Concept:Activity Stream
From The Embassy of Good Science
Description of concept "Activity Stream"RDF feed
Activity Stream
[[Category:Resource||Guide||Initiative||Instruction||Report||Theme]]
N
- Netherlands +
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity +
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity +
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2018), vsnu, Netherlands Association of Universities of Applied Sciences, De samenwerken organisaties in toegepast onderzoek, NFU, KNAW +
- Netherlands Position Paper on the Recognition and Rewards of Academics +
- Netherlands Standard Evaluation Protocol for Research Assessments +
- Neurogenetics study was unethical says NNI report +
- New Tools and Services for Reproducibility +
- New Zealand Code of Professional Standards and Ethics in Science, Technology, and the Humanities (2019) +
- New claim to authorship of published paper +
- Nine pitfalls of research misconduct +
- Norms of the ECoC +
- Norway +
- Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics +
- Nutrition researcher selling supplements +
O
- OAPEN OA Books Toolkit +
- ORCiD Login +
- ORI Infographics +
- ORI comes down (hard) on Bengu Sezen, Columbia chemist accused of fraud +
- ORI introduction to RCR +
- Objectivity and Incentives +
- Obstructive sleep apnoea +
- OeAWI Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice (2018) +
- Office for Human Research Protections;Short videos about human research protections +
- Office of Science and Technology Policy Memorandum on Open Access (2022), Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) +
- Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India National Policy on Academic Ethics (2024) +
- Official notice published for chem paper slated for retraction in 2011 +
- On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research +
- On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care +
- One PhD student, a retraction, and an unconvincing rebuttal +
- One in six of the papers you cite in a review has been retracted. What do you do? +
- Online Learning Tool for Research Integrity and Image Processing +
- Online Module: Research Misconduct +
- Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review +
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation +
- Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans +
- Open Access - information for researchers (2024) — Swiss National Science Foundation +
- Open Access Policy (2017) — Austrian Science Fund +
- Open Access Policy at Czech Academy of Sciences +
- Open Access in 60 seconds +
- Open Access in Germany (2013), Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung/ Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) +
- Open Research Europe: The new EU open access publishing platform +
- Open Science - A practical guide for early-career researchers (2023), Brinkman, L., Dijk, E., de Jonge, H., Loorbach, N., & Rutten, D. +
- Open Science Manifesto (2019), OSCDnet +
- Open Science Platform (2018), Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (MESTD) +
- Open Science – Policy and Guidance (Research Council of Norway) +
- Open Science, Open Access, FAIR Data +
- Open access policy for IDRC-funded project results (2015), International Development Research Centre (IDRC) +
- Open data: improving transparency, reproducibility and collaboration in science +
- Open learning research ethics +
- Open science and research leads to surprising discoveries and creative insights (2014), Ministry of Education and Culture +
- Open science and research leads to surprising discoveries and creative insights (2014), Ministry of Education and Culture +
- Open science outlook 1: status and trends around the world +
- Open-ended constructed-response question_Amber Wutich +
- Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System +
- Organizing Academic Research Papers: Limitations of the Study +
- Organizing the training +
- Orta Yol +
- Ousted: Rule-Breaking Lundbeck CEO and Novartis Scientist Get the Boot +
- Outcomes assessment of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research +
- Outsourcing animal experimentation +
- Overview: underserved areas of education in the responsible conduct of research: authorship +
- Oviedo Convention +
P
- P-Values on Trial: Selective Reporting of (Best Practice Guides Against) Selective Reporting +
- PATTERN +
- PERITIA +
- POIESIS +
- POIESIS Policy Recommendations for Promoting Trust in Science through Integrity, Integration, and Communication +
- POIESIS Recommendations 1, 2, 3: Research Integrity and the Organisation of Science +
- POIESIS Recommendations 4, 5, 6: Societal Integration and Public Engagement in Science +
- POIESIS Recommendations 7, 8, 9: Science Communication and Chains of Mediation +
- PRBB Code of Good Scientific Practice +
- PREPARED +
- PREPARED Guidance for Fair and Fast Desk Assessment of Submitted Manuscripts during Times of Crisis +
- PREPARED Kick-Off Webinar +
- PREPARED Paris Meeting Webinar +
