LoginSign up

Pages with the most revisions

From The Embassy of Good Science

100 nss ordered by recently added

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Interim Practice Work‏‎ (13 revisions)
  2. Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control‏‎ (13 revisions)
  3. Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions‏‎ (13 revisions)
  4. Peer review card game‏‎ (13 revisions)
  5. Introduction: Guidelines and Discrepancies‏‎ (13 revisions)
  6. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity‏‎ (12 revisions)
  7. Confidentiality‏‎ (12 revisions)
  8. Research ethics committee members' skills‏‎ (12 revisions)
  9. Founders‏‎ (12 revisions)
  10. Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (12 revisions)
  11. The impact of the GDPR on scientific data‏‎ (12 revisions)
  12. The Dilemma Game‏‎ (12 revisions)
  13. Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (12 revisions)
  14. VIRT2UE train-the-trainer program‏‎ (12 revisions)
  15. Research Integrity Committees‏‎ (12 revisions)
  16. Values and norms‏‎ (12 revisions)
  17. Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's‏‎ (12 revisions)
  18. Peer review‏‎ (12 revisions)
  19. European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)‏‎ (11 revisions)
  20. Networks and projects promoting research integrity‏‎ (11 revisions)
  21. Organizing the training‏‎ (11 revisions)
  22. Initiatives promoting research integrity‏‎ (11 revisions)
  23. Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research‏‎ (11 revisions)
  24. Retractions: correcting the scientific literature‏‎ (11 revisions)
  25. European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)‏‎ (11 revisions)
  26. Science policy‏‎ (11 revisions)
  27. Selective citation‏‎ (11 revisions)
  28. Responsible Open Science‏‎ (11 revisions)
  29. Reflecting on Experiences and Practicing Exercises‏‎ (11 revisions)
  30. Conflicts of interest in citizen science‏‎ (11 revisions)
  31. Research misconduct‏‎ (11 revisions)
  32. Moral conflict and moral dilemma‏‎ (11 revisions)
  33. Collaborative working‏‎ (11 revisions)
  34. Journal Impact Factor‏‎ (11 revisions)
  35. The Netherlands‏‎ (11 revisions)
  36. Informed consent‏‎ (10 revisions)
  37. Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students‏‎ (10 revisions)
  38. Legal rights of accused scientists‏‎ (10 revisions)
  39. Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies‏‎ (10 revisions)
  40. Supervision‏‎ (10 revisions)
  41. The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field‏‎ (10 revisions)
  42. Privacy in research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  43. High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations‏‎ (10 revisions)
  44. Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity‏‎ (10 revisions)
  45. The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’‏‎ (10 revisions)
  46. Quality of research outputs and data sets‏‎ (10 revisions)
  47. The Netherlands‏‎ (10 revisions)
  48. Research with animals‏‎ (10 revisions)
  49. Polarized research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  50. Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials‏‎ (10 revisions)
  51. Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science‏‎ (10 revisions)
  52. Whistleblower protection/rights‏‎ (10 revisions)
  53. From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark‏‎ (10 revisions)
  54. Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism‏‎ (10 revisions)
  55. Mea Culpa: Scientific Misconduct - perspective of a research ethics board chair‏‎ (10 revisions)
  56. Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct‏‎ (10 revisions)
  57. Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel‏‎ (10 revisions)
  58. 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (10 revisions)
  59. Maintenance:ExportThemes‏‎ (10 revisions)
  60. The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics?‏‎ (10 revisions)
  61. Salami publication‏‎ (10 revisions)
  62. Predatory publishing‏‎ (10 revisions)
  63. The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  64. Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)‏‎ (10 revisions)
  65. Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals‏‎ (9 revisions)
  66. Non-reporting of negative findings‏‎ (9 revisions)
  67. Aboutcertifiedtrainers‏‎ (9 revisions)
  68. Open access publishing: the new norm?‏‎ (9 revisions)
  69. Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America‏‎ (9 revisions)
  70. Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man‏‎ (9 revisions)
  71. Declaration of Helsinki‏‎ (9 revisions)
  72. The Rotterdam Dilemma Game‏‎ (9 revisions)
  73. Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct‏‎ (9 revisions)
  74. INTEGRITY‏‎ (9 revisions)
  75. Cross-boundary collaborations‏‎ (9 revisions)
  76. Publishers - COPE guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  77. Informed assent‏‎ (9 revisions)
  78. SPOC: RCR through supervision and mentoring course‏‎ (9 revisions)
  79. Research Integrity Advisors‏‎ (9 revisions)
  80. Good Epidemiological Practice Guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  81. The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach‏‎ (9 revisions)
  82. 3 Ways to Blow the Whistle‏‎ (9 revisions)
  83. Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  84. Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent‏‎ (9 revisions)
  85. Self-plagiarism‏‎ (9 revisions)
  86. Supervision Guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  87. Baltimore Case - In Brief‏‎ (9 revisions)
  88. How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper‏‎ (9 revisions)
  89. Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  90. Research metrics‏‎ (9 revisions)
  91. The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud‏‎ (9 revisions)
  92. Criticism Swirls Around High-Profile History Book about North Korea‏‎ (9 revisions)
  93. Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas‏‎ (9 revisions)
  94. Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors‏‎ (9 revisions)
  95. The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science‏‎ (9 revisions)
  96. Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility‏‎ (9 revisions)
  97. Standards of authorship‏‎ (9 revisions)
  98. 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  99. H-index‏‎ (9 revisions)
  100. Risks to the environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems‏‎ (9 revisions)
View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://embassy.science:443/wiki/Special:MostRevisions"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information

Your platform for research integrity and ethics

Privacy statementTerms of serviceTake down policyContact
Let us keep you posted

Twitter Logo Dark.svg

The EnTIRE and VIRT2UE projects have received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research programme under grant agreements N 741782 and N 787580.

5.1.6