User contributions
From The Embassy of Good Science
- 10:33, 9 March 2023 diff hist +142 The Dilemma Game current
- 09:45, 21 September 2021 diff hist +1,310 Criticism Swirls Around High-Profile History Book about North Korea current
- 14:18, 28 January 2021 diff hist +152 3 things societies can do to promote research integrity current
- 12:54, 10 December 2020 diff hist +1 Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students current
- 12:52, 10 December 2020 diff hist -1 Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students
- 12:51, 10 December 2020 diff hist -16 Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students
- 12:49, 10 December 2020 diff hist +166 Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students
- 11:35, 10 December 2020 diff hist +85 Research culture survey (University of Glasgow)
- 16:36, 27 October 2020 diff hist +1,160 Protecting research subjects
- 16:35, 27 October 2020 diff hist -1,070 Research with humans
- 12:03, 27 October 2020 diff hist -12 Protecting research subjects
- 16:11, 26 October 2020 diff hist -26 Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges current
- 16:10, 26 October 2020 diff hist +13 What is Recklessness in Scientific Research? current
- 16:09, 26 October 2020 diff hist -1,253 Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct
- 16:07, 26 October 2020 diff hist -903 The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research
- 16:06, 26 October 2020 diff hist -835 The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach
- 16:06, 26 October 2020 diff hist -925 Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India
- 16:03, 26 October 2020 diff hist -83 Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched
- 16:03, 26 October 2020 diff hist -918 The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’
- 16:01, 26 October 2020 diff hist -882 Mea Culpa: Scientific Misconduct - perspective of a research ethics board chair
- 15:59, 26 October 2020 diff hist -165 Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility current
- 15:55, 26 October 2020 diff hist -461 Research fraud on MMR vaccines current
- 15:52, 26 October 2020 diff hist -177 Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel
- 15:52, 26 October 2020 diff hist -457 Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent
- 15:51, 26 October 2020 diff hist -18 Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines current
- 15:51, 26 October 2020 diff hist -350 Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines
- 14:58, 23 October 2020 diff hist +76 Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials
- 14:58, 23 October 2020 diff hist +304 Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials
- 14:52, 23 October 2020 diff hist -52 Supervision
- 14:49, 23 October 2020 diff hist -2 Spin of research results
- 14:48, 23 October 2020 diff hist -46 Self-plagiarism
- 14:46, 23 October 2020 diff hist +84 Science policy
- 14:44, 23 October 2020 diff hist +23 Salami publication
- 14:42, 23 October 2020 diff hist -4 Responsible supervision
- 12:32, 23 October 2020 diff hist -3 Research with animals
- 12:31, 23 October 2020 diff hist -3 Research metrics
- 12:29, 23 October 2020 diff hist -4 Research integrity officers in Europe
- 12:29, 23 October 2020 diff hist 0 Research integrity officers in Europe
- 12:26, 23 October 2020 diff hist -47 Research ethics committee members' skills
- 12:25, 23 October 2020 diff hist +67 Research ethics committee members' skills
- 12:19, 23 October 2020 diff hist -3 Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors
- 12:11, 23 October 2020 diff hist +913 Post-publication peer review
- 12:04, 23 October 2020 diff hist -3 Perverse incentives current
- 12:04, 23 October 2020 diff hist +4 Perverse incentives
- 11:58, 23 October 2020 diff hist +359 Outcome reporting bias
- 11:29, 23 October 2020 diff hist 0 Open Science
- 11:28, 23 October 2020 diff hist -50 Open Science
- 11:26, 23 October 2020 diff hist +55 Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science
- 11:26, 23 October 2020 diff hist +1,388 Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science
- 10:59, 23 October 2020 diff hist 0 Mertonian norms current
- 10:58, 23 October 2020 diff hist +404 Legal rights of accused scientists
- 22:17, 22 October 2020 diff hist +39 Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations
- 22:16, 22 October 2020 diff hist -34 Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations
- 22:12, 22 October 2020 diff hist -19 Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's
- 22:04, 22 October 2020 diff hist -464 Jesse's Intent
- 22:03, 22 October 2020 diff hist +4 The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research
- 21:56, 22 October 2020 diff hist 0 The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science
- 21:56, 22 October 2020 diff hist -1,323 The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science
- 21:54, 22 October 2020 diff hist +187 Cultural differences and communication in the lab current
- 21:48, 22 October 2020 diff hist -18 Irish National Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity current
- 21:43, 22 October 2020 diff hist -1,036 History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala
- 21:39, 22 October 2020 diff hist +5 The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics?
