Concept:Activity Stream
From The Embassy of Good Science
Description of concept "Activity Stream"RDF feed
Activity Stream
[[Category:Resource||Guide||Initiative||Instruction||Report||Theme]]
P
- Planetary health: Connecting climate, health, and power +
- Plastic waste final quiz +
- Platforma za otvorenu nauku (2018), Ministry of Education Science and Technological Development (MESTD) +
- Podcast +
- Policy Brief 1: Glossary for Academic Integrity +
- Policy Brief on excellent science communication for urgent societal challenges +
- Policy Statement on Open Access for Publications from Publicly Funded Research Projects Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (2014), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) +
- Policy documents of the German Rectors’ Conference (HRK) +
- Policy on Ethics and Scientific Integrity (2014), Agence Nationale de la Recherche +
- Policy on Open Access (2017) — NordForsk +
- Policy on Open Access (2017) — NordForsk +
- Policy on open access to research publications (2019), the Federation of Finnish Learned Societies (TSV) +
- Policy statement on ensuring research integrity in Ireland (2020), National Research Integrity Forum +
- Polish Code of Ethics for Research Workers +
- Polish Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies' Good Scientific Research Practice Recommendations +
- Polish National Science Centre Code on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing +
- Political points +
- Política Nacional de Ciencia Abierta 2022- 2031 (2022), Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación +
- Política de acceso abierto a la información científica y a atos de investigación financiados con fondos públicos de la ANID (2022), Chilean National Agency for Research and Development +
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers +
- Population Health Data Implementation Guide (Deliverable 7.1) +
- Portuguese National Council of Ethics for the Life Sciences Recommendation on Integrity in Scientific Research +
- Position Paper on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Austria +
- Position statement of the UKRIO: Statutory regulation of research integrity +
- Possible Conflict of Interest +
- Possible omission of information essential for conclusions in a research paper +
- Postdoc randomly chose data during figure assembly +
- Potential figure manipulation with corresponding author uncontactable +
- Power to the People +
- PowerPoint presentation: From disconnection to planetary stewardship +
- Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management +
- Practical actions +
- Practical tools and strategies for researchers to increase replicability +
- Practicing Reflection in Dialogue +
- Pratiquer une recherche intègre et responsable - Conducting Ethical and Responsible Research – Guidelines (2017), CNRS Ethics Committee (62. ChatGPT translated French Code, p. 1) +
- Premature release of clinical trials data +
- Preparatory Reading: Introduction to Concepts & Themes +
- Preparatory Viewing: Introduction to Concepts & Themes +
- Prepared_Healthy Volunteers and Human Challenge Studies +
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers +
- Preparing whistleblowers for reporting research misconduct +
- Preprint servers +
- Preprints. Instructions for Authors +
- Pressure to disclose confidential research findings +
- Prevention of research misconduct in open science +
- Printeger Upright +
- Privacy +
- Procedures of the Science Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences +
- Procrastinating Researcher Delegates Grant Reviews to Trainee +
- Procrastinating Reviewer +
- Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction +
- Promoting Integrity as an Integral Dimension of Excellence in Research (Policy brief) +
- Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd +
- Prompt cards - Environmental justice in practice +
- Protecting Research Subjects +
- Protecting an endangered species: training physicians to conduct clinical research. +
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis +
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold +
- Protecting research subjects +
- Protection of Research Participants +
- Protection of Research Participants - Case Study +
- Protection of research participants (test) +
- Protocol Violations Putting Animal Subjects in Harm’s Way +
- Psychologist made up sex bias results +
- Psychologist made up sex bias results +
- Psychology Grad Student Faked Data +
- Psychology of misbehavior (in Dutch) +
- Public Health Practice vs Research +
- Publication +
- Publication and data ownership +
- Publication planning: promoting an ethics of transparency and integrity in biomedical research +
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Publication/Authorship +
- Publishing complications and patient safety +
- Publishing your research open access (2020) , Swedish Research Council +
- Putting actions into practice +
- Putting citizens at the centre of research and innovation- Policy brief +
- Putting the 9Rs to Work: Your Circularity Blueprint +
Q
- Qualitative research +
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education +
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education +
- Quality History Education in the 21st Century Principles and Guidelines +
- Quality of research outputs and data sets +
- Quality of research outputs and data sets -- Case study +
- Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting +
- Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration +
- Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection +
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design +
- Questioning a Mentor +
- Quiz: Understanding Climate Mainstreaming +
R
- RCR Casebook +
- RCR online course: build an online course to augment RCR training using evidenced-based learning theory +
- RDA Endorsed Recommendations & Outputs +
- RE4GREEN +
- REI leadership training SLIDES +
- REI leadership training posters +
- RETHINK +
- RID-SSISS +
- ROSIE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science (2023), Responsible Open Science in Europe (ROSiE) +
- ROSiE +
- ROSiE Case Study: Prevention of research misconduct in open science +
- ROSiE Case Study: Quality of research outputs and data sets +
- ROSiE Case Study: Risks to environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems +
- ROSiE Field-Specific Guidelines on Responsible Open Science +
- ROSiE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science +
- ROSiE Test Ethical and societal foundations of open science +
- ROSiE Test: Conflict of interests +
- ROSiE Test: Ethical and societal foundations of open science +
- ROSiE Test: Ethical aspects of citizen science +
- ROSiE Test: Ethical aspects of citizen science +
- ROSiE Test: Protection of research participants rights in open science +
- ROSiE Test: Protection of research participants rights in open science +
- ROSiE Test: Quality of data +
- ROSiE Test: Risks to environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems +
- ROSiE Vide Lectures: Case study for Lecture 2.2: Conflict of interest +
- ROSiE Video Lectures +
- ROSiE Video Lectures Lecture 1.1. Emerging, History & Justifications of Open Science +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 7.2. +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Studies for Lecture 5.2 +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 3.2 +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 3.2 +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 3.3. Data privacy in natural sciences +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 4.2. +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 6.2. +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 8.1. +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case study for Lecture 1.3 +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 1.2. Benefits and Value of Open Science for Different Stakeholders (Rosemarie Barnabe) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 1.3. Main Ethical Challenges in Open Science Implementation (Rosemarie Barnabe) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 2.1. Responsibility of Researchers for the Quality of the Collected, Processed & Stored Data (Panagiotis Kavouras) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 2.2. Responsible Preparation & Management of Quantitative Datasets & Metadata (Olivier Le Gall) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 3.1 Specifics of Informed Consent in the Context of Open Science (Emmi Jennina Kaaya) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 3.2 Responsible Anonymisation & Pseudonymisation (Heidi Beate Bentzen) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 3.3. Tension Between Personal Data Protection & the Aim of Open Science (Heidi Beate Bentzen) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 3.3. Tension Between Personal Data Protection & the Aim of Open Science (Heidi Beate Bentzen) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 4.1 Types of Potential Research Malpractices in Open Science (Søren Holm) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 4.2 Prevention of Research Malpractices in Open Science (Søren Holm) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 5.1. Trust & Trustworthiness in Open Science (Panagiotis Kavouras) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 5.2. Responsible and Critical Use of Open Data & the Research Results (Arild Johan Jansen) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 5.3. Ethical Aspects of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Analysing Open Data (Arild Johan Jansen) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 6.1. Benefits and Risks in Open Peer Review (Olivier Le Gall) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 6.2. Open Access, Open Access Publishing, Predatory Practices (Elina Koivisto) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 6.3. Including Open Science Aspects in Assessing Researchers & Research (Elina Koivisto) +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 7.1. Intellectual Property & Fair Competition +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 7.2. Acknowledging Contributions & Authorship in Open Science +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 7.3. Open Licenses +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 8.1 Responsibilities of Citizen Scientists +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 8.2 Responsibilities of Scientists Towards Citizen Scientists +
- RRI tools collection of resources +
- Rainy Days for a Struggling Mentee +
- Raising Open and User-friendly Transparency-Enabling Technologies forPublic Administrations +
- Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals +
- Randomized consent designs in randomized controlled trials: systematic literature search +
- Re4Green_Micromodule presentation Incorporating gender, health, and climate justice +
