Goal (Instruction Goal)
From The Embassy of Good Science
T
''Can you be too honest?'' This exercise helps to develop moral sensitivity with respect to basic virtues related to research integrity. In particular, it fosters reflection on the inherent moral ambiguity of specific virtues and how this ambiguity looks like in real-life research practice. +
The "PREPARED Seesaw" is an online interactive pandemic ethics initiative. The aim of the activity is to enable the public to experience the difficulty of making decisions pertaining to pandemic ethics. +
This micromodule focuses on AI’s environmental impact. From energy-hungry data centers to e-waste and water use, this micromodule explores AI’s footprint and what people can do about it. Participants will explore both the opportunities and risks of AI in the environmental context and begin to imagine what a more sustainable AI future could look like. By the end of this micromodule, participants will be able to:
*'''Identify''' key environmental impacts of AI technologies
*'''Explain''' how AI’s infrastructure contributes to climate and environmental pressures
*'''Reflect''' on trade-offs and future governance needs regarding AI deployment +
This micromodule outlines how environmental and climate ethical considerations play a role in the different stages of research and innovation projects. By the end of the micromodule, participants will be able to:
* '''Understand''' the rationale for an approach to research ethics that incorporates environmental ethics dimensions.
* '''Reflect''' on what it means to be an environmentally virtuous researcher in one’s own specific field.
* '''Relate''' environmental dimensions of research and innovation to various stages of professional practice and act accordingly. +
Learn about the Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy (Biggs & Collins, 1982) and its derived instruments (ECAG (Ethical Case Assessment Grid) and EASM (Ethical Awareness and Sensitivity Meter)) and how they can be used to evaluate understanding and ethical sensitivity in the context of Research Ethics and Integrity (REI) teaching, learning, and assessment. +
<span lang="EN-GB">This resource is meant to support educators in organizing training activities on sustainability and Eco‑Justice in Everyday Research. It builds on the content developed for the corresponding course.</span> +
This module introduces different '''trainings''' on '''research ethics''' and '''research integrity''' developed by EU funded initiatives for a range of different target groups and topics. +
<span lang="EN-US">This micromodule builds on the content of the first episode of Earth to Research, ) to explore what it means to do transformative research in times of ecological and social crisis. By the end of this micromodule, researchers will be able to:</span>
* <span lang="EN-US">'''Explain the concept of transformative research'''—including how research can contribute not only to knowledge production but to societal change.</span>
* <span lang="EN-US">'''Describe''' the PePe framework (Pluralizing, Empowering, Politicizing, Embedding) and its relevance for advancing more just and impactful research practices.</span>
* '''<span lang="EN-US">Apply</span>''' the PEPE <span lang="EN-US">framework to their own research practices and systems.</span>
* '''Critically evaluate''' their role as researchers, including ethical responsibilities, boundary work, and potential influence on change. +
<span lang="EN-US">This micromodule, inspired by the podcast T[https://open.spotify.com/episode/2Yq8FQTN5tX789DJwwSrmI?si=WUKgA52dS9WjZ-Llt98E8A ransformative Research, Part 2: Emotions & Justice], explores the emotional and justice-oriented dimensions of research. After completing this micromodules learners will be able to:</span>
*'''<span lang="EN-US">Identify</span>''' <span lang="EN-US">ethical tensions in their own research ecosystems by reflecting on who benefits, who pays the price and what is left unseen or unaddressed</span>
*'''<span lang="EN-US">Use</span>''' <span lang="EN-US">imagination and analogy as tools to surface inner dynamics, silenced voices, and neglected consequences in research systems and practices.</span>
*'''<span lang="EN-US">Critically</span>''' <span lang="EN-US">evaluate their role as researchers not only as knowledge producers but as moral and political actors.</span> +
The VIRT2UE materials are CC BY 4.0 licensed. We encourage you to use them, adapt them, and translate them into your own language.
On this page we provide instructions about how to translate the subtitles of the VIRT2UE e-learning modules.
Each course comprises of one ore more eLearning modules, of which links to documents containing the subtitles are listed separately. +
The VIRT2UE materials are CC BY 4.0 licensed. We encourage you to use them, adapt them, and translate them into your own language.
On this page we provide instructions about how to translate the VIRT2UE training guide. +
The '''''Global Code of Conduct for Equitable Research Partnerships''','' also known as the '''TRUST Code''', was developed to address “ethics dumping”, where researchers conduct studies in low- or middle-income settings that would be unethical or prohibited in high-income countries
Its ensures research is grounded in the core values of fairness, respect, care, and honesty and has become a mandatory reference document for recipients of EU funding and has been adopted by research institutions all around the world.
The interactive Trust Code Training aims to educate researchers and research stakeholders on the ethical foundations and recommendations of the TRUST Code, ultimately fostering equitable global research collaborations. +
U
This module provides guidance on how to use the '''Bloom''', '''SOLO''' and '''Significant Learning (Fink's)''' taxonomies for the creation of effective and impactful learning objectives. +
This module introduces a collection of learning cards developed by the EU funded initiative Path2Integrity, which can be used as an interactive tool to teach research ethics and integrity. +
Bu alıştırma, katılımcıların bir vaka bağlamında araştırma doğruluğu (AD) ile ilgili prensipleri, erdemleri ve kusurlu davranışları belirleyebilmesine yardımcı olmakta ve araştırma doğruluğuyla ilgili olarak ortaya çıkabilecek gerçekçi ikilemlerle karşı karşıya kalındığında benimsenecek alternatif eylem tarzlarını düşünme, seçme ve savunma olanağı veren bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. +
V
[https://zenodo.org/records/16992751 The Scenario-Building Training] aims to make [https://zenodo.org/records/16975899 VERITY’s Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science] more actionable and transformative, supporting their clarity, relevance and feasibility. The training offers a step-by-step methodological tool for exploring how specific VERITY recommendations can be applied in real-life individual, institutional or policy contexts.
It can also be used outside the VERITY project, as a flexible resource for exploring the practical implementation of recommendations in other contexts.
Authors: Pamela Bartar & Gábor Szüdi (Centre for Social Innovation, ZSI) +
These instructions provide information on how to obtain the VIRT2UE training certificate. +
The VIRT2UE project has developed videos demonstrating the participation exercises. These are available on [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_tr-rcbm3VwuL4jcpUZkDA The Embassy youtube channel.] +
A number of videos have been developed by the VIRT2UE project. These are available on [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_tr-rcbm3VwuL4jcpUZkDA/featured The Embassy YouTube channel] +
Varieties of goodness in research - a rotary style exercise (variation to original VIRT2UE exercise)) +
See the original version of the exercise. +
