Goal (Instruction Goal)
From The Embassy of Good Science
0
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
A
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar, katılımcılara (yüz yüze) grup oturumları arasında yapılması gereken çalışmaları nasıl organize edecekleri hususunda bilgi vermektedir. +
Bu modülde, araştırma doğruluğuyla ilgili genel ilkelere giriş yapılmakta, Araştırmalarda Dürüstlük Konusunda Avrupa Davranış Kodu (ECoC)’nun çizdiği kılavuz niteliğindeki çerçeve açıklanmakta ve sizden ECoC’u kendi karşılaştığınız durumlara uyarlamanız istenmektedir. +
C
After completing this module learners will be able to: a) Understand the concept of conflict of interest and how to deal with it, and b) Recognise and disclose financial and non-financial conflicts of interest in the context of citizen science. +
D
This exercise helps participants to identify the features of, and differences between, debate and dialogue. Participants become aware of the strengths of dialogue as a tool for reflection processes. +
Diese Übung hilft den Teilnehmenden, die Merkmale und Unterschiede zwischen einer Debatte und einem Dialog zu erkennen. Sie lernen, dass der Dialog ein wertvolles Werkzeug für Reflexionsprozesse ist. +
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar, katılımcılara VIRT2UE eğitiminin ikinci (yüz yüze) grup oturumu için nasıl hazırlanacakları ve bu oturumda neler yapacakları hususunda bilgi vermektedir. +
''Kann man zu ehrlich sein?'' Diese Übung hilft den Teilnehmenden, moralische Sensibilität in Bezug auf jene Werte und Tugenden zu entwickeln, die grundlegend im Zusammenhang mit Research Integrity stehen. Die Übung fördert insbesondere die Reflexion über die moralische Ambiguität, die bestimmten Werten und Tugenden innewohnt. +
Diese Übung fördert die Reflexion über das Konzept des Guten und dessen Anwendung im wissenschaftlichen Kontext +
The “Diner Pensant – Tasteful conversations to empower good practices in science” is a workshop method to promote a ''food for thought'' critical reflection about good and bad scientific practices, in a relaxing, interactive, and enjoyable atmosphere. +
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar, sizi VIRT2UE araştırma doğruluğu karma öğrenme programının ilk (yüz yüze) grup oturumlarına hazırlamaktadır. +
E
Bu modülde, erdem etiği konusuna giriş yapılmakta ve erdem etiğinin araştırma doğruluğuyla olan ilişkisi üzerinde durulmaktadır. Eğitimi alan kişilerden, yeni edindikleri bilgilerle ilgili olarak kendilerini değerlendirmeleri, öğrenilen kavramları interaktif alıştırmalarda kullanmaları ya da daha önceki deneyimlerine dayanarak bu kavramların kendi günlük araştırma pratikleriyle olan ilişkisi üzerine fikir yürütmeleri ve yorumlamalarda bulunmaları istenmektedir. +
Bu alıştırma, erdemlerin eylem normları ile ilişkilendirilerek gerçek yaşamda karşılaşılan ikilemlerde uygulanması için farklı yöntemlerin geliştirilmesine ve gerçek bir RI ikileminin diyalog yoluyla farklı perspektiflerden yorumlanmasına yardımcı olmaktadır. +
Via this module learners gain an understanding of the principles and values of open science, including its ethical foundations and societal benefits. +
Burada bulunan talimatlar size bir VIRT2UE eğitimini organize ederken takip etmeniz gereken adımlara ilişkin genel bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. +
I
This course aims to empower students with knowledge that underlies principles of accuracy, honesty, reproducibility, responsibility and transparency. +
After completing this section of the course you will:
* Have learned more about the various types and spread of Image Manipulation in research.
* Have learned why it is considered a serious research misconduct.
