Most linked-to pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
250 agess ordered by recently added
- Important For:Researchers (654 links)
- Honesty (394 links)
- Respect (268 links)
- Accountability (245 links)
- Important For:All stakeholders in research (225 links)
- Reliability (195 links)
- LS - Life Sciences (149 links)
- Important For:Research institutions (135 links)
- SH - Social Sciences and Humanities (131 links)
- Transparency (131 links)
- Important For:Research Integrity Officers (128 links)
- Important For:Journal editors (123 links)
- Important For:Research Ethics Committees (107 links)
- Important For:PhD Students (107 links)
- United States (105 links)
- Important For:Academic institutions (105 links)
- Important For:Early career researchers (104 links)
- Important For:Academic staff (103 links)
- Important For:Research integrity trainers (102 links)
- Authorship (100 links)
- Important For:Supervisors (94 links)
- Plagiarism (91 links)
- US (90 links)
- Important For:Junior researchers (89 links)
- Important For:PhD students (84 links)
- Important For:Students (84 links)
- LS 07.08 - Health services, health care research (83 links)
- Europe (79 links)
- Important For:Ethics committee members (70 links)
- Important For:Policy makers (68 links)
- Important For:Senior researchers (68 links)
- Fabrication (67 links)
- Responsibility (63 links)
- PE - Physical Sciences and Engineering (61 links)
- USA (59 links)
- Falsification (59 links)
- Important For:Postdocs (58 links)
- Conflict of interest (56 links)
- Data management (56 links)
- Important For:researchers (53 links)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition (53 links)
- Important For:Editors (53 links)
- Important For:Administrators (52 links)
- Fairness (52 links)
- Important For:Research performing organisations (50 links)
- Research misconduct (50 links)
- Collaborative research (50 links)
- Consent (49 links)
- Important For:Funders (48 links)
- 2017 (47 links)
- Publication ethics (47 links)
- Research misconduct (47 links)
- Important For:Doctoral students (47 links)
- United Kingdom (46 links)
- Important For:Journal publishers (45 links)
- Important For:Graduate students (45 links)
- Clinical medicine (45 links)
- Confidentiality (45 links)
- Important For:Research funding organisations (44 links)
- Important For:Clinical researchers (43 links)
- Important For:Trainers in training (42 links)
- 2015 (42 links)
- Informed consent (40 links)
- Plagiarism (40 links)
- Conflict of interests (39 links)
- INSPIRE (39 links)
- Research with humans (38 links)
- 2014 (38 links)
- Important For:Trainers (37 links)
- 2018 (36 links)
- Important For:Peer reviewers (36 links)
- Informed consent (36 links)
- Important For:Scientists (36 links)
- The Netherlands (35 links)
- VIRT2UE (35 links)
- 2011 (34 links)
- Important For:Educators (34 links)
- Mentor/trainee relationship (34 links)
- 2016 (34 links)
- Important For:Authors (34 links)
- Important For:Bachelor students (33 links)
- Peer review (33 links)
- Authorship criteria (33 links)
- Important For:Universities (32 links)
- Integrity (32 links)
- Research ethics committees (32 links)
- Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity (32 links)
- RCR (32 links)
- Research with humans (31 links)
- Fabrication (31 links)
- Collaborative working (30 links)
- Standards of authorship (29 links)
- Research with Humans (29 links)
- Important For:Publishers (28 links)
- Authorship and publication (28 links)
- Important For:Graduate and postgraduate students (28 links)
- Falsification (28 links)
- Important For:Professors (28 links)
- Fictional (27 links)
- Important For:General public (27 links)
- SomeProperty:: (27 links)
- Important For:Principal investigators (27 links)
- American Sociological Association (27 links)
- Has Method:Participatory sessions (26 links)
- Important For:Research subjects (26 links)
- Open access (26 links)
- 2019 (26 links)
- Data Management (26 links)
- 2010 (26 links)
- Questionable research practice (25 links)
- 2012 (25 links)
- Important For:Qualitative researchers (25 links)
- Important For:Mentors (25 links)
- Has Method:Face to Face (25 links)
- Publication Ethics (24 links)
- Important For:research leaders (24 links)
- Important For:Teachers (24 links)
- 2009 (24 links)
- Good Practice (24 links)
- Conflict of Interest (24 links)
- Safety (23 links)
- 2020 (23 links)
- Important For:Collaborating researchers (23 links)
- Virtues in research integrity (23 links)
- Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors (22 links)
- Responsible supervision (22 links)
- Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct (22 links)
- 2013 (22 links)
- Important For:Clinical ethics consultants (22 links)
- European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI) (22 links)
- Germany (22 links)
- Privacy (21 links)
- Objectivity (21 links)
- Research Integrity Committees (21 links)
- 2008 (21 links)
- Peer review (21 links)
- Important For:Funding institutions (20 links)
- Important For:Industry (20 links)
- Research Misconduct (20 links)
- Important For:Master students (20 links)
- Important For:phd students (20 links)
- Data sharing (19 links)
- Important For:Peer-reviewers (19 links)
- Important For:Advisors of students (19 links)
- Balancing harms and benefits (19 links)
- Bias (19 links)
- FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results (19 links)
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature (19 links)
- Moral conflict and moral dilemma (19 links)
- ORI (18 links)
- Peer Review (18 links)
- Improper data use (a bias distorting research results) (18 links)
- VIRT2UE (18 links)
- Allegation of Misconduct (18 links)
- Whistleblowing (18 links)
- Research with Animals (18 links)
- Research misconduct (18 links)
- Important For:Journals (18 links)
- Care (18 links)
- Important For:Reviewers (18 links)
- Autonomy (18 links)
- Important For:Funding agencies (18 links)
- Whistleblower protection/rights (17 links)
- Funders’ responsibilities (17 links)
- Confidentiality (17 links)
- Protecting research subjects (17 links)
- Supervision (17 links)
- Research culture (16 links)
- Important For:Laboratory researchers (16 links)
- Privacy in research (16 links)
- Norway (16 links)
- Reproducibility training (16 links)
- Funders (16 links)
- Conflict of interest in peer review (16 links)
- 2006 (16 links)
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects (16 links)
- Important For:Civil society organisations (16 links)
- Research integrity training for PhD students (16 links)
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (16 links)
- Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas (16 links)
- Data management (16 links)
- Important For:Policy-makers (16 links)
- Important For:Research Administrators (16 links)
- Mentoring (16 links)
- UK (16 links)
- Ireland (15 links)
- 2005 (15 links)
- Publication/Authorship (15 links)
- Has Method:eLearning (15 links)
- Declaration of Helsinki (15 links)
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (15 links)
- Is there a reproducibility crisis in science? (15 links)
- Canada (15 links)
- Grant applications (15 links)
- SH 04.05 - Social and clinical psychology (15 links)
- Training, Supervision and Mentoring with Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (15 links)
- The SOPs4RI project (15 links)
- Supervision Guidelines (15 links)
- Has Method:Individual learning (14 links)
- 2004 (14 links)
- Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’) (14 links)
- Important For:Undergraduate students (14 links)
- ENERI manual-research integrity and ethics (14 links)
- Important For:Decision makers (14 links)
- SOPs4RI (14 links)
- Research ethics (14 links)
- Inappropriate authorship (14 links)
- Croatia (14 links)
- Dignity (14 links)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (14 links)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (14 links)
- Australian Research Council Research Integrity Policy (14 links)
- Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (14 links)
- Important For:medical researchers (14 links)
- Australia (14 links)
- Reproducibility (14 links)
- Human subject research (14 links)
- Ethical decision making (14 links)
- Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (14 links)
- United States Office of Research Integrity (14 links)
- Open Science (14 links)
- Impartiality (14 links)
- Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (14 links)
- Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (14 links)
- Non-reporting of negative findings (14 links)
- The impact of the GDPR on scientific data (13 links)
- Important For:research integrity researchers (13 links)
- Authorship and Contribution (13 links)
- Reproducability (13 links)
- Misrepresentation (13 links)
- European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC) (13 links)
- Allegations of misconduct (13 links)
- Research with animals (13 links)
- Important For:Anthropologists (13 links)
- Finland (13 links)
- Outcome reporting bias (13 links)
- Open access publishing: the new norm? (13 links)
- Cross-boundary collaborations (13 links)
- High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations (12 links)
- Data management checklist (12 links)
- Misconduct and Fraud in clinical research (12 links)
- Self-plagiarism (12 links)
- Journal peer review (12 links)
- REC approval (12 links)
- COPE core practices (12 links)
- Denmark (12 links)
- Balancing harms and benefits (12 links)
- Accuracy (12 links)
- Supervision (12 links)
- Ghost authorship (12 links)