- 08:20, 26 May 2020 diff hist +49 Head of research integrity initiative in China alleged of reseach misconduct
- 08:17, 26 May 2020 diff hist +62 3 Ways to Blow the Whistle
- 08:15, 26 May 2020 diff hist +291 A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data
- 08:04, 26 May 2020 diff hist -18 3 Ways to Blow the Whistle
- 12:02, 25 May 2020 diff hist +265 The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition
- 11:51, 25 May 2020 diff hist +52 Declaration of Helsinki
- 11:48, 25 May 2020 diff hist +69 Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
- 11:42, 25 May 2020 diff hist +27 Czech Code of Ethics for Researchers
- 11:39, 25 May 2020 diff hist +617 Polish Code of Ethics for Research Workers
- 10:28, 25 May 2020 diff hist +175 Whistleblower protection/rights
- 10:24, 25 May 2020 diff hist +89 Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials
- 10:22, 25 May 2020 diff hist +310 The impact of the GDPR on scientific data
- 10:20, 25 May 2020 diff hist +202 Supervision
- 10:19, 25 May 2020 diff hist +272 Standards of authorship
- 10:13, 25 May 2020 diff hist +383 Retractions: correcting the scientific literature
- 10:10, 25 May 2020 diff hist +245 Research with humans
- 10:08, 25 May 2020 diff hist +144 Research with animals
- 10:06, 25 May 2020 diff hist +248 Research metrics
- 09:56, 25 May 2020 diff hist +306 Research integrity training for PhD students
- 09:51, 25 May 2020 diff hist +159 Research integrity officers in Europe
- 15:08, 24 May 2020 diff hist +83 Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas
- 14:56, 24 May 2020 diff hist +230 Research Integrity Advisors
- 14:51, 24 May 2020 diff hist +114 Research Integrity Committees
- 14:19, 24 May 2020 diff hist +307 Publishers - COPE guidelines
- 14:16, 24 May 2020 diff hist +135 Prospective registration of clinical trials
- 14:05, 24 May 2020 diff hist +264 Privacy in research
- 14:02, 24 May 2020 diff hist +279 Post-publication peer review
- 13:58, 24 May 2020 diff hist +46 Peer review card game
- 13:56, 24 May 2020 diff hist +221 Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science
- 13:48, 24 May 2020 diff hist +236 Open access publishing: the new norm?
- 13:43, 24 May 2020 diff hist +159 Legal rights of accused scientists
- 13:33, 24 May 2020 diff hist +144 Journal Impact Factor
- 13:23, 24 May 2020 diff hist +160 Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct
- 11:08, 23 May 2020 diff hist +143 Informed consent
- 13:27, 22 May 2020 diff hist +215 Informed assent
- 13:23, 22 May 2020 diff hist +276 High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations
- 13:20, 22 May 2020 diff hist +125 H-index
- 13:18, 22 May 2020 diff hist +148 Funders
- 13:15, 22 May 2020 diff hist +206 FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results
- 13:11, 22 May 2020 diff hist +68 Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity
- 12:45, 22 May 2020 diff hist +113 The Dilemma Game
- 12:40, 22 May 2020 diff hist +190 Cross-boundary collaborations
- 12:37, 22 May 2020 diff hist +68 Confidentiality
- 12:35, 22 May 2020 diff hist +144 Collaborative working
- 12:22, 22 May 2020 diff hist +76 Balancing harms and benefits
- 12:18, 22 May 2020 diff hist +138 Authorship criteria
- 12:15, 22 May 2020 diff hist -61 Altmetrics
- 12:13, 22 May 2020 diff hist +116 Altmetrics
- 14:05, 18 May 2020 diff hist +1,385 Traver paper: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion
- 13:59, 18 May 2020 diff hist +806 The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research