- 21:39, 22 October 2020 diff hist -1,128 The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics?
- 21:36, 22 October 2020 diff hist +82 Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds
- 21:31, 22 October 2020 diff hist -10 Psychology Grad Student Faked Data
- 21:28, 22 October 2020 diff hist -75 Psychology Grad Student Faked Data
- 21:26, 22 October 2020 diff hist +35 Changing a grant proposal to meet the reviewers requests current
- 16:26, 22 October 2020 diff hist -4 Global Code of Conduct for Research in Resource-Poor Settings
- 11:30, 22 October 2020 diff hist +264 Intellectual conflicts of interest
- 11:30, 22 October 2020 diff hist -263 Intellectual conflicts of interest
- 18:12, 20 October 2020 diff hist +4,433 N Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Good Practices |Title=What are the causes of the variability in research integrity levels? A National Survey on Research Integrity |Is About=The online [ht..."
- 17:59, 20 October 2020 diff hist 0 Journal Impact Factor
- 17:59, 20 October 2020 diff hist +175 Journal Impact Factor
- 17:54, 20 October 2020 diff hist -5 Research culture current
- 17:50, 20 October 2020 diff hist +1,031 Informed assent current
- 17:48, 20 October 2020 diff hist +43 Inappropriate study design
- 17:45, 20 October 2020 diff hist +334 Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)
- 17:41, 20 October 2020 diff hist -17 H-index current
- 17:39, 20 October 2020 diff hist -4 Hostile peer review
- 17:38, 20 October 2020 diff hist +8 H-index
- 17:35, 20 October 2020 diff hist -152 High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations
- 17:20, 20 October 2020 diff hist +1,242 European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)
- 17:18, 20 October 2020 diff hist +2,479 European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)
- 17:15, 20 October 2020 diff hist -10 EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data)
- 17:14, 20 October 2020 diff hist -30 Epistemic virtues
- 17:12, 20 October 2020 diff hist +269 Research integrity training for diverse disciplines
- 17:10, 20 October 2020 diff hist -5 Data stewardship at TU Delft
- 17:07, 20 October 2020 diff hist -1 Conflict of interests current
- 17:06, 20 October 2020 diff hist -4 Conflict of interest in peer review
- 17:06, 20 October 2020 diff hist +195 Confidentiality
- 17:04, 20 October 2020 diff hist -3 Balancing harms and benefits
- 17:03, 20 October 2020 diff hist +46 Balancing harms and benefits
- 17:01, 20 October 2020 diff hist +141 Altmetrics
- 16:11, 20 October 2020 diff hist +4,589 N Keeping inadequate notes of the research process Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Title=Keeping inadequate notes of the research process |Is About=Adequate documentation or ‘note taking’ of the research pro..."
- 16:02, 20 October 2020 diff hist +2,673 N (re)submitting without consent of all authors Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Has Parent Theme=Theme:883697c8-d319-4224-991e-ce063d648efd |Title=(re)submitting without consent of all authors |Is About=Paper..."
- 15:59, 20 October 2020 diff hist +17 Fake peer-reviewing
- 15:58, 20 October 2020 diff hist +5,465 N Fake peer-reviewing Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Has Parent Theme=Theme:883697c8-d319-4224-991e-ce063d648efd |Title=Fake peer-reviewing |Is About=Fake reviewing, or self-reviewi..."
- 15:39, 20 October 2020 diff hist -3 Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions
- 15:38, 20 October 2020 diff hist +3,564 N Unfair reviewing Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Has Parent Theme=Theme:883697c8-d319-4224-991e-ce063d648efd |Title=Unfair reviewing |Is About=Unfair reviewing refers to a revie..."
- 15:35, 20 October 2020 diff hist +4,136 N Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Misconduct & Misbehaviors |Has Parent Theme=Theme:883697c8-d319-4224-991e-ce063d648efd |Title=Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials |Is About..."