- PREPARED Recommendations for Expediting Ethics Review during Times of Crisis +
- PREPARED SeeSaw +
- PREPARED: Doing Research in Times of Crisis +
- PRINTEGER +
- PRINTEGER +
- PRO-RES +
- Path2Integrity +
- Path2Integrity "RI in Curricula" map +
- Path2Integrity Campaign +
- Path2Integrity Handbooks for Teachers and Trainers +
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty +
- Path2Integrity Learning Cards +
- Path2Integrity Online Learning Environment +
- PathOS +
- Paxil Study Under Fire +
- Payment in different contexts: How can payment reflect local considerations? +
- Payments to young researchers in Malawi +
- Peer Review. The nuts and bolts +
- Peer review +
- Peer review +
- Peer review +
- Peer review card exchange game +
- Peer-mentored research development meeting: a model for successful peer mentoring among junior level researchers +
- People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society +
- Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience +
- Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct +
- PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven) +
- Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism +
- Philosophical Justifications for Human Subjects Research +
- Pillar 1: Embodying Sustainability Values +
- Pirated Idea for Research +
- Plagiarism Charge for Romanian Minister +
- Plagiarism and Fabrication in Public Health Research at Harvard +
- Plagiarism charge for Romanian minister - Scandal adds to fears that country’s research reform is in peril +
- Plagiarism in a PhD Thesis +
- Plagiarism scandal grows in Iran +
- Plagiarism, Voluntary Settlement Agreements and Public Health Service Grants +
- Plain Language Summaries of Publications Toolkit +
- Planetary Health, Part 2: Climate, Gender,& Intersectionality +
- Planetary health, human well-being and environmental justice +
- Planetary health: Connecting Climate, Health, and Power Podcast +
- Plastic waste final quiz +
- Platforma za otvorenu nauku (2018), Ministry of Education Science and Technological Development (MESTD) +
- Podcast +
- Podcasting as a tool for responsible research communication +
- Policy Brief 1: Glossary for Academic Integrity +
- Policy Brief on excellent science communication for urgent societal challenges +
- Policy Statement on Open Access for Publications from Publicly Funded Research Projects Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (2014), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) +
- Policy brief “AI Ethics from Principles to Practice” +
- Policy brief “Ethical challenges of AI companions” +
- Policy documents of the German Rectors’ Conference (HRK) +
- Policy on Ethics and Scientific Integrity (2014), Agence Nationale de la Recherche +
- Policy on Open Access (2017) — NordForsk +
- Policy on Open Access (2017) — NordForsk +
- Policy on open access to research publications (2019), the Federation of Finnish Learned Societies (TSV) +
- Policy statement on ensuring research integrity in Ireland (2020), National Research Integrity Forum +
- Polish Code of Ethics for Research Workers +
- Polish Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies' Good Scientific Research Practice Recommendations +
- Polish National Science Centre Code on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing +
- Political points +
- Política Nacional de Ciencia Abierta 2022- 2031 (2022), Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación +
- Política de acceso abierto a la información científica y a atos de investigación financiados con fondos públicos de la ANID (2022), Chilean National Agency for Research and Development +
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers +
- Population Health Data Implementation Guide (Deliverable 7.1) +
- Portuguese National Council of Ethics for the Life Sciences Recommendation on Integrity in Scientific Research +
- Position Paper on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Austria +
- Position statement of the UKRIO: Statutory regulation of research integrity +
- Possible Conflict of Interest +
- Possible omission of information essential for conclusions in a research paper +
- Postdoc randomly chose data during figure assembly +
- Potential figure manipulation with corresponding author uncontactable +
- Power to the People +
- PowerPoint presentation: From disconnection to planetary stewardship +
- Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management +
- Practical actions +
- Practical actions for sustainable labs +
- Practical tools and strategies for researchers to increase replicability +
- Practicing Reflection in Dialogue +
- Pratiquer une recherche intègre et responsable - Conducting Ethical and Responsible Research – Guidelines (2017), CNRS Ethics Committee (62. ChatGPT translated French Code, p. 1) +
- Precision medicine – future? +
- Premature release of clinical trials data +
- Preparatory Reading: Introduction to Concepts & Themes +
- Preparatory Viewing: Introduction to Concepts & Themes +
