Difference between revisions of "Category:Resource"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(MWBot) |
(MWBot) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!--------------------------------- MOBO GENERATED CATEGORY ----------------------------------><!-- | <!--------------------------------- MOBO GENERATED CATEGORY ----------------------------------><!-- | ||
| − | <!-- PREPEND -->{{#css: #mw-pages {display: none} }}{{Special:BrowseData/Resource|Resource_Type={{#urldecode:{{#urlget:type | + | <!-- PREPEND -->{{#css: #mw-pages {display: none} }}{{Special:BrowseData/Resource|Resource_Type={{#urldecode:{{#urlget:type}}}}}}<!-- /PREPEND --><!-- |
<!-- DEFAULT FORM --><span style="display:none;">{{ #default_form:Theme }}</span><!-- /DEFAULT FORM --><!-- | <!-- DEFAULT FORM --><span style="display:none;">{{ #default_form:Theme }}</span><!-- /DEFAULT FORM --><!-- | ||
Revision as of 14:24, 13 January 2020
- Choose a category:
- Guide (8)
- Initiative (28)
- Instruction (69)
- Interactive Content (5)
- Report (16)
- Resource (1054)
- Theme (215)
Back
Resources
Materials that help you in your every-day research practice to do Good Science.
There are no results for this report.
Pages in category "Resource"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 1,055 total.
(previous page) (next page)0
- Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.
- Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature
- Canadian Tri-agency framework: Responsible Conduct of Research
- Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism
- Journal peer review
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work
- Code of Ethics of the Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education
- The Ghost Collaborator
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job
- Data sharing and dual-use issues
- Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study
- Who Owns the Field Notes
- The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland's Guidelines on Good Research Practice
- Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough
- Data anonymity
- Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did
- New claim to authorship of published paper
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review
- Chinese 'Opinions' on Strengthening Research Integrity
- Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement
- Center for Open and REproducible Science (CORES)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct
- Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice
- Declaration of Helsinki
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Building and leading an effective team
- People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society
- Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd
- Authorship and Intellectual Property
- Inconsistent Findings Between Trainee and Researcher
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct
- Faulty Drug Trials Tarnish Japan's Clinical Research
- UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
- Whistle-blower Claims his Accusations Cost him his Job
- Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report
- Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education.
- Online Module: Research Misconduct
- Psychology Grad Student Faked Data
- The Wild West of Animal Experimentation
- Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics
- Criminologist to have four papers retracted following months of scrutiny
- The Croatian Committee for Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Rules of Procedure of the Ethics Committee.
- DOAB
- Fostering Integrity in Research
- Valley of Sorrow
- Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement
- European Charter of Patients' Rights
- Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: The role of education
- Finnish Guidelines on Doctoral Supervision and Review
- Vulnerable Populations
- What happens when an ex-physicist writes about gender identity?
- The Swiss Report on Homeopathy: A Case Study of Research Misconduct
- French National Charter for Research Integrity
- Possible Conflict of Interest
- Meta-assessment of bias in science
- INSPIRE
- University of Montana online research ethics course
1
- Academic medical centers and medical research: the challenges ahead
- The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’
- The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity
- Research Mentoring: An online module
- Manchester University's Data Protection Policy
- AI Sustainability in Practice Part Two: Sustainability Throughout the AI Workflow
- A Reflection on Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Austria
- Intellectual property
- Dublin City University's Position Statement on Open Access to Research Publications
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Position Paper on Research Integrity Officer Role & Reporting
- Witness to Murder
- Research Ethics – Official GRAD 5104 Blog - Blogs@VT
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2)
- What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct?
- Academic research record-keeping: best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutions
- UKRIO's Self-Assessment Tool for The Concordat to Support Research Integrity
- Make research misconduct involving agri inputs a criminal fraud: CCFI
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines
- Integrity in Scientific Research Video Series
- Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: GM potatoes
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud
- The Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Amendments to the Ethics Code of Ethics Committee in Science and Higher Education
- The future of scientific justice: the case of The Sceptical Environmentalist
- Jailed for Faking Data
- General Code of Ethics in Scientific Research (Romanian Ministry of Education, Research and Youth)
- Tutorial: PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies
- Fostering integrity in postgraduate research: an evidence-based policy and support framework
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC
- The Case of the Missing Artefact
- The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach
- The Reward Alliance
- Case Studies For Small Group Discussion
- European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Code of Conduct
- Withholding Study Purpose
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues
- Path2Integrity Campaign
- University of Tartu Ethics Centre's Codes of Ethics Handbook
- Transpose
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity
- University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Contemporary Science, Values and Animal Subjects in Research
- Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials
- Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
- Navigating disability identity and language in research involving children and young people.
- A New Challenge to Research Ethics: Patients-Led Research (PLR) and the Role of Internet Based Social Networks
- Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct
- Stakeholder involvement in ethical governance of R&I – a guide for HEFRCs
- Honest refereeing
- Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction
- The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Guide to Integrity and Responsibility in Research Practices
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Professional Manual
- Peer Review. The nuts and bolts
- Dual submissions
2
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine
- “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern
- Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance
- Polish Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies' Good Scientific Research Practice Recommendations
- Procedures of the Science Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
- The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)
- Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration
- The Norwegian Act on Ethics and Integrity in Research (The Research Ethics Act)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines
- European Geosciences Union (EGU) Code of Conduct
- Teaching students to study online communities ethically
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review
- Misconduct and Fraud in clinical research
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on defining and preventing unjustified interferences from funders, political and commercial actors
- University of Oslo's Policy on Fraudulent Documents
- Interviewing young people on sensitive topics: An iterative approach
- Reported Goals For Knowledge to be Learned in Responsible Conduct of Research Courses
- Research Data Management
- Responsible Research: Recommendations of the Institute of Science and Technology, Austria
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Copyright Violation
- Nutrition researcher selling supplements
- Potential figure manipulation with corresponding author uncontactable
- Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings
- Integrity Factor Glossary
- The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct
- A Guide to Internet Research Ethics (NESH, Norway)
- Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct
- UK Research Integrity Office Resources on Research Integrity
- Privacy
- Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India
- Data manipulation and institute’s internal review
- Rights to Authorship
- Pirated Idea for Research
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research
- Records From Controversial Twin Study Sealed at Yale Until 2065
- Wellcome Open Research
- Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds
- Beyond "compliance": the role of institutional culture in promoting research integrity.
- Site Unseen
- Advisory Report of the Committee on Exploration of the Revision of the Dutch Code of Conduct
- Infographics on research integrity
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics
- A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View
- Materials scientist up to nine retractions
- Ethical issues in research and publication
- Case report: incidental finding of a giant cardiac mass
- Local resources on improving science: basic study
- Science and Surveillance: Western Institutions Consider Role in China’s Uighur Crackdown
- Everything We Know About Facebook's Secret Mood Manipulation Experiment. It was probably legal. But was it ethical?
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports
- UKRIO's Procedure for the investigation of misconduct in research
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation
- Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects
3
- Who will mentor the mentors?
- Data Sharing, Informed Consent and Confidentiality
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game
- Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem
- ENERI Decision Tree
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication
- Reporting Findings in a Timely Manner
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism"
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices
- Disclosing Research Findings
- Manchester University's Code of Good Research Conduct
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making
- Data Privacy & Security Global Coronavirus Toolkit
- Doing Global science
- Australian Research Council Research Integrity Policy
- Procrastinating Reviewer
- Responsible authorship quick guide
- The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper?
- European Commission Guidance on H2020 Program Ethics Self-assessment
- Use Historical Empathy to Help Students Process the World Today
- The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
- Reproducibility of methodology
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism
- A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data
- Incorporating principles and practical wisdom in research ethics education: a preliminary study
- COPE core practices
- Pressure to disclose confidential research findings
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
- Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Failures Lessons Learned from Cautionary Tales
