Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism" +
- "Hot" Gifts +
- 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
- 02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
- 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
- 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics +
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Copyright Violation +
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Data Fabrication +
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct +
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (1) +
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2) +
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Redundant Publication +
- A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data +
- A Letter of "Non-Recommendation" +
- A Letter of Resignation +
- A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials +
- A framework for assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: enhancing deliberation as a tool for bioethic +
- A proposal for a model of informed consent for the collection, storage and use of biological materials for research purposes +
- A qualitative approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training development: identification of metacognitive strategies +
- A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals. +
- Academic Affiliation and Research in a Personal Capacity +
- An innovation in teaching ethics to medical students +
- Anonymity Declined +
- Anonymity Revisited +
- Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct +
- Attempting to Assure Accuracy +
- Authors couldn’t find a patient to give consent for case report. Then the patient found the report. +
- Authorship and Intellectual Property +
- Backstage Maneuvers +
- Baltimore Case - In Brief +
- Banked Samples and HD Testing +
- Bias in hiring +
- Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People +
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports +
- Canaries in the Mines: Children, Risk, Non-Therapeutic Research, and Justice +
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage +
- Co-Authorship Conflicts +
- Collaboration dispute +
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Collaborative working +
- Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes +
- Community consultation and public disclosure: preliminary results from a new model +
- Confidentiality +
- Conflicts with Community Leaders +
- Continuing Research and Protecting Confidentiality +
- Cultural differences and communication in the lab +
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Data Sharing +
- Data Sharing and Potential Future Uses +
- Data Sharing, Informed Consent and Confidentiality +
- Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Advice +
- Dispute Over Primary Authorship +
- Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study +
- Eforcement Agencies and the Protection of Human Subjects +
- Ethical Dilemmas and Moral Responsibilities +
- Ethical Issues in Developing Pharmacogenetic Research Partnerships With American Indigenous Communities +
- Ethics Approval, Quarantees of Quality and the Meddlesome Editor +
- Ethics Requirement Score: new tool for evaluating ethics in publications +
- Ethics and children's rights: learning from past mistakes +
- Ethics in educational research: Introducing a methodological tool for effective ethical analysis +
- Ethics, Human Rights and HIV Vaccine Trials in Low-Income Settings +
- European Charter of Patients' Rights +
- European Network of Research Integrity Offices Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct +
- Faculty development: if you build it, they will come +
- False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial +
- Faulty Drug Trials Tarnish Japan's Clinical Research +
- Finnish Guidelines on Doctoral Supervision and Review +
- Five cases considered and concluded by the UK's General Medical Council +
- Five vignettes in speech and language research +
- Forbidden Knowledge +
- Former Columbia University Graduate Student Engaged in 21 Instances of Research Misconduct +
- Fostering integrity in postgraduate research: an evidence-based policy and support framework +
- Fraudulent algorithm: A pain too deep for adequate analgesia +
- Global Code of Conduct for Research in Resource-Poor Settings +
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Austria +
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland +
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Switzerland +
- Guidelines for Responsible Data Management in Scientific Research +
- HEADT Centre: An Introduction to Research Integrity +
- Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale +
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values +
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values +
- Harvard Scientists Disciplined for Not Declaring Ties to Drug Companies +
- Hazardous materials +
- Herbicide Resistant Rice +
- Hiding A Suspect +
- Hiding A Suspect +
- History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala +
- Honest refereeing +
- How Earnest Research Into Gay Genetics Went Wrong +
- Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects +
- Informal Surveys for Policy and Planning that "Trigger" Research Projects +
- Informed Consent with Pre-Testing Convenience Samples +
- Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man +
- Integrating a peer-taught module on practical research ethics into the graduate student orientation curriculum +
- Intellectual Rights Involving Multiple Institutions +
- Jailed for Faking Data +
- Jesse's Intent +
- Journal calls 2012 paper “deeply offensive to particular minorities” +
- Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America +
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes +
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes +
- Linking Data Sets +
- Mentoring International Post Docs +
- Mentoring: disabilities +
- Mentoring: lack of interest +
- Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies +
- Mistaken Claim of Authorship +
- Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations +
- Neurogenetics study was unethical says NNI report +
- Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics +
- Obstructive sleep apnoea +
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation +
- Outsourcing animal experimentation +
- Peer review +
- Pirated Idea for Research +
