Resource
From The Embassy of Good Science
{{Special:BrowseData/Resource|
Pages in category "Resource"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 1,055 total.
(previous page) (next page)0
- Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.
- Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature
- Canadian Tri-agency framework: Responsible Conduct of Research
- Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism
- Journal peer review
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work
- Code of Ethics of the Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education
- The Ghost Collaborator
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job
- Data sharing and dual-use issues
- Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study
- Who Owns the Field Notes
- The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland's Guidelines on Good Research Practice
- Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough
- Data anonymity
- Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did
- New claim to authorship of published paper
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review
- Chinese 'Opinions' on Strengthening Research Integrity
- Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement
- Center for Open and REproducible Science (CORES)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct
- Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice
- Declaration of Helsinki
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Building and leading an effective team
- People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society
- Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd
- Authorship and Intellectual Property
- Inconsistent Findings Between Trainee and Researcher
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct
- Faulty Drug Trials Tarnish Japan's Clinical Research
- UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
- Whistle-blower Claims his Accusations Cost him his Job
- Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report
- Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education.
- Online Module: Research Misconduct
- Psychology Grad Student Faked Data
- The Wild West of Animal Experimentation
- Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics
- Criminologist to have four papers retracted following months of scrutiny
- The Croatian Committee for Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Rules of Procedure of the Ethics Committee.
- DOAB
- Fostering Integrity in Research
- Valley of Sorrow
- Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement
- European Charter of Patients' Rights
- Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: The role of education
- Finnish Guidelines on Doctoral Supervision and Review
- Vulnerable Populations
- What happens when an ex-physicist writes about gender identity?
- The Swiss Report on Homeopathy: A Case Study of Research Misconduct
- French National Charter for Research Integrity
- Possible Conflict of Interest
- Meta-assessment of bias in science
- INSPIRE
- University of Montana online research ethics course
1
- Academic medical centers and medical research: the challenges ahead
- The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’
- The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity
- Research Mentoring: An online module
- Manchester University's Data Protection Policy
- AI Sustainability in Practice Part Two: Sustainability Throughout the AI Workflow
- A Reflection on Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Austria
- Intellectual property
- Dublin City University's Position Statement on Open Access to Research Publications
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Position Paper on Research Integrity Officer Role & Reporting
- Witness to Murder
- Research Ethics – Official GRAD 5104 Blog - Blogs@VT
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2)
- What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct?
- Academic research record-keeping: best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutions
- UKRIO's Self-Assessment Tool for The Concordat to Support Research Integrity
- Make research misconduct involving agri inputs a criminal fraud: CCFI
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines
- Integrity in Scientific Research Video Series
- Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: GM potatoes
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud
- The Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education's Amendments to the Ethics Code of Ethics Committee in Science and Higher Education
- The future of scientific justice: the case of The Sceptical Environmentalist
- Jailed for Faking Data
- General Code of Ethics in Scientific Research (Romanian Ministry of Education, Research and Youth)
- Tutorial: PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
- Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies
- Fostering integrity in postgraduate research: an evidence-based policy and support framework
- Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC
- The Case of the Missing Artefact
- The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach
- The Reward Alliance
- Case Studies For Small Group Discussion
- European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Code of Conduct
- Withholding Study Purpose
- You want to do what? Paper on anal swabs for COVID-19 retracted for ethical issues
- Path2Integrity Campaign
- University of Tartu Ethics Centre's Codes of Ethics Handbook
- Transpose
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity
- University Investigation Finds Misconduct by Bone Researcher with 23 Retractions
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Contemporary Science, Values and Animal Subjects in Research
- Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials
- Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
- Navigating disability identity and language in research involving children and young people.
- A New Challenge to Research Ethics: Patients-Led Research (PLR) and the Role of Internet Based Social Networks
- Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct
- Stakeholder involvement in ethical governance of R&I – a guide for HEFRCs
- Honest refereeing
- Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction
- The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Guide to Integrity and Responsibility in Research Practices
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Professional Manual
- Peer Review. The nuts and bolts
- Dual submissions
2
- The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine
- “There can be no justification for such studies”: Paper on artificial eyes for dogs earns expression of concern
- Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance
- Polish Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies' Good Scientific Research Practice Recommendations
- Procedures of the Science Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
- The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)
- Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration
- The Norwegian Act on Ethics and Integrity in Research (The Research Ethics Act)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines
- European Geosciences Union (EGU) Code of Conduct
- Teaching students to study online communities ethically
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review
- Misconduct and Fraud in clinical research
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on defining and preventing unjustified interferences from funders, political and commercial actors
- University of Oslo's Policy on Fraudulent Documents
- Interviewing young people on sensitive topics: An iterative approach
- Reported Goals For Knowledge to be Learned in Responsible Conduct of Research Courses
- Research Data Management
- Responsible Research: Recommendations of the Institute of Science and Technology, Austria
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Copyright Violation
- Nutrition researcher selling supplements
- Potential figure manipulation with corresponding author uncontactable
- Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings
- Integrity Factor Glossary
- The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct
- A Guide to Internet Research Ethics (NESH, Norway)
- Dublin City University's Policy for Responding to Allegations of Research Misconduct
- UK Research Integrity Office Resources on Research Integrity
- Privacy
- Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India
- Data manipulation and institute’s internal review
- Rights to Authorship
- Pirated Idea for Research
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research
- Records From Controversial Twin Study Sealed at Yale Until 2065
- Wellcome Open Research
- Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds
- Beyond "compliance": the role of institutional culture in promoting research integrity.
- Site Unseen
- Advisory Report of the Committee on Exploration of the Revision of the Dutch Code of Conduct
- Infographics on research integrity
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics
- A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View
- Materials scientist up to nine retractions
- Ethical issues in research and publication
- Case report: incidental finding of a giant cardiac mass
- Local resources on improving science: basic study
- Science and Surveillance: Western Institutions Consider Role in China’s Uighur Crackdown
- Everything We Know About Facebook's Secret Mood Manipulation Experiment. It was probably legal. But was it ethical?
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports
- UKRIO's Procedure for the investigation of misconduct in research
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation
- Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects
3
- Who will mentor the mentors?
- Data Sharing, Informed Consent and Confidentiality
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game
- Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem
- ENERI Decision Tree
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication
- Reporting Findings in a Timely Manner
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism"
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices
- Disclosing Research Findings
- Manchester University's Code of Good Research Conduct
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making
- Data Privacy & Security Global Coronavirus Toolkit
- Doing Global science
- Australian Research Council Research Integrity Policy
- Procrastinating Reviewer
- Responsible authorship quick guide
- The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper?
- European Commission Guidance on H2020 Program Ethics Self-assessment
- Use Historical Empathy to Help Students Process the World Today
- The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
- Reproducibility of methodology
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism
- A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data
- Incorporating principles and practical wisdom in research ethics education: a preliminary study
- COPE core practices
- Pressure to disclose confidential research findings
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
- Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Failures Lessons Learned from Cautionary Tales