- Re4Green Podcast +
- ReGreen_Drag and drop +
- Reaction to bias +
- Recognition and Networking +
- Recognizing scientific artifacts in biomedical literature +
- Recommendation 1/2023, of 16th May, concerning multiple affiliations in scientific journals +
- Recommendation 2/2023, October 17th, on the Institutional affiliation in scientific publications +
- Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers (2018) +
- Recommendations to mainstream citizen science in policy +
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct +
- Recommendations for the History Teaching of Intergroup Conflicts +
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct +
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct +
- Recommendations of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK for Research Integrity Advisers and related background organisations1 +
- Recommendations on the Preparation, Adaptation and Implementation of Academic Ethics Codes by Research and Higher Education Institutions +
- Records From Controversial Twin Study Sealed at Yale Until 2065 +
- Recyclable or Replaceable Plastics +
- Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: The role of education +
- Reflect and respond +
- Reflect individually - Incorporating gender, health, and climate justice in your research: A reflexive question card exercise +
- Reflect on possible changes researchers can make +
- Reflect on the “Omelas analogy” in research +
- Reflect: Linking theory and visual practice +
- Reflecting on Experiences and Practicing Exercises +
- Reflecting with the PEPE Framework +
- Reflection +
- Reflections on the Cleveland Clinic Study of The Batista Operation +
- Reflexive Journaling from "disconnection" to "planetary stewardship" +
- Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering +
- Reflexive inquiry into research framing +
- Reframing Research +
- Reframing Research Table +
- Reimagining sustainable field research: Doing science without doing harm +
- Replicability +
- Replicability in the Humanities +
- Reported Goals For Knowledge to be Learned in Responsible Conduct of Research Courses +
- Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses +
- Reporting Adverse Effects +
- Reporting Findings in a Timely Manner +
- Reporting Full Findings +
- Reporting censurable conditions for employees at University of Oslo (whistleblowing) +
- Reporting violations +
- Reproducibility +
- Reproducibility and Replicability in Science +
- Reproducibility of methodology +
- Reproducibility training +
- Research - who benefits_video1 +
- Research Data Management +
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Research Ethics +
- Research Ethics Compass +
- Research Ethics and Integrity Basics +
- Research Ethics and Integrity Games +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step10_Quiz +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step2_Video +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step3_Audio +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step3_Video +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step3_Video Transcript +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step4_Audio +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step5_Video +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step5_Video Transcript +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step6_Video +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step6_Video Interview Transcript +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step7_Video +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step7_Video Interview Transcript +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step8_Audio Transcript +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step9_Audio1 +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step9_Audio2 +
- Research Ethics and Integrity: Governance and Processes Step9_quiz +
- Research Ethics and integrity for the GREEN transition (Policy brief), 2025 +
- Research Ethics in a Global Environment +
- Research Ethics – Official GRAD 5104 Blog - Blogs@VT +
- Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance +
- Research Integrity +
- Research Integrity & Research Ethics: Guidelines of the Austrian Science Funds +
- Research Integrity - Detecting and determining greyscales +
- Research Integrity - Quiz! +
- Research Integrity Practices in Science Europe Member Organizations +
- Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges +
- Research Integrity and Environmental & Climate Responsibilities +
- Research Integrity flashcards +
- Research Integrity in trying times: a scenario on the presentation and dissemination of information +
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series +
- Research Integrity: Sabotage! +
- Research Integrity: the Experience of a Doubting Thomas +
- Research Mentoring: An online module +
- Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News +
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Research Reproducibility +
- Research and scientific integrity policy (2018), National Research Council Canada +
- Research and scientific integrity policy (Canada, 2018) +
- Research by Students +
- Research culture +
- Research culture +
- Research ethics committee conditions: Ethical challenges of researching with poor communities in Malawi +
- Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: Issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC +
