User contributions
From The Embassy of Good Science
- 17:43, 27 May 2020 diff hist +136 Research integrity officers in Europe
- 17:43, 27 May 2020 diff hist +213 Research Integrity Advisors
- 17:42, 27 May 2020 diff hist +378 Research integrity training for PhD students
- 17:40, 27 May 2020 diff hist +348 Research ethics committees
- 17:39, 27 May 2020 diff hist +126 Research metrics
- 17:38, 27 May 2020 diff hist +262 Research with animals
- 17:37, 27 May 2020 diff hist +243 Research with humans
- 17:36, 27 May 2020 diff hist +367 Research ethics committee members' skills
- 17:34, 27 May 2020 diff hist +303 Retractions: correcting the scientific literature
- 17:33, 27 May 2020 diff hist -122 Supervision
- 17:32, 27 May 2020 diff hist +288 Supervision
- 17:29, 27 May 2020 diff hist +105 The impact of the GDPR on scientific data
- 17:28, 27 May 2020 diff hist +272 Research Integrity Committees
- 17:27, 27 May 2020 diff hist +108 Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity
- 17:26, 27 May 2020 diff hist +82 Open access publishing: the new norm?
- 17:24, 27 May 2020 diff hist +206 Reasonable standards for career advancement
- 17:23, 27 May 2020 diff hist +100 Publishers - COPE guidelines
- 17:22, 27 May 2020 diff hist +343 Prospective registration of clinical trials
- 17:20, 27 May 2020 diff hist +214 Privacy in research
- 17:17, 27 May 2020 diff hist +109 FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results
- 17:16, 27 May 2020 diff hist +97 Self-plagiarism
- 17:16, 27 May 2020 diff hist +63 Spin of research results
- 17:15, 27 May 2020 diff hist +153 Selective citation
- 17:12, 27 May 2020 diff hist -61 Salami publication
- 17:11, 27 May 2020 diff hist +231 Salami publication
- 17:10, 27 May 2020 diff hist +436 Research misconduct
- 17:06, 27 May 2020 diff hist +92 Post-publication peer review
- 17:04, 27 May 2020 diff hist +432 Peer review card game
- 17:02, 27 May 2020 diff hist +82 Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science
- 17:02, 27 May 2020 diff hist +186 Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors
- 17:01, 27 May 2020 diff hist +219 Publication bias (positive results)
- 16:58, 27 May 2020 diff hist -4 Polarized research
- 16:56, 27 May 2020 diff hist +348 Plagiarism
- 16:52, 27 May 2020 diff hist +223 Perverse incentives
- 16:51, 27 May 2020 diff hist +100 P-value hacking
- 16:44, 27 May 2020 diff hist +115 Outcome reporting bias
- 16:43, 27 May 2020 diff hist +181 Non-reporting of negative findings
- 16:42, 27 May 2020 diff hist +104 Inappropriate study design
- 16:41, 27 May 2020 diff hist +113 Inappropriate study design
- 16:35, 27 May 2020 diff hist +121 Inappropriate authorship
- 16:35, 27 May 2020 diff hist -236 Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)
- 16:33, 27 May 2020 diff hist +147 Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)
- 16:26, 27 May 2020 diff hist +77 Hostile peer review
- 16:25, 27 May 2020 diff hist +67 Gender bias
- 16:24, 27 May 2020 diff hist +199 Falsification
- 16:22, 27 May 2020 diff hist +337 Fabrication
- 16:21, 27 May 2020 diff hist +72 Theme:A22bd155-7f88-4750-aa9c-cba9ad72cbec
- 16:20, 27 May 2020 diff hist +135 Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)
- 16:19, 27 May 2020 diff hist +147 Conflict of interest in peer review
- 16:16, 27 May 2020 diff hist +104 Whistleblower protection/rights