* Have practiced spotting some examples of Image Manipulation for yourself. +
Integrity Games is a research based learning platform on academic integrity. It is designed to spark interest, reflection and learning through four gamified cases and a library of central concepts. +
These instructions provide information on how to organize the work in between (face to face) group sessions. +
This series of eLearning modules provides an introduction to virtue ethics, and highlights the relevance of virtue ethics for research integrity. Learners are invited to self-assess newly gained knowledge, relate and apply the concepts in reflexive exercises, or reflect on the relevance of these concepts for their daily research practice by drawing upon their prior experience. +
This series of eLearning modules provides an introduction to the main principles of research integrity, describes the guidance outlined in the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ECoC), and asks you to apply the ECoC to your own context. +
This series of eLearning modules highlights the relevance of supervision, mentoring, and role-modeling in research environments and provides definitions of roles and their corresponding responsibilities. +
The objectives of the first section of this guide are:
*Knowing which principles are essential to ethically evaluate human subjects research
*Knowing the principles mentioned in the Declaration of Helsinki
*Being able to discern differences between the formulations of principles in international ethical guidance documents
*Being able to weigh and balance ethical principles in a concrete situation +
K
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar size VIRT2UE eğitiminde üzerinde durulan kavram ve konulara aşinalık kazanmanızı sağlayacak okuma ve ödevlere ilişkin genel bilgiler sunmaktadır. +
M
The MOOC course aims at helping PhD candidates to overcome common difficulties in the area of research integrity and to provide ideas on how to become a responsible researcher, who feels empowered by knowledge of integrity. +
Bu modülde halihazırda hâkim olan araştırma kültürünün, erdem etiği yaklaşımını baltalayacak koşullar oluşturabileceği ve araştırmacıların ahlaki açıdan uygun olmayan davranışlar geliştirmesine yol açabileceği yönündeki kaygıların üzerinde durulacaktır. +
This exercise supports participants in identifying research integrity principles, virtues and questionable research practices in a hypothetical case. It provides a framework to consider, choose and defend alternative courses of action regarding realistic research integrity dilemmas. +
Bu alıştırma, katılımcıların münazara ve diyalog yöntemlerinin ayırt edici özelliklerini ve bu iki yöntem arasındaki farkları anlamalarına ve fikir yürütme süreçlerinde kullanılan bir araç olarak diyaloğun kuvvetli ve kullanışlı yanlarını fark etmelerine yardımcı olmaktadır. +
Bu alıştırma, katılımcıların münazara ve diyalog yöntemlerinin ayırt edici özelliklerini ve bu iki yöntem arasındaki farkları anlamalarına ve fikir yürütme süreçlerinde kullanılan bir araç olarak diyaloğun kuvvetli ve kullanışlı yanlarını fark etmelerine yardımcı olmaktadır. +
Bu alıştırma, katılımcıların münazara ve diyalog yöntemlerinin ayırt edici özelliklerini ve bu iki yöntem arasındaki farkları anlamalarına ve fikir yürütme süreçlerinde kullanılan bir araç olarak diyaloğun kuvvetli ve kullanışlı yanlarını fark etmelerine yardımcı olmaktadır. +
O
This instruction provides you with an overview of all the necessary steps that you will need to take to organize a VIRT2UE training. +
''Gereğinden fazla dürüst olmak diye bir şey mümkün müdür?'' Bu alıştırma, araştırma doğruluğu (AD) ile alakalı temel erdemlere ilişkin ahlaki duyarlılık geliştirmeye yardımcı olmaktadır. Bu alıştırmada özellikle belirli erdemlerin doğasında var olan ahlaki muğlaklık ve bu muğlaklığın somut araştırma pratiklerinde kendini nasıl gösterdiği üzerinde durulmaktadır. +
P
The objectives of this section are:
*Knowing main theories on philosophical justification of human subjects research
*Being able to argue whether and under what conditions the well-being of research participants must always take precedence over scientific interests
*Knowing how to evaluate Tuskegee from an historical perspective
*Knowing some historical scandals and cases which have led to the practice of ethically reflecting on human subjects research
*Evaluating the moral aspects of Tuskegee +
These instructions prepare you to experience the first (face to face) group sessions of the VIRT2UE blended learning program on research integrity. +
These instructions provide an overview of the readings and assignments introducing the concepts and issues addressed in the VIRT2UE training. +
The VIRT2UE project has developed videos introducing the concept of Research Integrity. These are available on [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_tr-rcbm3VwuL4jcpUZkDA The Embassy youtube channel.] +
After completing this module learners will be able to: a) Identify potential risks to human research participants within the context of citizen science, and b) Understand strategies to minimize risks to research participants when practising citizen science. +
Q
After completing this module learners will be able to understand the importance of the quality of data sets and research outputs and their responsible use in open science. +
R
After receiving your certificate, you will receive an invitation to register as a Research Integrity expert on the [https://eneri.eu/e-community/ ENERI] e-Community so you can be easily identified as a VIRT2UE trainer. +
These instructions provide you with information on how to prepare and experience the second (face to face) group session of the VIRT2UE training. +
Introducing the viewer to core challenges and issues related to research response in times of crises. +
The goal of this course is that PhD candidates learn how and why supervision, mentoring and collaboration are key ingredients to support Responsible Conduct in Research (RCR). At the end of the course PhD candidates will be better prepared to recognize and constructively deal with challenges that they can face when collaborating with others during their PhD research. +
After completing this module learners will be able to: a) Comprehend the role of citizen science in identifying and addressing scientific problems and societal challenges, and b) Recognize the right of citizen scientists to be acknowledged by academic scientists and society. +
After completing this module learners will be able to: a) Understand the risks to the environment, plants, animals, and ecosystems in the context of citizen science and b) Understand how to minimize risks to the environment, plants, animals, and ecosystems when practising citizen science. +
S
The Data in responsible conduct of research course is designed to highlight which integrity issues can rise during a research project and to promote RCR. +
