Maintenance:ExportThemesRelated

	Related Themes	Related Resources	Related Instructions
Cognitive dissonance and moral distress	Virtues in research integrity	The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition Declaration of Helsinki
Collaborative working	Cross-boundary collaborations High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations	The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition Collaborative science Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research Long Distance Collaboration
Conflict of interests	Standards of authorship Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals Conflict of interest in peer review	707fea28-db9c-4bc1-b1f4-b346f62f8572 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Advice
Data Practices and Management
Development and Value of National Research Integrity Codes		The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
Dialogue versus debate	Moral conflict and moral dilemma
Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity
Epistemic virtues	Virtues in research integrity	The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition
Ethics of ageing
Funders	AllTrials campaign Non-reporting of negative findings Conflict of interests	2b78e1bc-2187-4569-95fa-49468d5b5385 The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach
How to be a good lab partner	Collaborative working	A bullshit excuse? My lab notebook “was blown into a manure pit”
Mertonian norms
Moral conflict and moral dilemma	Cognitive dissonance and moral distress	The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science The Rotterdam Dilemma Game
Peer review	F723d94e-5010-4c4a-ad26-cf56fce97a1f Peer review Hostile peer review	Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions Peer review Journal peer review
Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers	Responsible mentoring	Who will mentor the mentors? Mentoring: expectations
Preprint servers	Open access publishing: the new norm? Post-publication peer review FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results	Your preprint pre-posting checklist Preprints. Instructions for Authors
Protecting research subjects	Balancing harms and benefits Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials	Declaration of Helsinki The Nuremberg Code
Publication	Peer review	Committee On Publication Ethics (COPE) Guidelines
Qualitative research
Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting	Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors Statistical pre-registration
Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration	Collaborative working Cross-boundary collaborations High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations Intellectual property rights in research collaborations
Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection
Questionable Research Practices in Study Design	AllTrials campaign Prospective registration of clinical trials Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors Statistical pre-registration
Replicability	Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)
Replicability in the Humanities	Replicability	Hidden for a century, 'fake' is actually a Van Gogh
Research culture	Responsible supervision Gender bias	The Culture of Scientific Research in the UK Research culture
Research metrics	Altmetrics H-index Journal Impact Factor	Publication/Authorship Authorship and publication
Research misconduct	Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors Fabrication Falsification	The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition Mea Culpa: Scientific Misconduct - perspective of a research ethics board chair Research misconduct Nine pitfalls of research misconduct 7fcb92c2-8d04-4106-875f-166af054c161 C473b44b-f01c-4873-bbf0-f9562aab275b
Responsible mentoring	Supervision Responsible supervision	Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project Mentoring: expectations Mentoring: lack of interest Mentoring: failure Mentoring: minorities Mentoring: time constraints Mentoring: disabilities
The decision on ice		The Ethics Codes Collection Declaration of Geneva Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine
Values and norms	Moral conflict and moral dilemma
Virtues in research integrity	Cognitive dissonance and moral distress Moral conflict and moral dilemma		Introduction of Virtue Ethics to Research Integrity Virtue Ethics under Current Research Conditions Virtues and Norms
Collaboration In Research	Collaborative working	Collaborative science	16d2a329-610b-4d6b-be11-ace8987f28be
Cross-boundary collaborations	Collaborative working High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations	The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition Up, Up, and Away: Clinical Trials Go International Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations
High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations	Collaborative working Cross-boundary collaborations	Collaborative science Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research
SSH research as part of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research	Collaborative working	Tools of the interdisciplinary trade: how to make your interdisciplinary project a success Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Failures Lessons Learned from Cautionary Tales Social Sciences and Humanities Matter. Guidelines on How To Successfully Design and Implement, Mission-Oriented Research Programmes
Conflict of interest in peer review	Conflict of interests	Publication/Authorship 707fea28-db9c-4bc1-b1f4-b346f62f8572 Peer review Journal peer review Authorship and publication
Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective	Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals Conflict of interest in peer review Conflict of interests Editorial conflicts of interest Intellectual conflicts of interest
Editorial conflicts of interest	Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals Conflict of interest in peer review Conflict of interests	Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges 707fea28-db9c-4bc1-b1f4-b346f62f8572 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form
Intellectual conflicts of interest	Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals Intellectual property rights in research collaborations Conflict of interest in peer review Outcome reporting bias Conflict of interests
The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability
Anonymisation and pseudonymisation
Data management plans	Data Practices and Management	Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management
Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19)		Data Privacy & Security Global Coronavirus Toolkit Innovation under pressure: Implications for data privacy during the Covid-19 pandemic Guidelines 03/2020 on the processing of data concerning health for the purpose of scientific research in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak
FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results	Open access publishing: the new norm? Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science	Mantra (research data management training) Open learning research ethics Data management Data management checklist
Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies
How to select trustworthy repositories	Data Practices and Management Sharing and preserving data in repositories	Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management
Imputation of missing data in clinical trials	Data management plans	Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project Guidelines for Responsible Data Management in Scientific Research
Methods to increase data availability
Sharing and preserving data in repositories	FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results Data Practices and Management Data management plans “Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data” How to select trustworthy repositories	Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management
... further results