- Plagiarism and Fabrication in Public Health Research at Harvard +
- Plagiarism in a PhD Thesis +
- Plagiarism, Voluntary Settlement Agreements and Public Health Service Grants +
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers +
- Possible Conflict of Interest +
- Power to the People +
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers +
- Printeger Upright +
- Privacy +
- Protecting Research Subjects +
- Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis +
- Protecting research subjects +
- Protocol Violations Putting Animal Subjects in Harm’s Way +
- Public Health Practice vs Research +
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Publishing complications and patient safety +
- Questioning a Mentor +
- Rainy Days for a Struggling Mentee +
- Reaction to bias +
- Records From Controversial Twin Study Sealed at Yale Until 2065 +
- Reflections on the Cleveland Clinic Study of The Batista Operation +
- Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering +
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Research Integrity - Detecting and determining greyscales +
- Research Integrity: Podcast Series +
- Research Integrity: Sabotage! +
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Research by Students +
- Research culture +
- Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study +
- Research misconduct in a grant application for the National Institutes of Health +
- Research or Services? +
- Research with human subjects +
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC +
- Researcher discovers paper published by co-author in another journal +
- Researchers Pressured to Store Animal Subjects +
- Resident physician plagiarises publications supported by 10 National Institutes of Health grants +
- Respondent Confidentiality +
- Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report +
- Responsible conduct in research +
- Responsible mentoring +
- Responsible science: vol. 1 +
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols +
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Rights to Authorship +
- Robbers, Rogues or Revolutionaries: Handling Armed Intimidation +
- Robbing the Grave: Investigator Takes Ownership of Deceased Scholar’s Work +
- Sabotage and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct +
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- Scandalous behaviour at Medical University of Innsbruck +
- Science and Surveillance: Western Institutions Consider Role in China’s Uighur Crackdown +
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study +
- Serious Accusation of Negligence of Ethical Principles in Human Sciences +
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Instant Paper +
- Site Unseen +
- Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research +
- Slow Code +
- Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India +
- Studying Vulnerable Individuals +
- Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity r +
- Teaching the Ethical Principles of Psychology +
- Team-based learning instruction for responsible conduct of research positively impacts ethical decision-making +
- Technician Error Leads to Harm of Animal Subjects +
- Ten short cases on publication ethics +
- The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field +
- The BIAS FREE Framework: a new analytical tool for global health research +
- The Case of Falsified Data +
- The Case of the Damaged Baby +
- The Case of the Egyptian Travel Agent +
- The Case of the Missing Artefact +
- The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers +
- The Ethics of Collecting Genetic Data From Indigenous People +
- The Ethics of Public Health Research on Less Expensive, Less Effective Interventions +
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity +
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition +
- The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’ +
- The Ghost Collaborator +
- The Hazardous Consent Forms +
- The Lab: Avoiding Research Misconduct +
- The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences +
- The Nuremberg Code +
- The Nutty Professor +
- The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics? +
- The RESPECT Code of Practice for Socioeconomic Research +
- The Runaway Wife +
- The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research +
- The Suspect Questionnaire +
- The Three Rs of Animal Research +
- The Unfortunate Experiment +
- The University of Malta's Research Code of Practice +
- The Use of Students as Participants in a Study of Eating Disorders in a Developing Country: Case Study in the Ethics of Mental Health Research +
- The Wild West of Animal Experimentation +
- The publication of controversial views +
- The value of respect in human research ethics: a conceptual analysis and a practical guide +
- To Accept or Not to Accept +
- To Medicate or Not to Medicate +
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
- UNE in Row Over Bullying Survey +
- University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions +
- Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations +
- Using student generated codes of conduct in the classroom to reinforce business ethics education +
- Valley of Sorrow +
- Vulnerable Populations +
- Vulnerable Populations +
- What happens when an ex-physicist writes about gender identity? +
- What's in That Bottle? What's in That Pipe? +
- When Sociologists Deceive Their Subjects +
- When is Advanced Training Necessary? +
- Who Owns the Field Notes +
- Withholding Study Purpose +
- Witness to Murder +
- Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement +
- Would You Do a Post Doc with this Guy? +
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues +
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues +
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues +
- Collaboration In Research +
- SSH research as part of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research +
- Monitoring funding processes +
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching +
- Networks and projects promoting research integrity +
- Balancing harms and benefits +
- Informed assent +
- Informed consent +
- Research with humans +
- Authorship criteria +
- Consent for publication (Participant) +
- Publishers - COPE guidelines +
- Standards of authorship +
- (re)submitting without consent of all authors +
- Gender bias +
- Hostile peer review +
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports +