necessary?
- Team-based learning instruction for responsible conduct of research positively impacts ethical decision-making
- The German Association of University Professors and Lecturers' (DHV) Position Paper on Scientific Self-regulation and Scientific Misconduct
- Business Ethics Perspectives: Faculty Plagiarism and Fraud
- Self help in medical ethics
- Policy documents of the German Rectors’ Conference (HRK)
- Journal calls 2012 paper “deeply offensive to particular minorities”
- Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses
- Japan fails to settle university dispute
- Image Search Triggers Italian Police Probe
- Act on the Danish Council for Research and Innovation Policy
- Self-plagiarism and suspected salami publishing
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues
- Official notice published for chem paper slated for retraction in 2011
- Good scientific practice for courses in science and medicine
- A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data
- Informed Consent with Pre-Testing Convenience Samples
- Path2Integrity "RI in Curricula" map
- Statistical Forensics. Check Rightmost Digits for Uniform Distribution
- Publication planning: promoting an ethics of transparency and integrity in biomedical research
- Child protection and confidentiality: Surveying children’s experiences of violence, abuse and neglect
- OAPEN OA Books Toolkit
- Plagiarism Charge for Romanian Minister
- COPE Cases
- Declaration of Istanbul
- The Unfortunate Experiment
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of institutional research integrity stakeholders
- Responsible science: vol. 1
- The Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports' Law on Scientific Activity and Higher Education'
- Author’s Permission Guidelines
- An empirical research study of the efficacy of two plagiarism-detection applications
- Misuse of grant money for personal purposes
- First Insubria International School in Methodology, Ethics and Integrity in Biomedical Science
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking”
- Data acquisition
- Research Integrity in trying times: a scenario on the presentation and dissemination of information
- Ethical Dilemmas and Moral Responsibilities
- Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine
- Is there a reproducibility crisis in science?
- Frauds and misconduct in scientific research: a harsh lesson from the pandemic
- Dutch psychology fraudster avoids trial
- Carlo Croce: data falsification and other scientific misconduct
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition
- Research Reproducibility
- Mentoring: time constraints
- Top 10 tips for robust & ethical research
- Kairos – A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy
- Organizing Academic Research Papers: Limitations of the Study
- Guidance for implementation of ethics and integrity training
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on monitoring funded projects
- Plagiarism, Voluntary Settlement Agreements and Public Health Service Grants
- Improving the informed consent process-a booklet on participants' rights in medical research
- The Hazardous Consent Forms
- Oviedo Convention
- Author misconduct: Not just the editors' responsibility
- Raising Open and User-friendly Transparency-Enabling Technologies forPublic Administrations
- Czech Code of Ethics for Researchers
- European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Standards of Conduct
- VIRT2UE train-the-trainer program
- The rector who resigned after plagiarizing a student’s PhD thesis
- Test
- Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: Extasy
- Public Health Practice vs Research
- Hiding A Suspect
- Handling self-admissions of fraud
6
- The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research
- Attempting to Assure Accuracy
- ENRIO Collection
- Authorship in scholarly manuscripts: practical considerations for resident and early career physicians
- Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering
- The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (2)
- What's in That Bottle? What's in That Pipe?
- The Danish National Research Foundation Act
- CIOMS International guidelines on good governance practice for research institutions
- The Dublin City University's Code of Good Research Practice
- Law on Science and Studies of the Republic of Lithuania
- Image manipulation as a general practice
- Fraudulent algorithm: A pain too deep for adequate analgesia
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Research Integrity Policy
- History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
- UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research
- Five cases considered and concluded by the UK's General Medical Council
- False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial
- Payments to young researchers in Malawi
- Australian Guide to Managing and Investigating Potential Breaches of the Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research