Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Sabotage and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct + (Researchers)
- Integrity in scientific research videos + (All stakeholders in research)
- Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans + (PhD students)
- Publishing complications and patient safety + (Research Ethics Committees)
- ENERI Decision Tree + (All stakeholders in research)
- What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds + (Researchers)
- ENERI Classroom + (Research Integrity Officers)
- INTEGRITY High School Research Integrity Course + (High school students)
- PhD-pizza - Gathering for PhD-candidates to talk freely + (phd students)
- Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct +
- Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent +
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel +
- From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark +
- The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research +
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC + (Researchers)
- INSPIRE Checklist + (Policy makers)
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control +
- Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication +
- The qualification portfolio (UMC Utrecht): from output to impact + (Research institutions)
- Grading the quality of evidence in clinical practice guidelines + (Clinical researchers)
- Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's +
- Guideline for discussing work-related stress + (Supervisors)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education + (Supervisors)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of institutional research integrity stakeholders + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of bachelor, master and PhD students + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of post-doctorate and senior researchers + (Research institutions)
- Infographic - SOPs4RI Research integrity education guidelines for research institutions + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture + (Research institutions)
- Guidelines for research institutions on adequate education and skills training + (Research institutions)
- Guidelines for research institutions on managing competition and publication pressure + (Research institutions)
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on diversity and inclusion + (Research institutions)
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine + (Human rights defenders)
- Criminologist to have four papers retracted following months of scrutiny + (Ethics committee members)
- SCImago Journal Rankings + (Academic staff)
- Integrity Games - a research based learning platform on academic integrity aimed at undergraduate university students + (Bachelor students)
- 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (researchers)
- Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials + (researchers)
- Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct + (researchers)
- Austrian Agency for Research Integrity Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice + (researchers)
- Automatic plagiarism detection with PAIRwise 2.0. + (researchers)
- Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People + (researchers)
- Criminologist to have four papers retracted following months of scrutiny + (researchers)
- Czech Code of Ethics for Researchers + (researchers)
- Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (researchers)
- Debatte und Dialog + (researchers)
- Der Selbstauskunfts-Ansatz: Eine Reflexion über das Konzept des Guten in der Wissenschaft + (researchers)
- Estonian Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (researchers)
- Ethics Code of the Slovak Academy of Sciences: Addendum + (researchers)
- Ethics of ageing + (researchers)
- Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct + (researchers)
- French National Charter for Research Integrity + (researchers)
- From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark + (researchers)
- German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice + (researchers)
- Guidelines for Integrity in Scientific Research + (researchers)
- Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's + (researchers)
- INSPIRE Checklist + (researchers)
- Institutional review board approval and publication of human research results + (researchers)
- Interviewing young people on sensitive topics: An iterative approach + (researchers)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices + (researchers)
- Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet + (researchers)
- Irish National Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity + (researchers)
- Kairos – A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy + (researchers)
- Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America + (researchers)
- Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent + (researchers)
- Münazara ve Diyalog + (researchers)
- Münazara ve Diyalog + (researchers)
- Münazara ve Diyalog + (researchers)
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity + (researchers)
- Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics + (researchers)
- Payment in different contexts: How can payment reflect local considerations? + (researchers)
- Payments to young researchers in Malawi + (researchers)
- Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherers + (researchers)
- Postdoc randomly chose data during figure assembly + (researchers)
- Premature release of clinical trials data + (researchers)
- Protecting Research Subjects + (researchers)
- Research ethics training of trainers: Developing capacity of Bolivian health science and civil society leaders + (researchers)
- Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control + (researchers)
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel + (researchers)
- Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication + (researchers)
- Spanish National Statement on Scientific Integrity + (researchers)
- The Limits of Expertise + (researchers)
- The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research + (researchers)
- Uyarlanmış ikilem oyunu + (researchers)
- Werte/Tugenden und Normen + (researchers)
- Methods to increase data availability + (researchers)
- EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data) + (researchers)
- ORI - The Office of Research Integrity + (researchers)
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job + (researchers)
- French plant biologist cleared of misconduct in new inquiry + (Academic institutions)
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies + (Clinical researchers)
- Image Integrity + (Researchers)
- Integrating Ethics Into a Research Experience for Undergraduates + (students)
- Automatic plagiarism detection with PAIRwise 2.0. +
- Conflict of interest disclosure in early education of medical students + (students)
- Contentious problems in bioscience and biotechnology: a pilot study of an approach to ethics education + (students)
- Protecting Research Subjects + (phd students)
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism + (students)
- Institutional codes of conduct for research integrity + (Academic staff)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices + (Academic staff)
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future. + (Peer reviewers)
- Computational reproducibility: safeguarding the backbone of science + (Researchers)
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability + (Academic staff)
- FAIR-Aware: Your first step towards your FAIR data(set). + (Academic staff)
- Training overview + (Researchers)
- Research ethics training of trainers: Developing capacity of Bolivian health science and civil society leaders +
- Designing Online Resources in Preparation for Authentic Laboratory Experiences + (trainers)
- Applying Research Findings to Enhance Pre-Practicum Ethics Training + (trainers)
- A systematic approach to instruction in research ethics + (trainers)
- Ethics unwrapped collection + (All stakeholders in research)