- Prepared_Healthy Volunteers and Human Challenge Studies +
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers +
- Preparing whistleblowers for reporting research misconduct +
- Preprint servers +
- Preprints. Instructions for Authors +
- Pressure to disclose confidential research findings +
- Prevention of research misconduct in open science +
- Printeger Upright +
- Privacy +
- Procedures of the Science Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences +
- Procrastinating Researcher Delegates Grant Reviews to Trainee +
- Procrastinating Reviewer +
- Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction +
- Promoting Integrity as an Integral Dimension of Excellence in Research (Policy brief) +
- Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd +
- Prompt cards - Environmental justice in practice +
- Protecting Research Subjects +
- Protecting an endangered species: training physicians to conduct clinical research. +
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis +
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis regarding logothetis vs. shmuel and leopold +
- Protecting research subjects +
- Protection of Research Participants +
- Protection of Research Participants - Case Study +
- Protection of research participants (test) +
- Protocol Violations Putting Animal Subjects in Harm’s Way +
- Psychologist made up sex bias results +
- Psychologist made up sex bias results +
- Psychology Grad Student Faked Data +
- Psychology of misbehavior (in Dutch) +
- Public Health Practice vs Research +
- Publication +
- Publication and data ownership +
- Publication planning: promoting an ethics of transparency and integrity in biomedical research +
- Publication/Authorship +
- Publishing complications and patient safety +
- Publishing your research open access (2020) , Swedish Research Council +
- Putting actions into practice +
- Putting citizens at the centre of research and innovation- Policy brief +
- Putting the 9Rs to Work: Your Circularity Blueprint +
Q
- Qualitative research +
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education +
- Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education +
- Quality History Education in the 21st Century Principles and Guidelines +
- Quality of research outputs and data sets +
- Quality of research outputs and data sets -- Case study +
- Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting +
- Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration +
- Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection +
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design +
- Questioning a Mentor +
- Quiz Open Science +
- Quiz RE and RI +
- Quiz publishing science +
- Quiz: Understanding Climate Mainstreaming +
R
- RCR Casebook +
- RCR online course: build an online course to augment RCR training using evidenced-based learning theory +
- RDA Endorsed Recommendations & Outputs +
- RE4GREEN +
- REI leadership training SLIDES +
- REI leadership training posters +
- RETHINK +
- RID-SSISS +
- ROSIE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science (2023), Responsible Open Science in Europe (ROSiE) +
- ROSiE +
- ROSiE Case Study: Prevention of research misconduct in open science +
- ROSiE Case Study: Quality of research outputs and data sets +
- ROSiE Case Study: Risks to environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems +
- ROSiE Field-Specific Guidelines on Responsible Open Science +
- ROSiE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science +
- ROSiE Test Ethical and societal foundations of open science +
- ROSiE Test: Conflict of interests +
- ROSiE Test: Ethical and societal foundations of open science +
- ROSiE Test: Ethical aspects of citizen science +
- ROSiE Test: Ethical aspects of citizen science +
- ROSiE Test: Protection of research participants rights in open science +
- ROSiE Test: Protection of research participants rights in open science +
- ROSiE Test: Quality of data +
- ROSiE Test: Risks to environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems +
- ROSiE Vide Lectures: Case study for Lecture 2.2: Conflict of interest +
- ROSiE Video Lectures +
- ROSiE Video Lectures Lecture 1.1. Emerging, History & Justifications of Open Science +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 7.2. +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Studies for Lecture 5.2 +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 3.2 +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 3.2 +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 3.3. Data privacy in natural sciences +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 4.2. +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 6.2. +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case Study for Lecture 8.1. +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Case study for Lecture 1.3 +
- ROSiE Video Lectures: Lecture 1.2. Benefits and Value of Open Science for Different Stakeholders (Rosemarie Barnabe) +
